Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Zhuangzi

View through CrossRef
The ancient text of theZhuangziis analyzed as containing three importantly different positions pertaining to the philosophy of religion, here named those of “the Radical Zhuangzi,” “the Conventional Zhuangzi,” and “the Cultural Zhuangzi.” Their ideas are presented in terms of three themes: (i) Heaven and Dao, (ii) Spiritual Exercises and Mystical Experience, and (iii) Mortality. The Radical Zhuangzi applies a characteristic three‐step logic deployed in all these areas: first, all identities are shown to depend on the making of distinctions; second, these distinctions are shown to be self‐undermining, suggesting a oneness of sorts beyond all distinction; and third, this oneness too is denied on the same grounds. The Radical Zhuangzi applies skeptical arguments to undermine the possibility of definite identifiability, and this is applied also to traditional notions of Heaven and Dao. But this eschewal of all metaphysical commitments, either for the existence or nonexistence of a divine agent or guiding principle of the world or a true self, is employed as an apophatic praxis that leads to ecstatic states of enhanced sensitivity to the transformation between identities. This free transformation between identities is also deployed to undermine commonsense fears of death. The Conventional Zhuangzi focuses instead on the elimination of distinctions and the elevation of an originary oneness, identified with Heaven, Dao, orqi(vital energy), and present in individual beings as their innate endowment, virtuosity, or nature. The apophatic techniques can also be applied within this model, leading also to attunement with universal transformation, enhanced technical skills, return to simple lifestyles, and reconciliation with death. The Cultural Zhuangzi is simply a name for the combination and reconciliation of these two different positions, the Zhuangzi who was believed for two millennia to be the author of all the parts of the 33‐chapterZhuangzi.
Title: Zhuangzi
Description:
The ancient text of theZhuangziis analyzed as containing three importantly different positions pertaining to the philosophy of religion, here named those of “the Radical Zhuangzi,” “the Conventional Zhuangzi,” and “the Cultural Zhuangzi.
” Their ideas are presented in terms of three themes: (i) Heaven and Dao, (ii) Spiritual Exercises and Mystical Experience, and (iii) Mortality.
The Radical Zhuangzi applies a characteristic three‐step logic deployed in all these areas: first, all identities are shown to depend on the making of distinctions; second, these distinctions are shown to be self‐undermining, suggesting a oneness of sorts beyond all distinction; and third, this oneness too is denied on the same grounds.
The Radical Zhuangzi applies skeptical arguments to undermine the possibility of definite identifiability, and this is applied also to traditional notions of Heaven and Dao.
But this eschewal of all metaphysical commitments, either for the existence or nonexistence of a divine agent or guiding principle of the world or a true self, is employed as an apophatic praxis that leads to ecstatic states of enhanced sensitivity to the transformation between identities.
This free transformation between identities is also deployed to undermine commonsense fears of death.
The Conventional Zhuangzi focuses instead on the elimination of distinctions and the elevation of an originary oneness, identified with Heaven, Dao, orqi(vital energy), and present in individual beings as their innate endowment, virtuosity, or nature.
The apophatic techniques can also be applied within this model, leading also to attunement with universal transformation, enhanced technical skills, return to simple lifestyles, and reconciliation with death.
The Cultural Zhuangzi is simply a name for the combination and reconciliation of these two different positions, the Zhuangzi who was believed for two millennia to be the author of all the parts of the 33‐chapterZhuangzi.

Related Results

Harmonizing Diversity: Insights from Zhuangzi’s Concept of Zhi 知
Harmonizing Diversity: Insights from Zhuangzi’s Concept of Zhi 知
Zhuangzi articulates a framework for harmonizing diversity in both thought and practice. An in-depth analysis of the concept of zhi 知 is essential for understanding Zhuangzi’s pers...
A Study on the Perspective of Public Office and Employment of Zhuangzi
A Study on the Perspective of Public Office and Employment of Zhuangzi
Scholars in ancient East Asian society tried to practice humanities by going on the path of public office after polishing their studies. In particular, Confucianism viewed study an...
A Comparative Study of Zhuangzi and Nietzsche’s Tragic Vision and Aestheticism
A Comparative Study of Zhuangzi and Nietzsche’s Tragic Vision and Aestheticism
Abstract This article argues that both Zhuangzi and Nietzsche’s aestheticism is a means of overcoming their tragic vision of life. Nietzsche’s aesthetic state of Dio...
Empathy in the Zhuangzi
Empathy in the Zhuangzi
AbstractThis article investigates elements of empathy in the Zhuangzi 莊子. It outlines four prominent aspects of current scholarship on empathy: different types of empathy, the othe...
Freedom and Self-Government: Ham Seok-heon’s Readings of Zhuangzi
Freedom and Self-Government: Ham Seok-heon’s Readings of Zhuangzi
What does it mean to read Ham Seok-heon in the 21st century? Furthermore, what does it mean to read the ‘East-Asian Classics’ through him? In this article, I would like to raise a ...
Transcending Individual Traditions: Zhang Taiyan’s Interpretation of Zhuangzi’s Notion of Chengxin
Transcending Individual Traditions: Zhang Taiyan’s Interpretation of Zhuangzi’s Notion of Chengxin
This article examines the nuanced interpretations of chengxin 成心 in the Zhuangzi 莊子, a foundational Daoist text, across different philosophical traditions. Historically, Daoist thi...
Zhuangzi
Zhuangzi
The Zhuangzi is a Daoist text usually associated with ‘Master Zhuang’ (fourth century bc), also known as Zhuang Zhou. Scholarly consensus regards the thirty-three chapters of this ...

Back to Top