Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Geochemical Archives in Lake Deposits
View through CrossRef
As we saw in chapter 4, the isotopic, elemental, or molecular constituents of a lake and its sediments reflect both external chemical inputs and the lake’s internal biogeochemical cycles. Lake sediment geochemistry is the product of interactions between these external inputs from watershed geology, groundwater, vegetation, and the airshed, and internal lake processes. Both external and internal inputs are heavily influenced by climate, and for the past few thousand years, human activities. With careful consideration of the various information filters affecting their records, geochemists can greatly broaden the scope of questions that can be addressed using paleolimnology. It is of critical importance when interpreting chemical data, that it be placed in the context of other sedimentological or paleontological archives. With modern, automated techniques, it is possible to amass large amounts of geochemical data in a relatively short time, data that can be compiled into deceptively ‘‘simple’’ geochemical profiles. Perhaps more than any other types of indicator, geochemical profiles are often interpreted as standalone records, without reference to petrographical, or even gross lithofacies information. Although it is tempting to read chemical stratigraphies as a direct record of inputs from a watershed or airshed, the signals are blurred by the whole host of messy, internal processes that we have already encountered in the hydroclimate filter: lag and residence time effects, reworking, particle and redox focusing, organismal uptake, and bioturbation. Lake deposits integrate local changes in source conditions, background sedimentation rates, and geochemical focusing processes (Engstrom and Swain, 1986). As a result, different locations within a lake may provide different geochemical histories, and interpretations of an integrated lake history must take into account these internal variations and their probable causes. This is always harder to do with paleolake deposits, where the original basin morphometry and hydrology is obscure. In this chapter we will also consider postdepositional information filters that affect geochemical archives, in particular bioturbation and diagenesis. Because many geochemical components of interest to paleolimnologists are bound to fine-grained particles, they can be readily mixed by bioturbation.
Title: Geochemical Archives in Lake Deposits
Description:
As we saw in chapter 4, the isotopic, elemental, or molecular constituents of a lake and its sediments reflect both external chemical inputs and the lake’s internal biogeochemical cycles.
Lake sediment geochemistry is the product of interactions between these external inputs from watershed geology, groundwater, vegetation, and the airshed, and internal lake processes.
Both external and internal inputs are heavily influenced by climate, and for the past few thousand years, human activities.
With careful consideration of the various information filters affecting their records, geochemists can greatly broaden the scope of questions that can be addressed using paleolimnology.
It is of critical importance when interpreting chemical data, that it be placed in the context of other sedimentological or paleontological archives.
With modern, automated techniques, it is possible to amass large amounts of geochemical data in a relatively short time, data that can be compiled into deceptively ‘‘simple’’ geochemical profiles.
Perhaps more than any other types of indicator, geochemical profiles are often interpreted as standalone records, without reference to petrographical, or even gross lithofacies information.
Although it is tempting to read chemical stratigraphies as a direct record of inputs from a watershed or airshed, the signals are blurred by the whole host of messy, internal processes that we have already encountered in the hydroclimate filter: lag and residence time effects, reworking, particle and redox focusing, organismal uptake, and bioturbation.
Lake deposits integrate local changes in source conditions, background sedimentation rates, and geochemical focusing processes (Engstrom and Swain, 1986).
As a result, different locations within a lake may provide different geochemical histories, and interpretations of an integrated lake history must take into account these internal variations and their probable causes.
This is always harder to do with paleolake deposits, where the original basin morphometry and hydrology is obscure.
In this chapter we will also consider postdepositional information filters that affect geochemical archives, in particular bioturbation and diagenesis.
Because many geochemical components of interest to paleolimnologists are bound to fine-grained particles, they can be readily mixed by bioturbation.
Related Results
Outlier ice deposits at the poles of Mars as young climate records
Outlier ice deposits at the poles of Mars as young climate records
Introduction: The Polar Layered Deposits (PLDs) at the poles of Mars are believed to preserve a paleoclimate record that reflects the climate at the time of their formation [1]. Du...
Geomorphology of the lakebed and sediment deposition during the Holocene in Lake Visovac
Geomorphology of the lakebed and sediment deposition during the Holocene in Lake Visovac
<p>Lake Visovac is a tufa barrier lake on the Krka River between Ro&#353;ki slap (60 m asl) and Skradinski buk (46 m absl) waterfalls, included in the Krka na...
A Preliminary Review of the Metallogenic Regularity of Nickel Deposits in China
A Preliminary Review of the Metallogenic Regularity of Nickel Deposits in China
AbstractThe nickel deposits mainly distributed in 19 provinces and autonomous regions in China are 339 ore deposits/occurrences, including 4 super large‐scale deposits, 14 large‐sc...
Geology of Seattle and the Seattle area, Washington
Geology of Seattle and the Seattle area, Washington
Abstract
The city of Seattle, Washington State, lies within the Puget Sound Lowland, an elongate structural and topographic basin between the Cascade Range and Olymp...
Distribution Characteristics and Metallogenic Regularity of Graphite Deposits in Qinling Orogen, China
Distribution Characteristics and Metallogenic Regularity of Graphite Deposits in Qinling Orogen, China
AbstractQinling orogen is one of the five main repository distribution provinces of large scale graphite resources. Graphite occurrence strata are multitudinous including NeoArchae...
Evolution of an Ancient Large Lake in the Southeast of the Northern Tibetan Plateau
Evolution of an Ancient Large Lake in the Southeast of the Northern Tibetan Plateau
Abstract Nam Co is the largest (1920 km2 in area) and highest (4718 m above sea level) lake in Tibet. According to the discovery of lake terraces and highstand lacustrine deposits...
Iron oxide copper-gold (IOCG) deposits – A review (part 1): Settings, mineralogy, ore geochemistry and classification
Iron oxide copper-gold (IOCG) deposits – A review (part 1): Settings, mineralogy, ore geochemistry and classification
Characteristics of ten of the world’s metallogenic provinces hosting iron oxide Cu-Au (IOCG) deposits have been critically assessed, including their geological and tectonothermal e...
Rare Earth Deposits of North America
Rare Earth Deposits of North America
AbstractRare earth elements (REE) have been mined in North America since 1885, when placer monazite was produced in the southeast USA. Since the 1960s, however, most North American...

