Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Diagnostic reasoning
View through CrossRef
Diagnostic reasoning is the mental process by which physicians turn information about the patient into the name of a disease. To do this, physicians must gather and evaluate evidence relevant to the clinical problem, and then choose a diagnosis or make a decision about management. As in detective work, with which diagnostic reasoning has many similarities, physicians have to reason from observed effects to their possible causes. This chapter explores the thinking behind diagnostic reasoning, drawing on insights from cognitive psychology, philosophy, and the design of computer programs. If physicians have a deeper understanding of the reasoning that underpins making a diagnosis, they may be more astute diagnosticians, and better able to teach the skill to novices. And, however physicians arrive at a diagnosis, they need to be able to articulate their reasoning to the patient and their colleagues.
Title: Diagnostic reasoning
Description:
Diagnostic reasoning is the mental process by which physicians turn information about the patient into the name of a disease.
To do this, physicians must gather and evaluate evidence relevant to the clinical problem, and then choose a diagnosis or make a decision about management.
As in detective work, with which diagnostic reasoning has many similarities, physicians have to reason from observed effects to their possible causes.
This chapter explores the thinking behind diagnostic reasoning, drawing on insights from cognitive psychology, philosophy, and the design of computer programs.
If physicians have a deeper understanding of the reasoning that underpins making a diagnosis, they may be more astute diagnosticians, and better able to teach the skill to novices.
And, however physicians arrive at a diagnosis, they need to be able to articulate their reasoning to the patient and their colleagues.
Related Results
Working It Out together
Working It Out together
Resisting some of the leading conceptions of joint moral reasoning prominent in the philosophical tradition, such as Kant’s kingdom of ends and Habermas’s discourse ethics, because...
Practical Reasoning
Practical Reasoning
This chapter discusses two contemporary pictures of practical reasoning. According to the Rule-Guidance Conception, roughly, practical reasoning is a rule-guided operation of acqui...
Law and the Unity of Practical Reasoning
Law and the Unity of Practical Reasoning
This open access book introduces the first systematic approach to the debate on the unity or fragmentation of practical reasoning and its profound implications for legal philosophy...
Syllogistic Logic and Mathematical Proof
Syllogistic Logic and Mathematical Proof
Abstract
Syllogistic Logic and Mathematical Proof chronicles and analyzes a debate centered on the following question: does syllogistic logic have the resources to c...
Taking Stock
Taking Stock
This chapter considers some general issues about the nature of the account that is emerging. It asks whether moral reasoning should have been treated as it was in Chapter 5. It als...
Controversial Reasoning in Indian Philosophy
Controversial Reasoning in Indian Philosophy
A pervasive form of reasoning exists in Indian philosophy. Known as arthâpatti, this epistemic instrument is crucial to Mimamsa philosophers, as well as a point of controversy for ...
Modelo teórico para mensuração do pensamento crítico holístico no ensino do processo diagnóstico de enfermagem
Modelo teórico para mensuração do pensamento crítico holístico no ensino do processo diagnóstico de enfermagem
The theoretical model book for measuring holistic critical thinking (PCH) in the teaching of the nursing diagnostic process (PDE) highlights the complexity of the PDE based on the ...

