Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Influence of Model Evolution and System Roles on ChatGPT’s Performance in Chinese Medical Licensing Exams: Comparative Study

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background With the increasing application of large language models like ChatGPT in various industries, its potential in the medical domain, especially in standardized examinations, has become a focal point of research. Objective The aim of this study is to assess the clinical performance of ChatGPT, focusing on its accuracy and reliability in the Chinese National Medical Licensing Examination (CNMLE). Methods The CNMLE 2022 question set, consisting of 500 single-answer multiple choices questions, were reclassified into 15 medical subspecialties. Each question was tested 8 to 12 times in Chinese on the OpenAI platform from April 24 to May 15, 2023. Three key factors were considered: the version of GPT-3.5 and 4.0, the prompt’s designation of system roles tailored to medical subspecialties, and repetition for coherence. A passing accuracy threshold was established as 60%. The χ2 tests and κ values were employed to evaluate the model’s accuracy and consistency. Results GPT-4.0 achieved a passing accuracy of 72.7%, which was significantly higher than that of GPT-3.5 (54%; P<.001). The variability rate of repeated responses from GPT-4.0 was lower than that of GPT-3.5 (9% vs 19.5%; P<.001). However, both models showed relatively good response coherence, with κ values of 0.778 and 0.610, respectively. System roles numerically increased accuracy for both GPT-4.0 (0.3%‐3.7%) and GPT-3.5 (1.3%‐4.5%), and reduced variability by 1.7% and 1.8%, respectively (P>.05). In subgroup analysis, ChatGPT achieved comparable accuracy among different question types (P>.05). GPT-4.0 surpassed the accuracy threshold in 14 of 15 subspecialties, while GPT-3.5 did so in 7 of 15 on the first response. Conclusions GPT-4.0 passed the CNMLE and outperformed GPT-3.5 in key areas such as accuracy, consistency, and medical subspecialty expertise. Adding a system role insignificantly enhanced the model’s reliability and answer coherence. GPT-4.0 showed promising potential in medical education and clinical practice, meriting further study.
Title: Influence of Model Evolution and System Roles on ChatGPT’s Performance in Chinese Medical Licensing Exams: Comparative Study
Description:
Abstract Background With the increasing application of large language models like ChatGPT in various industries, its potential in the medical domain, especially in standardized examinations, has become a focal point of research.
Objective The aim of this study is to assess the clinical performance of ChatGPT, focusing on its accuracy and reliability in the Chinese National Medical Licensing Examination (CNMLE).
Methods The CNMLE 2022 question set, consisting of 500 single-answer multiple choices questions, were reclassified into 15 medical subspecialties.
Each question was tested 8 to 12 times in Chinese on the OpenAI platform from April 24 to May 15, 2023.
Three key factors were considered: the version of GPT-3.
5 and 4.
0, the prompt’s designation of system roles tailored to medical subspecialties, and repetition for coherence.
A passing accuracy threshold was established as 60%.
The χ2 tests and κ values were employed to evaluate the model’s accuracy and consistency.
Results GPT-4.
0 achieved a passing accuracy of 72.
7%, which was significantly higher than that of GPT-3.
5 (54%; P<.
001).
The variability rate of repeated responses from GPT-4.
0 was lower than that of GPT-3.
5 (9% vs 19.
5%; P<.
001).
However, both models showed relatively good response coherence, with κ values of 0.
778 and 0.
610, respectively.
System roles numerically increased accuracy for both GPT-4.
0 (0.
3%‐3.
7%) and GPT-3.
5 (1.
3%‐4.
5%), and reduced variability by 1.
7% and 1.
8%, respectively (P>.
05).
In subgroup analysis, ChatGPT achieved comparable accuracy among different question types (P>.
05).
GPT-4.
0 surpassed the accuracy threshold in 14 of 15 subspecialties, while GPT-3.
5 did so in 7 of 15 on the first response.
Conclusions GPT-4.
0 passed the CNMLE and outperformed GPT-3.
5 in key areas such as accuracy, consistency, and medical subspecialty expertise.
Adding a system role insignificantly enhanced the model’s reliability and answer coherence.
GPT-4.
0 showed promising potential in medical education and clinical practice, meriting further study.

Related Results

Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Abstract Introduction The exact manner in which large language models (LLMs) will be integrated into pathology is not yet fully comprehended. This study examines the accuracy, bene...
Assessment of Chat-GPT, Gemini, and Perplexity in Principle of Research Publication: A Comparative Study
Assessment of Chat-GPT, Gemini, and Perplexity in Principle of Research Publication: A Comparative Study
Abstract Introduction Many researchers utilize artificial intelligence (AI) to aid their research endeavors. This study seeks to assess and contrast the performance of three sophis...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Unlocking Educational Potential: Exploring Students’ Satisfaction and Sustainable Engagement with ChatGPT Using the ECM Model
Unlocking Educational Potential: Exploring Students’ Satisfaction and Sustainable Engagement with ChatGPT Using the ECM Model
Aim/Purpose: The main goal of this study is to investigate the factors affecting students’ satisfaction and continuous usage of ChatGPT in an educational context, using the Expecta...
ChatGPT's Capabilities for Use in Anatomy Education and Anatomy Research
ChatGPT's Capabilities for Use in Anatomy Education and Anatomy Research
Dear Editors, Recently, the discussion of an artificial intelligence (AI) - fueled platform in several articles in your journal has attracted the attention of many researchers [1, ...
Health care managers’ perspectives on workforce licensing practice in Ethiopia: A qualitative study
Health care managers’ perspectives on workforce licensing practice in Ethiopia: A qualitative study
Abstract Background: Active monitoring of entry into the workforce starts with the licensing of professionals before entering the workforce. The professional licensing bodi...
ChatGPT takes the FCPS exam in Internal Medicine
ChatGPT takes the FCPS exam in Internal Medicine
ABSTRACT Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable proficiency in clinical knowledge, encompassing diagnostic medicine, and have been tested on questio...

Back to Top