Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

An artificial intelligence-designed predictive calculator of conversion from minimally invasive to open colectomy in colon cancer

View through CrossRef
AbstractMinimally invasive surgery is safe and effective in colorectal cancer. Conversion to open surgery may be associated with adverse effects on treatment outcomes. This study aimed to assess risk factors of conversion from minimally invasive to open colectomy for colon cancer and impact of conversion on short-term and survival outcomes. This case–control study included colon cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive colectomy from the National Cancer Database (2015–2019). Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine independent predictors of conversion from laparoscopic and robotic colectomy to open surgery. 26,546 patients (mean age: 66.9 ± 13.1 years) were included. Laparoscopic and robotic colectomies were performed in 79.1% and 20.9% of patients, respectively, with a 10.6% conversion rate. Independent predictors of conversion were male sex (OR: 1.19, p = 0.014), left-sided cancer (OR: 1.35, p < 0.001), tumor size (OR: 1, p = 0.047), stage II (OR: 1.25, p = 0.007) and stage III (OR: 1.47, p < 0.001) disease, undifferentiated carcinomas (OR: 1.93, p = 0.002), subtotal (OR: 1.25, p = 0.011) and total (OR: 2.06, p < 0.001) colectomy, resection of contiguous organs (OR: 1.9, p < 0.001), and robotic colectomy (OR: 0.501, p < 0.001). Conversion was associated with higher 30- and 90-day mortality and unplanned readmission, longer hospital stay, and shorter overall survival (59.8 vs 65.3 months, p < 0.001). Male patients, patients with bulky, high-grade, advanced-stage, and left-sided colon cancers, and patients undergoing extended resections are at increased risk of conversion from minimally invasive to open colectomy. The robotic platform was associated with reduced odds of conversion. However, surgeons’ technical skills and criteria for conversion could not be assessed.
Title: An artificial intelligence-designed predictive calculator of conversion from minimally invasive to open colectomy in colon cancer
Description:
AbstractMinimally invasive surgery is safe and effective in colorectal cancer.
Conversion to open surgery may be associated with adverse effects on treatment outcomes.
This study aimed to assess risk factors of conversion from minimally invasive to open colectomy for colon cancer and impact of conversion on short-term and survival outcomes.
This case–control study included colon cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive colectomy from the National Cancer Database (2015–2019).
Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine independent predictors of conversion from laparoscopic and robotic colectomy to open surgery.
26,546 patients (mean age: 66.
9 ± 13.
1 years) were included.
Laparoscopic and robotic colectomies were performed in 79.
1% and 20.
9% of patients, respectively, with a 10.
6% conversion rate.
Independent predictors of conversion were male sex (OR: 1.
19, p = 0.
014), left-sided cancer (OR: 1.
35, p < 0.
001), tumor size (OR: 1, p = 0.
047), stage II (OR: 1.
25, p = 0.
007) and stage III (OR: 1.
47, p < 0.
001) disease, undifferentiated carcinomas (OR: 1.
93, p = 0.
002), subtotal (OR: 1.
25, p = 0.
011) and total (OR: 2.
06, p < 0.
001) colectomy, resection of contiguous organs (OR: 1.
9, p < 0.
001), and robotic colectomy (OR: 0.
501, p < 0.
001).
Conversion was associated with higher 30- and 90-day mortality and unplanned readmission, longer hospital stay, and shorter overall survival (59.
8 vs 65.
3 months, p < 0.
001).
Male patients, patients with bulky, high-grade, advanced-stage, and left-sided colon cancers, and patients undergoing extended resections are at increased risk of conversion from minimally invasive to open colectomy.
The robotic platform was associated with reduced odds of conversion.
However, surgeons’ technical skills and criteria for conversion could not be assessed.

Related Results

Atypical Sigmoid Volvulus in an Adolescent: A Case Report and Literature Review
Atypical Sigmoid Volvulus in an Adolescent: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Sigmoid volvulus is an underrecognized diagnosis with potentially fatal outcomes in adolescents; the current study aims to present an adolescent with mild sym...
Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery or open surgery for Colon Resection: A long-standing dilemma
Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery or open surgery for Colon Resection: A long-standing dilemma
Dear Madam, Ccolon resection (colectomy) is the surgical removal of diseased sections of the colon due to their underlying etiology, which may be in the form of colon cancer, preca...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Quantification of Micrornas by Absolute Dpcr for the Diagnostic Screening of Colon Cancer
Quantification of Micrornas by Absolute Dpcr for the Diagnostic Screening of Colon Cancer
There is currently no validated micro(mi)RNA diagnostic stool test to screen for colon cancer (CC) on the market because of the complexity of fecal density, vulnerability of stool ...
Comparing Emergent and Elective Colectomy Outcomes in Elderly Patients: A NSQIP Study
Comparing Emergent and Elective Colectomy Outcomes in Elderly Patients: A NSQIP Study
Introduction. With the increasing prevalence of colorectal cancer (CRC) worldwide, especially in the elderly, and the variability between physiological and chronological age and it...

Back to Top