Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Using a pharmacogenetic clinical decision support system to improve psychopharmacotherapy dosing in patients with affective disorders
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Objectives
Although pharmacogenetic tests provide the information on a genotype and the predicted phenotype, these tests do not themselves provide the interpretation of data for a physician. Currently, there are approximately two dozen pharmacogenomic clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) used in psychiatry. Implementation of the CDSSs forming the recommendations on drug and dose selection according to the results of pharmacogenetic testing is an urgent task. Fulfillment of this task will allow increasing the efficacy of therapy and decreasing the risk of undesirable side effects.
Methods
The study included 118 male patients (48 in the main group and 70 in the control group) with affective disorders and comorbid alcohol use disorder. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of therapy, several international psychometric scales and rating scales to measure side effects were used. Genotyping was performed using the real-time polymerase chain reaction with allele-specific hybridization. Pharmacogenetic testing results were interpreted using free software PGX2 (LLE Medicine, Russian Federation, Biomedical Cluster of Skolkovo, Moscow Innovative Cluster; www.pgx2.com).
Results
The statistically significant differences across the scores on psychometric scales were revealed. For instance, the total score on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression by day 9 was 9.0 [8.0; 10.0] for the main group and 11.0 [10.0; 12.0] (p<0.001) for the control group and by day 16 it was 4.0 [2.0; 6.0] for the main group and 14.0 [13.0; 14.0] (p<0.001) for the control group. The UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale (UKU) also revealed a statistically significant difference. The total score on the UKU scale by day 9 was 4.0 [4.0; 5.0] for the main group and 5.0 [5.0; 6.0] (p<0.001) for the control group and by day 16 this difference grew significantly: 3.0 [0.0; 4.2] for the main group and 9.0 [7.0; 11.0] (p<0.001) for the control group.
Conclusions
Pharmacogenetic-guided personalization of the drug dose in patients with affective disorders and comorbid alcohol use disorder can reduce the risk of undesirable side effects and pharmacoresistance. It allows recommending the use of pharmacogenetic CDSSs for optimizing drug dosage.
Title: Using a pharmacogenetic clinical decision support system to improve psychopharmacotherapy dosing in patients with affective disorders
Description:
Abstract
Objectives
Although pharmacogenetic tests provide the information on a genotype and the predicted phenotype, these tests do not themselves provide the interpretation of data for a physician.
Currently, there are approximately two dozen pharmacogenomic clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) used in psychiatry.
Implementation of the CDSSs forming the recommendations on drug and dose selection according to the results of pharmacogenetic testing is an urgent task.
Fulfillment of this task will allow increasing the efficacy of therapy and decreasing the risk of undesirable side effects.
Methods
The study included 118 male patients (48 in the main group and 70 in the control group) with affective disorders and comorbid alcohol use disorder.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of therapy, several international psychometric scales and rating scales to measure side effects were used.
Genotyping was performed using the real-time polymerase chain reaction with allele-specific hybridization.
Pharmacogenetic testing results were interpreted using free software PGX2 (LLE Medicine, Russian Federation, Biomedical Cluster of Skolkovo, Moscow Innovative Cluster; www.
pgx2.
com).
Results
The statistically significant differences across the scores on psychometric scales were revealed.
For instance, the total score on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression by day 9 was 9.
0 [8.
0; 10.
0] for the main group and 11.
0 [10.
0; 12.
0] (p<0.
001) for the control group and by day 16 it was 4.
0 [2.
0; 6.
0] for the main group and 14.
0 [13.
0; 14.
0] (p<0.
001) for the control group.
The UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale (UKU) also revealed a statistically significant difference.
The total score on the UKU scale by day 9 was 4.
0 [4.
0; 5.
0] for the main group and 5.
0 [5.
0; 6.
0] (p<0.
001) for the control group and by day 16 this difference grew significantly: 3.
0 [0.
0; 4.
2] for the main group and 9.
0 [7.
0; 11.
0] (p<0.
001) for the control group.
Conclusions
Pharmacogenetic-guided personalization of the drug dose in patients with affective disorders and comorbid alcohol use disorder can reduce the risk of undesirable side effects and pharmacoresistance.
It allows recommending the use of pharmacogenetic CDSSs for optimizing drug dosage.
Related Results
619. Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) Target Attainment Analyses to Support Epetraborole Dose Selection for the Treatment of Patients with Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC) Lung Disease
619. Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) Target Attainment Analyses to Support Epetraborole Dose Selection for the Treatment of Patients with Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC) Lung Disease
Abstract
Background
Epetraborole (EBO) is an orally available, bacterial leucyl transfer RNA synthetase inhibitor that concentra...
LB2306. Population Pharmacokinetic (PPK), Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic attainment (PTA), and Clinical Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analyses for Sulbactam-Durlobactam (SUL-DUR) to Support Dose Selection for the Treatment of Acinetobacter baum
LB2306. Population Pharmacokinetic (PPK), Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic attainment (PTA), and Clinical Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analyses for Sulbactam-Durlobactam (SUL-DUR) to Support Dose Selection for the Treatment of Acinetobacter baum
Abstract
Background
SUL-DUR is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination in development for the treatment of ABC infections, ...
593. Population Pharmacokinetic Model Development for Epetraborole and Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC) Lung Disease Patients Using Data from Phase 1 and 2 Studies
593. Population Pharmacokinetic Model Development for Epetraborole and Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC) Lung Disease Patients Using Data from Phase 1 and 2 Studies
Abstract
Background
Epetraborole (EBO), an orally available bacterial leucyl transfer RNA synthetase inhibitor with potent activ...
592. Impact of Elevated MIC Values on Echinocandin Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) Candida glabrata Target Attainment (TA)
592. Impact of Elevated MIC Values on Echinocandin Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) Candida glabrata Target Attainment (TA)
Abstract
Background
Given the increasing prevalence of non-albicans Candida species, including C. glabrata and C. auris, which h...
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Exploring the Efficacy of Once and Twice Weekly Thyroxine Dosing: A Promising Approach for Hypothyroidism Management
Exploring the Efficacy of Once and Twice Weekly Thyroxine Dosing: A Promising Approach for Hypothyroidism Management
Abstract
Introduction
Hypothyroidism is a common endocrine disorder, in which the management involves daily intake of thyroxine. However, adherence to a daily medication regimen po...
S5. DOES THE TIME OF DRUG ADMINISTRATION ALTER THE ADVERSE EVENT RISK OF LURASIDONE?
S5. DOES THE TIME OF DRUG ADMINISTRATION ALTER THE ADVERSE EVENT RISK OF LURASIDONE?
Abstract
Background
Lurasidone is once a day oral medication, which could be administered any time of the day, but the relations...

