Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

No difference in mortality between terlipressin and somatostatin treatments in cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding and renal functional impairment

View through CrossRef
Objective To study the differences in mortality between terlipressin and somatostatin treatments in cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) and renal functional impairment (RFI). Methods The National Health Insurance Database, part of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Program, was used to enroll cirrhotic patients who had received endoscopic variceal ligation plus somatostatin or terlipressin for EVB and who were hospitalized between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2010. The differences in mortality between the two vasoactive agents were compared and the risk factors for 30-day mortality because of EVB were identified. Results A total of 2324 cirrhotic patients with EVB were enrolled. The 30-day mortality data showed no significant differences between the somatostatin and the terlipressin groups (P=0.232). The risk of 30-day mortality was significantly higher in male patients [hazard ratio (HR): 1.50, P=0.002] and patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HR: 1.82, P<0.001), ascites (HR: 1.32, P=0.008), bacterial infections (HR: 2.10, P<0.001), hepatocellular carcinoma (HR: 2.09, P<0.001), and RFI (HR: 3.89, P<0.001). A subgroup analysis of cirrhotic patients with RFI was carried out. The overall 30-day mortality was higher in patients treated with somatostatin than in those treated with terlipressin (52.6 vs. 42.3%), but the difference failed to reach significance (adjust HR: 1.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.94–2.37, P=0.091). Conclusion RFI was the most important risk factor for 30-day mortality in EVB patients. Terlipressin and somatostatin had similar effects on 30-day mortality in cirrhotic patients with EVB and RFI.
Title: No difference in mortality between terlipressin and somatostatin treatments in cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding and renal functional impairment
Description:
Objective To study the differences in mortality between terlipressin and somatostatin treatments in cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) and renal functional impairment (RFI).
Methods The National Health Insurance Database, part of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Program, was used to enroll cirrhotic patients who had received endoscopic variceal ligation plus somatostatin or terlipressin for EVB and who were hospitalized between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2010.
The differences in mortality between the two vasoactive agents were compared and the risk factors for 30-day mortality because of EVB were identified.
Results A total of 2324 cirrhotic patients with EVB were enrolled.
The 30-day mortality data showed no significant differences between the somatostatin and the terlipressin groups (P=0.
232).
The risk of 30-day mortality was significantly higher in male patients [hazard ratio (HR): 1.
50, P=0.
002] and patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HR: 1.
82, P<0.
001), ascites (HR: 1.
32, P=0.
008), bacterial infections (HR: 2.
10, P<0.
001), hepatocellular carcinoma (HR: 2.
09, P<0.
001), and RFI (HR: 3.
89, P<0.
001).
A subgroup analysis of cirrhotic patients with RFI was carried out.
The overall 30-day mortality was higher in patients treated with somatostatin than in those treated with terlipressin (52.
6 vs.
42.
3%), but the difference failed to reach significance (adjust HR: 1.
49, 95% confidence interval: 0.
94–2.
37, P=0.
091).
Conclusion RFI was the most important risk factor for 30-day mortality in EVB patients.
Terlipressin and somatostatin had similar effects on 30-day mortality in cirrhotic patients with EVB and RFI.

Related Results

Rethinking Anticoagulation in Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplantation
Rethinking Anticoagulation in Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplantation
BackgroundA clinical dilemma exists in patients with CKD, ESKD, and after kidney transplantation, as they face concurrent risks of both thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications...
Real-time comparison of terlipressin vs. octreotide as an adjuvant treatment in the management of variceal bleeding
Real-time comparison of terlipressin vs. octreotide as an adjuvant treatment in the management of variceal bleeding
Abstract Variceal bleeding is a major complication and the leading cause of death in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. This study aims to compare the efficac...
Terlipressin in Hepatorenal Syndrome
Terlipressin in Hepatorenal Syndrome
Objective: To compare the pharmacology, dosing, and adverse reactions of vasopressin and terlipressin for the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and assess...
Vasopressin and Terlipressin in the Treatment of Vasodilatory Septic Shock: A Systematic Review
Vasopressin and Terlipressin in the Treatment of Vasodilatory Septic Shock: A Systematic Review
Background: Vasodilatory septic shock unresponsive to fluid resuscitation requires the addition of vasopressors. Catecholamines remain the first line vasopresso...
PREDICTORS OF RE-BLEEDING AFTER OESOPHAGEAL VARICEAL BANDING IN CIRRHOTIC PATIENTS AT 4 WEEKS
PREDICTORS OF RE-BLEEDING AFTER OESOPHAGEAL VARICEAL BANDING IN CIRRHOTIC PATIENTS AT 4 WEEKS
Background: Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a serious complication in cirrhotic patients. Without recommended management, recurrent bleeding happens in 30-40% within the n...

Back to Top