Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Using a pharmacogenetic clinical decision support system to improve psychopharmacotherapy dosing in patients with affective disorders
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Objectives
Although pharmacogenetic tests provide the information on a genotype and the predicted phenotype, these tests do not themselves provide the interpretation of data for a physician. Currently, there are approximately two dozen pharmacogenomic clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) used in psychiatry. Implementation of the CDSSs forming the recommendations on drug and dose selection according to the results of pharmacogenetic testing is an urgent task. Fulfillment of this task will allow increasing the efficacy of therapy and decreasing the risk of undesirable side effects.
Methods
The study included 118 male patients (48 in the main group and 70 in the control group) with affective disorders and comorbid alcohol use disorder. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of therapy, several international psychometric scales and rating scales to measure side effects were used. Genotyping was performed using the real-time polymerase chain reaction with allele-specific hybridization. Pharmacogenetic testing results were interpreted using free software PGX2 (LLE Medicine, Russian Federation, Biomedical Cluster of Skolkovo, Moscow Innovative Cluster; www.pgx2.com).
Results
The statistically significant differences across the scores on psychometric scales were revealed. For instance, the total score on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression by day 9 was 9.0 [8.0; 10.0] for the main group and 11.0 [10.0; 12.0] (p<0.001) for the control group and by day 16 it was 4.0 [2.0; 6.0] for the main group and 14.0 [13.0; 14.0] (p<0.001) for the control group. The UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale (UKU) also revealed a statistically significant difference. The total score on the UKU scale by day 9 was 4.0 [4.0; 5.0] for the main group and 5.0 [5.0; 6.0] (p<0.001) for the control group and by day 16 this difference grew significantly: 3.0 [0.0; 4.2] for the main group and 9.0 [7.0; 11.0] (p<0.001) for the control group.
Conclusions
Pharmacogenetic-guided personalization of the drug dose in patients with affective disorders and comorbid alcohol use disorder can reduce the risk of undesirable side effects and pharmacoresistance. It allows recommending the use of pharmacogenetic CDSSs for optimizing drug dosage.
Title: Using a pharmacogenetic clinical decision support system to improve psychopharmacotherapy dosing in patients with affective disorders
Description:
Abstract
Objectives
Although pharmacogenetic tests provide the information on a genotype and the predicted phenotype, these tests do not themselves provide the interpretation of data for a physician.
Currently, there are approximately two dozen pharmacogenomic clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) used in psychiatry.
Implementation of the CDSSs forming the recommendations on drug and dose selection according to the results of pharmacogenetic testing is an urgent task.
Fulfillment of this task will allow increasing the efficacy of therapy and decreasing the risk of undesirable side effects.
Methods
The study included 118 male patients (48 in the main group and 70 in the control group) with affective disorders and comorbid alcohol use disorder.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of therapy, several international psychometric scales and rating scales to measure side effects were used.
Genotyping was performed using the real-time polymerase chain reaction with allele-specific hybridization.
Pharmacogenetic testing results were interpreted using free software PGX2 (LLE Medicine, Russian Federation, Biomedical Cluster of Skolkovo, Moscow Innovative Cluster; www.
pgx2.
com).
Results
The statistically significant differences across the scores on psychometric scales were revealed.
For instance, the total score on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression by day 9 was 9.
0 [8.
0; 10.
0] for the main group and 11.
0 [10.
0; 12.
0] (p<0.
001) for the control group and by day 16 it was 4.
0 [2.
0; 6.
0] for the main group and 14.
0 [13.
0; 14.
0] (p<0.
001) for the control group.
The UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale (UKU) also revealed a statistically significant difference.
The total score on the UKU scale by day 9 was 4.
0 [4.
0; 5.
0] for the main group and 5.
0 [5.
0; 6.
0] (p<0.
001) for the control group and by day 16 this difference grew significantly: 3.
0 [0.
0; 4.
2] for the main group and 9.
0 [7.
0; 11.
0] (p<0.
001) for the control group.
Conclusions
Pharmacogenetic-guided personalization of the drug dose in patients with affective disorders and comorbid alcohol use disorder can reduce the risk of undesirable side effects and pharmacoresistance.
It allows recommending the use of pharmacogenetic CDSSs for optimizing drug dosage.
Related Results
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Exploring the Efficacy of Once and Twice Weekly Thyroxine Dosing: A Promising Approach for Hypothyroidism Management
Exploring the Efficacy of Once and Twice Weekly Thyroxine Dosing: A Promising Approach for Hypothyroidism Management
Abstract
Introduction
Hypothyroidism is a common endocrine disorder, in which the management involves daily intake of thyroxine. However, adherence to a daily medication regimen po...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Use of Extended Dosing Intervals of Dupilumab in Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Use of Extended Dosing Intervals of Dupilumab in Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract:
Dupilumab is a biological agent used in atopic dermatitis (AD) with 2-weekly dosing. Extending dosing inte...
Pharmacogenetics Clinical Decision Support Systems for Primary Care in England: Co-Design Study (Preprint)
Pharmacogenetics Clinical Decision Support Systems for Primary Care in England: Co-Design Study (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Pharmacogenetics can impact patient care and outcomes through personalizing the selection of medicines, resulting in improved efficacy and a redu...
Exploring the Pharmacogenetic Landscape: Identification of Clinically Relevant Genotypes by a Nation-Wide Medical Testing Laboratory in Romania
Exploring the Pharmacogenetic Landscape: Identification of Clinically Relevant Genotypes by a Nation-Wide Medical Testing Laboratory in Romania
Background: Pharmacogenetic testing aims to assess the existence of a genetic predisposition that could influence the efficacy or safety of pharmacotherapy. The objective of the pr...
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently identified immune-mediated condition that is debilitating and often overlooked. While IgG4-RD has be...

