Javascript must be enabled to continue!
103. Evaluating The Appropriateness of Vaccine Administration in Patients with Splenectomy
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
The spleen removes microorganisms from the bloodstream and produces antibodies for enhanced immune response. Patients with asplenia are at increased risk for infections caused by encapsulated organisms and have a 6-fold increased risk of sepsis compared to the general population. Those that acquire an infection have a mortality rate of 80%. The CDC recommends administering the meningococcal, influenza, pneumococcal, and Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) vaccine at least 2 weeks before or after splenectomy.
Methods
This retrospective chart review evaluated the appropriateness of vaccine administration for patients undergoing splenectomy at Long Island Jewish Medical Center (LIJMC) from January 2016 to June 2020. Patients were included if they were admitted to LIJMC, 18 years or older, and had splenectomy at LIJMC within previous 7 years. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, admitted to an outside hospital for splenectomy, or had an unknown time of splenectomy. The primary objective was appropriateness of vaccine administration. Inappropriateness was defined as having at least 1 error with administration, including vaccine omissions, timing of vaccine, sequencing (Pneumovax®23 given before Prevnar13®), vaccine interaction (Menactra® given with Prevnar13®), or duplicated vaccines.
Results
Of the 174 patients screened, 29 patients were included in analysis, with a mean age of 58.2 ± 20.6 years. The splenectomy was elective in 69% of patients and emergent in 31% of patients. The vaccine regimen was given inappropriately in 96.6% of patients. The reasons for inappropriateness were vaccine selection (100%), timing (39.3%), vaccine sequence (39.3%), vaccine interaction (14.3%), and duplicate vaccines (7.1%). Excluding emergent splenectomies, 100% of patients received an inappropriate vaccine regimen. The vaccines were given at least 2 weeks before elective splenectomies in 40% of patients, peri-operatively in 30% of patients, and not given in 25% of patients.
Conclusion
Patients undergoing splenectomy received inappropriate vaccine regimens mainly due to omissions, timing, and sequencing. Prevnar13® should be given before Pneumovax®23 when both are indicated and vaccines should be administered at least 2 weeks before splenectomy.
An orderset was created to mitigate errors with vaccine selection for patients undergoing splenectomy.
Disclosures
All Authors: No reported disclosures.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: 103. Evaluating The Appropriateness of Vaccine Administration in Patients with Splenectomy
Description:
Abstract
Background
The spleen removes microorganisms from the bloodstream and produces antibodies for enhanced immune response.
Patients with asplenia are at increased risk for infections caused by encapsulated organisms and have a 6-fold increased risk of sepsis compared to the general population.
Those that acquire an infection have a mortality rate of 80%.
The CDC recommends administering the meningococcal, influenza, pneumococcal, and Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) vaccine at least 2 weeks before or after splenectomy.
Methods
This retrospective chart review evaluated the appropriateness of vaccine administration for patients undergoing splenectomy at Long Island Jewish Medical Center (LIJMC) from January 2016 to June 2020.
Patients were included if they were admitted to LIJMC, 18 years or older, and had splenectomy at LIJMC within previous 7 years.
Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, admitted to an outside hospital for splenectomy, or had an unknown time of splenectomy.
The primary objective was appropriateness of vaccine administration.
Inappropriateness was defined as having at least 1 error with administration, including vaccine omissions, timing of vaccine, sequencing (Pneumovax®23 given before Prevnar13®), vaccine interaction (Menactra® given with Prevnar13®), or duplicated vaccines.
Results
Of the 174 patients screened, 29 patients were included in analysis, with a mean age of 58.
2 ± 20.
6 years.
The splenectomy was elective in 69% of patients and emergent in 31% of patients.
The vaccine regimen was given inappropriately in 96.
6% of patients.
The reasons for inappropriateness were vaccine selection (100%), timing (39.
3%), vaccine sequence (39.
3%), vaccine interaction (14.
3%), and duplicate vaccines (7.
1%).
Excluding emergent splenectomies, 100% of patients received an inappropriate vaccine regimen.
The vaccines were given at least 2 weeks before elective splenectomies in 40% of patients, peri-operatively in 30% of patients, and not given in 25% of patients.
Conclusion
Patients undergoing splenectomy received inappropriate vaccine regimens mainly due to omissions, timing, and sequencing.
Prevnar13® should be given before Pneumovax®23 when both are indicated and vaccines should be administered at least 2 weeks before splenectomy.
An orderset was created to mitigate errors with vaccine selection for patients undergoing splenectomy.
Disclosures
All Authors: No reported disclosures.
Related Results
Splenectomy Does Not Improve Survival in Chronic Active Epstein-Barr Virus Disease Patients
Splenectomy Does Not Improve Survival in Chronic Active Epstein-Barr Virus Disease Patients
Abstract
Purpose
We aimed to evaluate the clinical value of splenectomy as a treatment for Chronic active Epstein-Barr virus disease (CAEBVD).
Methods
We retrospectively r...
Understanding Treatment Preferences In Patients with Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia Contemplating Splenectomy: A Qualitative Study
Understanding Treatment Preferences In Patients with Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia Contemplating Splenectomy: A Qualitative Study
Abstract
Abstract 392
Introduction
Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a common autoimmune bleeding disorder...
Splenectomy in Lymphoproliferative Disorders: A Single Eastern European Center Experience
Splenectomy in Lymphoproliferative Disorders: A Single Eastern European Center Experience
Background and Objectives: Hematological malignancies are usually systemic diseases of life-threatening impact, and frequently require prompt and energetic therapeutic intervention...
Splenectomy for hypersplenism in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
Splenectomy for hypersplenism in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
Abstract
Between 1 January 1980 and 31 July 1988, 62 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) or malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were splenectomized ...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Measles Vaccination Coverage and Protective Effectiveness in the Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia, 2019-2024
Measles Vaccination Coverage and Protective Effectiveness in the Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia, 2019-2024
Abstract
Background:
Despite the availability of an effective vaccine, measles remains a major public health problem in Ethiopi...
Understanding why patients with immune thrombocytopenia are deeply divided on splenectomy
Understanding why patients with immune thrombocytopenia are deeply divided on splenectomy
AbstractBackgroundSplenectomy is an effective treatment for chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP); however, patients' willingness to accept splenectomy is variable.ObjectiveTo expl...
Diagnosis and treatment of portal vein thrombosis following splenectomy
Diagnosis and treatment of portal vein thrombosis following splenectomy
Abstract
Background
Portal vein thrombosis is a rare but potentially fatal complication of splenectomy. The aim of this study wa...

