Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Limits of proof in criminal proceedings
View through CrossRef
Problem setting. Proving in criminal proceedings is evidence collection and research activity of special subjects of criminal proceedings. The specific purpose of prooving is to obtain knowledge that is close to reality. To achieve this purpose, the theory of criminal procedure operates with the concept of “limits of proof”. In view of the above, it is important to study this phenomenon, because, firstly, there is no legislative regulation, and secondly, there is no unity in the theory of criminal procedure on this issue.
Target research. The aim of the work is to define the concept of the limits of proof; to find out the moment of reaching the limits of proof and cases of narrowing and expanding the limits of proof; to analyze case law on this issue.
Analysis of recent research and publication. The question of determining the limits of proof, their relationship with the subject of prooving has been the subject of scientific research. In particular, the works of such researchers in the field of criminal procedure as A.R. Belkin, V.V. Vapnarchuk, G.F. Gorsky, Yu.M. Groshev, V.S. Zelenetsky, E.G. Kovalenko, L.D. Kokorev, R.V. Kostenko, R.D. Rakhunov, В.В. Rozhnov, V.G. Tanasovich, F.N. Fatkullin, A.A. Khmirov deserve attention.
Article’s main body. The article discusses the concept and significance of the limits of proof in criminal proceedings, analyzes the differences between them and other procedural categories, and analyzes doctrinal developments regarding the criteria for reaching boundaries and judicial practice in cases of expanding or narrowing the limits of proof.
Conclusions and prospect of development. Thus, the study allows us to state that the concept of the limits of proof in criminal proceedings is multifaceted and important because it aims to achieve fair trial. The limits of proof are individual for each specific criminal proceeding, and an important criterion for determining it is the standard of proof of guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt”. That is why the future study of this phenomenon in criminal proceedings becomes relevant due to the need to bring national criminal proceedings closer to European standards of justice.
Scientific and Research Institute of Providing Legal Framework for the Innovative Development
Title: Limits of proof in criminal proceedings
Description:
Problem setting.
Proving in criminal proceedings is evidence collection and research activity of special subjects of criminal proceedings.
The specific purpose of prooving is to obtain knowledge that is close to reality.
To achieve this purpose, the theory of criminal procedure operates with the concept of “limits of proof”.
In view of the above, it is important to study this phenomenon, because, firstly, there is no legislative regulation, and secondly, there is no unity in the theory of criminal procedure on this issue.
Target research.
The aim of the work is to define the concept of the limits of proof; to find out the moment of reaching the limits of proof and cases of narrowing and expanding the limits of proof; to analyze case law on this issue.
Analysis of recent research and publication.
The question of determining the limits of proof, their relationship with the subject of prooving has been the subject of scientific research.
In particular, the works of such researchers in the field of criminal procedure as A.
R.
Belkin, V.
V.
Vapnarchuk, G.
F.
Gorsky, Yu.
M.
Groshev, V.
S.
Zelenetsky, E.
G.
Kovalenko, L.
D.
Kokorev, R.
V.
Kostenko, R.
D.
Rakhunov, В.
В.
Rozhnov, V.
G.
Tanasovich, F.
N.
Fatkullin, A.
A.
Khmirov deserve attention.
Article’s main body.
The article discusses the concept and significance of the limits of proof in criminal proceedings, analyzes the differences between them and other procedural categories, and analyzes doctrinal developments regarding the criteria for reaching boundaries and judicial practice in cases of expanding or narrowing the limits of proof.
Conclusions and prospect of development.
Thus, the study allows us to state that the concept of the limits of proof in criminal proceedings is multifaceted and important because it aims to achieve fair trial.
The limits of proof are individual for each specific criminal proceeding, and an important criterion for determining it is the standard of proof of guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt”.
That is why the future study of this phenomenon in criminal proceedings becomes relevant due to the need to bring national criminal proceedings closer to European standards of justice.
Related Results
THE EXISTENCE OF CRIMINAL LAW IN NATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW REFORM
THE EXISTENCE OF CRIMINAL LAW IN NATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW REFORM
The problem of reforming criminal law is one of the impo important issues that need in all its aspects in connection with efforts to reform criminal law in our country. It is said ...
On the issue of qualification of criminal offence connected to domestic violence
On the issue of qualification of criminal offence connected to domestic violence
The article deals with the issue of considering the fact that a person has a criminal record on criminal offence connected with domestic violence as a part of the ‘systematic natur...
Tactics of seizing electronic assets obtained by criminal means in criminal proceedings
Tactics of seizing electronic assets obtained by criminal means in criminal proceedings
It has been established that the tactics of seizure of electronic assets obtained by criminal means in criminal proceedings is a set of scientific provisions and practical recommen...
Legal Principles for the Use of Special Knowledge while Investigating Murders
Legal Principles for the Use of Special Knowledge while Investigating Murders
Based on the analysis of the Constitution of Ukraine and the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine, the author has established the relationship between the general principles of crim...
Legal grounds and ethical conditions of alternative forms of criminal law conflict resolution in Russia
Legal grounds and ethical conditions of alternative forms of criminal law conflict resolution in Russia
The article’s primary purpose is to reveal the potential of alternative forms of resolution of criminal law conflict in Russia’s criminal and criminal procedure legislation. The sc...
On free proof and regulated proof
On free proof and regulated proof
Free proof and regulated proof are two basic modes of judicial proof. The system of ‘legal proof’ established in France in the 16th century is a classical model of regulated proof....
SISTEM PIDANA DAN PEMIDANAAN DI DALAM PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA
SISTEM PIDANA DAN PEMIDANAAN DI DALAM PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA
Renewal of criminal law in the context of improving the punishment system is still continuing. Of the many things to be updated, one important thing in the penal system is also cru...
Criminal Compliance in Brazilian Corporate Criminal Law: A Theoretical Analysis
Criminal Compliance in Brazilian Corporate Criminal Law: A Theoretical Analysis
With the establishment of compliance rules, a penal bias known as criminal compliance has emerged. This paper focuses on the institute of criminal compliance, which aims to prevent...


