Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Triangulation, incommensurability, and conditionalization
View through CrossRef
AbstractWe present a new justification for methodological triangulation (MT), the practice of using different methods to support the same scientific claim. Unlike existing accounts, our account captures cases in which the different methods in question are associated with, and rely on, incommensurable theories. Using a nonstandard Bayesian model, we show that even in such cases, a commitment to the minimal form of epistemic conservatism, captured by the rigidity condition that stands at the basis of Jeffrey’s conditionalization, supports the practice of MT.
Title: Triangulation, incommensurability, and conditionalization
Description:
AbstractWe present a new justification for methodological triangulation (MT), the practice of using different methods to support the same scientific claim.
Unlike existing accounts, our account captures cases in which the different methods in question are associated with, and rely on, incommensurable theories.
Using a nonstandard Bayesian model, we show that even in such cases, a commitment to the minimal form of epistemic conservatism, captured by the rigidity condition that stands at the basis of Jeffrey’s conditionalization, supports the practice of MT.
Related Results
Conjunction Conditionalization and Irrelevant Semifactuals
Conjunction Conditionalization and Irrelevant Semifactuals
Are counterfactuals with true antecedents and consequents trivially true? The principle of Conjunction Conditionalization ((A˄C)→(A>C)) is highly controversial. Many philosopher...
Differentiable surface triangulation
Differentiable surface triangulation
Triangle meshes remain the most popular data representation for surface geometry. This ubiquitous representation is essentially a hybrid one that decouples continuous
v...
The logic of partial supposition
The logic of partial supposition
AbstractAccording to orthodoxy, there are two basic moods of supposition: indicative and subjunctive. The most popular formalizations of the corresponding norms of suppositional ju...
Convergence and Consensus
Convergence and Consensus
Abstract
This chapter gives an account of the dynamics of SCS. §2.1. presents and criticizes the standard view of belief change via Bayesian conditionalization and a...
Methodological Triangulation Using Neural Networks for Business Research
Methodological Triangulation Using Neural Networks for Business Research
Artificial neural network (ANN) modeling methods are becoming more widely used as both a research and application paradigm across a much wider variety of business, medical, enginee...
Convergence, Incommensurability, Contradiction, or Overlapping Consensus? A Response to Daniel Weiss
Convergence, Incommensurability, Contradiction, or Overlapping Consensus? A Response to Daniel Weiss
Contemporary religious and scientific perspectives make various metaphysical truth claims that are frequently perceived to be either competitive or contradictory. Two dominant appr...
Kuhn, Thomas Samuel (1922–96)
Kuhn, Thomas Samuel (1922–96)
The early 1960s saw substantial turmoil in the philosophy of science, then dominated by logical empiricism. Most important was the confrontation of the prevailing philosophical tra...
Toward integrative triangulation in discourse-historical approach
Toward integrative triangulation in discourse-historical approach
This paper proposes a novel mode of Discourse-Historical Approach that features integrative triangulation of quantitative and qualitative analyses. The integrative triangulation is...

