Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Low level Laser Therapy versus Ultrasonic therapy for the Treatment of Shoulder Impingement Syndrome A Systematic Review of randomized controlled trials
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Shoulder impingement syndrome is a common cause of shoulder pain in primary health care settings. Many physical modalities of treatment are available in clinical practice, however there is insufficient evidence on their relative effectiveness. This review compares the effectiveness of Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) with ultrasonic therapy.
Objectives
To assess the effectiveness of LLLT vs. ultrasonic therapy in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome
Search methods
We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (Pubmed), Embase, Scopus. We searched trials registries on ClinicalTrials.gov (www.ClinicalTrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal (apps.who.int/trialsearch/). We also hand-searched reference lists of all included primary studies, relevant conference proceedings and academic literature, and relevant systematic reviews (both Cochrane and non Cochrane), to identify additional studies missed from the original electronic searches (e.g., unpublished or in press citations). We did not use date or language restrictions.
Selection criteria
Randomized controlled trials comparing LLLT vs. US therapy in adult patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.
Data collection
Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We collected our primary outcomes information from the trials and assessed the quality of evidence for key outcomes using GRADE.
Results
We included 2 RCTs, contributing 67 participants to our qualitative synthesis. The overall risk of bias is high for both studies. Very low-quality evidence from 1 RCT shows slightly increased mean change in pain severity after LLLT compared to ultrasonic therapy in the short term (3 months) (MD 4.69, 95% CI -5.76 to -3.62).[13]. Very low-quality evidence from 1 RCT shows little to no difference in functional improvement after LLLT compared to ultrasonic therapy in the short term (after 3 months) (MD -0.63, 95% CI -5.53 to 4.27) [13]. No studies investigated Range of Motion in the short term. Verylow certainty evidence showed little to no difference in pain severity and function in the immediate post-treatment phase (up to 1 month). No studies addressed long term follow-up.
conclusion
There is insufficient evidence regarding the difference in effects between LLLT and Ultrasonic therapy for the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome.
Title: Low level Laser Therapy versus Ultrasonic therapy for the Treatment of Shoulder Impingement Syndrome A Systematic Review of randomized controlled trials
Description:
Abstract
Background
Shoulder impingement syndrome is a common cause of shoulder pain in primary health care settings.
Many physical modalities of treatment are available in clinical practice, however there is insufficient evidence on their relative effectiveness.
This review compares the effectiveness of Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) with ultrasonic therapy.
Objectives
To assess the effectiveness of LLLT vs.
ultrasonic therapy in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome
Search methods
We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (Pubmed), Embase, Scopus.
We searched trials registries on ClinicalTrials.
gov (www.
ClinicalTrials.
gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal (apps.
who.
int/trialsearch/).
We also hand-searched reference lists of all included primary studies, relevant conference proceedings and academic literature, and relevant systematic reviews (both Cochrane and non Cochrane), to identify additional studies missed from the original electronic searches (e.
g.
, unpublished or in press citations).
We did not use date or language restrictions.
Selection criteria
Randomized controlled trials comparing LLLT vs.
US therapy in adult patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.
Data collection
Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.
We contacted study authors for additional information.
We collected our primary outcomes information from the trials and assessed the quality of evidence for key outcomes using GRADE.
Results
We included 2 RCTs, contributing 67 participants to our qualitative synthesis.
The overall risk of bias is high for both studies.
Very low-quality evidence from 1 RCT shows slightly increased mean change in pain severity after LLLT compared to ultrasonic therapy in the short term (3 months) (MD 4.
69, 95% CI -5.
76 to -3.
62).
[13].
Very low-quality evidence from 1 RCT shows little to no difference in functional improvement after LLLT compared to ultrasonic therapy in the short term (after 3 months) (MD -0.
63, 95% CI -5.
53 to 4.
27) [13].
No studies investigated Range of Motion in the short term.
Verylow certainty evidence showed little to no difference in pain severity and function in the immediate post-treatment phase (up to 1 month).
No studies addressed long term follow-up.
conclusion
There is insufficient evidence regarding the difference in effects between LLLT and Ultrasonic therapy for the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome.
Related Results
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Cross-Sectional Study to Explore the Prevalence of Shoulder Impingement and Its Association with Training Volume Among Cricketers in Sport Academies of Faisalabad
Cross-Sectional Study to Explore the Prevalence of Shoulder Impingement and Its Association with Training Volume Among Cricketers in Sport Academies of Faisalabad
Purpose: Cricketers are vulnerable to high-risk injuries. Throwing and striking are the two activities that put the most strain and effort at the shoulder joint and leads to should...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
A Study of Association Between Acromion Types and Shoulder Pathology
A Study of Association Between Acromion Types and Shoulder Pathology
Abstract
Background and aim: Shoulder impingement and rotator cuff tear are commonly seen shoulder pathology. Pathological changes in soft tissue around shoulder can be due...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...

