Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Effects of intranasal and intramuscular dexmedetomidine in cats receiving total intravenous propofol anesthesia

View through CrossRef
Background and Aim: The efficacy of intranasal (IN) dexmedetomidine in cats as a premedication remains elusive. Thus, this study aimed to compare the perioperative and sparing effects of IN and intramuscular (IM) dexmedetomidine administration on propofol requirements for anesthetic induction in cats. Materials and Methods: This study randomly assigned 16 cats into two groups of IN or IM dexmedetomidine at 20 μg/kg. Sedation scores and side effects were recorded at time points of 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min after the dexmedetomidine administration. Anesthesia was induced with intravenous (IV) 1% propofol by titrating a bolus of 2 mg every 45 s and the total dose of the administered IV propofol to achieve endotracheal intubation was recorded. Results: Cats receiving IM dexmedetomidine were significantly associated with higher sedation scores. All cats were sedated at 20 min after premedication; however, the average composite sedation scores in the IN group were significantly lower than those in the IM group during premedication. Pre-operative side effects, including vomiting, were more frequently observed in the IN group (5 cats, 62.5%) than in the IM group (3 cats, 37.5%; p < 0.05). Higher body temperature (>1°F compared to baseline) was more frequently observed in the IN group (6 cats, 75.0%) than in the IM group (1 cat, 12.5%; p < 0.05). The dosage of required propofol in the IN group was significantly higher (1.1 ± 0.3 mg/kg) than that in the IM group (0.7 ± 0.2 mg/kg; p < 0.05). The duration of general anesthesia was comparable between the groups. Conclusion: IN dexmedetomidine produces moderate sedation and cats may have side effects, including vomiting and higher body temperature. Higher sparing effects of propofol were identified in the IM group compared with the IN group. Nonetheless, IN administration of dexmedetomidine provides a noninvasive alternative to the IM route.
Title: Effects of intranasal and intramuscular dexmedetomidine in cats receiving total intravenous propofol anesthesia
Description:
Background and Aim: The efficacy of intranasal (IN) dexmedetomidine in cats as a premedication remains elusive.
Thus, this study aimed to compare the perioperative and sparing effects of IN and intramuscular (IM) dexmedetomidine administration on propofol requirements for anesthetic induction in cats.
Materials and Methods: This study randomly assigned 16 cats into two groups of IN or IM dexmedetomidine at 20 μg/kg.
Sedation scores and side effects were recorded at time points of 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min after the dexmedetomidine administration.
Anesthesia was induced with intravenous (IV) 1% propofol by titrating a bolus of 2 mg every 45 s and the total dose of the administered IV propofol to achieve endotracheal intubation was recorded.
Results: Cats receiving IM dexmedetomidine were significantly associated with higher sedation scores.
All cats were sedated at 20 min after premedication; however, the average composite sedation scores in the IN group were significantly lower than those in the IM group during premedication.
Pre-operative side effects, including vomiting, were more frequently observed in the IN group (5 cats, 62.
5%) than in the IM group (3 cats, 37.
5%; p < 0.
05).
Higher body temperature (>1°F compared to baseline) was more frequently observed in the IN group (6 cats, 75.
0%) than in the IM group (1 cat, 12.
5%; p < 0.
05).
The dosage of required propofol in the IN group was significantly higher (1.
1 ± 0.
3 mg/kg) than that in the IM group (0.
7 ± 0.
2 mg/kg; p < 0.
05).
The duration of general anesthesia was comparable between the groups.
Conclusion: IN dexmedetomidine produces moderate sedation and cats may have side effects, including vomiting and higher body temperature.
Higher sparing effects of propofol were identified in the IM group compared with the IN group.
Nonetheless, IN administration of dexmedetomidine provides a noninvasive alternative to the IM route.

Related Results

Significance and characteristics of Dexmedetomidine or Propofol-induced segmental electroencephalogram power spectra
Significance and characteristics of Dexmedetomidine or Propofol-induced segmental electroencephalogram power spectra
Abstract Background: Although the electroencephalogram patterns induced by dexmedetomidine and propofol are relatively similar, these drugs may have different molecular tar...
A Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine-Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine-Pentazocine for Monitored Anesthesia Care in Tympanoplasty
A Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine-Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine-Pentazocine for Monitored Anesthesia Care in Tympanoplasty
Background: Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) is increasingly being used in various surgical procedures due to its safety and effectiveness. Tympanoplasty, a common otological proced...
Dexmedetomidine Intranasal sebagai Premedikasi pada Pediatri
Dexmedetomidine Intranasal sebagai Premedikasi pada Pediatri
Pendahuluan: Pembedahan merupakan pengalaman yang sangat menegangkan bagi pasien terutama bagi anak-anak, karena anak yang paling rentan terhadap ketakutan, kecemasan dan stres, ha...

Back to Top