Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Simulating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings With Random Measure Weights
View through CrossRef
ImportanceHospital ratings including the US News & World Report’s Best Hospitals rankings and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS’) Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating (Overall Star Rating) measure different outcomes and are weakly correlated. Therefore, methods for defining and measuring reliable excellence, defined as consistently great performance across all quality measures, are needed.ObjectiveTo assess a measure of reliable excellence using the 45 quality measures reported in the Overall Star Ratings.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study used hospital-level data from the 2023 and 2024 CMS Overall Star Ratings at all US hospitals with a 2023 and 2024 CMS Overall Star Rating.ExposuresThe exposure was the CMS Overall Star Rating summary score, a continuous variable calculated from the weighted z scores of 45 quality measures used in the Overall Star Rating. A total of 100 000 simulations were run in which all US hospitals’ CMS Overall Star Rating summary scores were calculated through summation of z scores from randomly generated measure weights, as opposed to the existing weights used in the Overall Star Rating method.Main Outcomes and MeasuresReliable excellence, defined as achieving a 90th percentile (or better) CMS Overall Star Rating summary score on at least 50 000 of 100 000 simulations. The percentage of hospitals achieving reliable excellence was calculated both overall and stratified by CMS Ovearll Star Ratings.ResultsThere were 2700 hospitals in the analysis, with 335 5-star hospitals (12.4%), 727 4-star hospitals (26.9%), 799 3-star hospitals (29.6%), 572 2-star hospitals (21.2%), and 267 1-star hospitals (9.9%) in the 2024 CMS Overall Star Rating. A total of 244 of 2700 hospitals (9.0%) met the study definition of reliable excellence, whereas 1287 of 2700 hospitals (47.7%) achieved excellence in at least 1 simulation.Conclusions and RelevanceThis cross-sectional study of 2700 US hospitals found that only 244 hospitals (9.0%), including less than two-thirds of the CMS 5-star rated hospitals, were reliably excellent across 100 000 CMS Overall Star Rating scoring simulations using random measure weightings. These findings lend credence to the ubiquity of inconsistent greatness in health care quality and illuminate the need for methods to distinguish hospitals that provide reliably excellent care.
American Medical Association (AMA)
Title: Simulating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings With Random Measure Weights
Description:
ImportanceHospital ratings including the US News & World Report’s Best Hospitals rankings and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS’) Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating (Overall Star Rating) measure different outcomes and are weakly correlated.
Therefore, methods for defining and measuring reliable excellence, defined as consistently great performance across all quality measures, are needed.
ObjectiveTo assess a measure of reliable excellence using the 45 quality measures reported in the Overall Star Ratings.
Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study used hospital-level data from the 2023 and 2024 CMS Overall Star Ratings at all US hospitals with a 2023 and 2024 CMS Overall Star Rating.
ExposuresThe exposure was the CMS Overall Star Rating summary score, a continuous variable calculated from the weighted z scores of 45 quality measures used in the Overall Star Rating.
A total of 100 000 simulations were run in which all US hospitals’ CMS Overall Star Rating summary scores were calculated through summation of z scores from randomly generated measure weights, as opposed to the existing weights used in the Overall Star Rating method.
Main Outcomes and MeasuresReliable excellence, defined as achieving a 90th percentile (or better) CMS Overall Star Rating summary score on at least 50 000 of 100 000 simulations.
The percentage of hospitals achieving reliable excellence was calculated both overall and stratified by CMS Ovearll Star Ratings.
ResultsThere were 2700 hospitals in the analysis, with 335 5-star hospitals (12.
4%), 727 4-star hospitals (26.
9%), 799 3-star hospitals (29.
6%), 572 2-star hospitals (21.
2%), and 267 1-star hospitals (9.
9%) in the 2024 CMS Overall Star Rating.
A total of 244 of 2700 hospitals (9.
0%) met the study definition of reliable excellence, whereas 1287 of 2700 hospitals (47.
7%) achieved excellence in at least 1 simulation.
Conclusions and RelevanceThis cross-sectional study of 2700 US hospitals found that only 244 hospitals (9.
0%), including less than two-thirds of the CMS 5-star rated hospitals, were reliably excellent across 100 000 CMS Overall Star Rating scoring simulations using random measure weightings.
These findings lend credence to the ubiquity of inconsistent greatness in health care quality and illuminate the need for methods to distinguish hospitals that provide reliably excellent care.
Related Results
A Red Light Sabre to Go, and Other Histories of the Present
A Red Light Sabre to Go, and Other Histories of the Present
If I find out that you have bought a $90 red light sabre, Tara, well there's going to be trouble. -- Kevin Brabazon
A few Saturdays ago, my 71-year old father tried to...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Consistency of perceiving odors: Inter- and Intra- Individual Differences in Odor Similarity Ratings
Consistency of perceiving odors: Inter- and Intra- Individual Differences in Odor Similarity Ratings
This study conducted odor pair similarity ratings twice and used the replicability of the ratings, as indicated by the correlation coefficients between the two sets of ratings, to ...
Early Effects of Home Health Value-Based Purchasing on Quality Star Ratings
Early Effects of Home Health Value-Based Purchasing on Quality Star Ratings
The Home Health Value-Based Purchasing Model (HHVBP) is a new Medicare model wherein home health agencies compete to achieve higher reimbursements by demonstrating improved value a...
John Williams to Non-Williams
John Williams to Non-Williams
John Williams may have dominion over the Star Wars film scores with eighteen hours of music across nine films, but the mantle of responsibility for the Star Wars musical canon en m...
AN ENIGMA OF THE PRZYBYLSKI STAR
AN ENIGMA OF THE PRZYBYLSKI STAR
A new scenario to explain the Przybylski star phenomenon is proposed. It is based on the supposition that this star is a component of a binary system with a neutron star (similar t...
Counterfactual Decomposition of Movie Star Effects with Star Selection
Counterfactual Decomposition of Movie Star Effects with Star Selection
We investigate the effects of a movie star on the movie's opening week theater allocations and box office revenue. Because the pairing of a star and a movie involves a bilateral ma...
Vævning over gruber
Vævning over gruber
Pits, Looms, and Loom Pits? In the archaeological quarterly Skalk (1959, no 2), Mogens Ørsnes described "The Problem of the Hundred Holes," pits "large and small, shallow and deep"...

