Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Simulating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings With Random Measure Weights

View through CrossRef
ImportanceHospital ratings including the US News & World Report’s Best Hospitals rankings and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS’) Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating (Overall Star Rating) measure different outcomes and are weakly correlated. Therefore, methods for defining and measuring reliable excellence, defined as consistently great performance across all quality measures, are needed.ObjectiveTo assess a measure of reliable excellence using the 45 quality measures reported in the Overall Star Ratings.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study used hospital-level data from the 2023 and 2024 CMS Overall Star Ratings at all US hospitals with a 2023 and 2024 CMS Overall Star Rating.ExposuresThe exposure was the CMS Overall Star Rating summary score, a continuous variable calculated from the weighted z scores of 45 quality measures used in the Overall Star Rating. A total of 100 000 simulations were run in which all US hospitals’ CMS Overall Star Rating summary scores were calculated through summation of z scores from randomly generated measure weights, as opposed to the existing weights used in the Overall Star Rating method.Main Outcomes and MeasuresReliable excellence, defined as achieving a 90th percentile (or better) CMS Overall Star Rating summary score on at least 50 000 of 100 000 simulations. The percentage of hospitals achieving reliable excellence was calculated both overall and stratified by CMS Ovearll Star Ratings.ResultsThere were 2700 hospitals in the analysis, with 335 5-star hospitals (12.4%), 727 4-star hospitals (26.9%), 799 3-star hospitals (29.6%), 572 2-star hospitals (21.2%), and 267 1-star hospitals (9.9%) in the 2024 CMS Overall Star Rating. A total of 244 of 2700 hospitals (9.0%) met the study definition of reliable excellence, whereas 1287 of 2700 hospitals (47.7%) achieved excellence in at least 1 simulation.Conclusions and RelevanceThis cross-sectional study of 2700 US hospitals found that only 244 hospitals (9.0%), including less than two-thirds of the CMS 5-star rated hospitals, were reliably excellent across 100 000 CMS Overall Star Rating scoring simulations using random measure weightings. These findings lend credence to the ubiquity of inconsistent greatness in health care quality and illuminate the need for methods to distinguish hospitals that provide reliably excellent care.
Title: Simulating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings With Random Measure Weights
Description:
ImportanceHospital ratings including the US News & World Report’s Best Hospitals rankings and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS’) Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating (Overall Star Rating) measure different outcomes and are weakly correlated.
Therefore, methods for defining and measuring reliable excellence, defined as consistently great performance across all quality measures, are needed.
ObjectiveTo assess a measure of reliable excellence using the 45 quality measures reported in the Overall Star Ratings.
Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study used hospital-level data from the 2023 and 2024 CMS Overall Star Ratings at all US hospitals with a 2023 and 2024 CMS Overall Star Rating.
ExposuresThe exposure was the CMS Overall Star Rating summary score, a continuous variable calculated from the weighted z scores of 45 quality measures used in the Overall Star Rating.
A total of 100 000 simulations were run in which all US hospitals’ CMS Overall Star Rating summary scores were calculated through summation of z scores from randomly generated measure weights, as opposed to the existing weights used in the Overall Star Rating method.
Main Outcomes and MeasuresReliable excellence, defined as achieving a 90th percentile (or better) CMS Overall Star Rating summary score on at least 50 000 of 100 000 simulations.
The percentage of hospitals achieving reliable excellence was calculated both overall and stratified by CMS Ovearll Star Ratings.
ResultsThere were 2700 hospitals in the analysis, with 335 5-star hospitals (12.
4%), 727 4-star hospitals (26.
9%), 799 3-star hospitals (29.
6%), 572 2-star hospitals (21.
2%), and 267 1-star hospitals (9.
9%) in the 2024 CMS Overall Star Rating.
A total of 244 of 2700 hospitals (9.
0%) met the study definition of reliable excellence, whereas 1287 of 2700 hospitals (47.
7%) achieved excellence in at least 1 simulation.
Conclusions and RelevanceThis cross-sectional study of 2700 US hospitals found that only 244 hospitals (9.
0%), including less than two-thirds of the CMS 5-star rated hospitals, were reliably excellent across 100 000 CMS Overall Star Rating scoring simulations using random measure weightings.
These findings lend credence to the ubiquity of inconsistent greatness in health care quality and illuminate the need for methods to distinguish hospitals that provide reliably excellent care.

Related Results

A Red Light Sabre to Go, and Other Histories of the Present
A Red Light Sabre to Go, and Other Histories of the Present
If I find out that you have bought a $90 red light sabre, Tara, well there's going to be trouble. -- Kevin Brabazon A few Saturdays ago, my 71-year old father tried to...
Development and Performance Characterization Of Colour Star Trackers
Development and Performance Characterization Of Colour Star Trackers
Star trackers provide an essential component to a satellite mission requiring high-precision and high-accuracy attitude measurements. A star tracker operates by taking pictures of ...
Development and Performance Characterization Of Colour Star Trackers
Development and Performance Characterization Of Colour Star Trackers
Star trackers provide an essential component to a satellite mission requiring high-precision and high-accuracy attitude measurements. A star tracker operates by taking pictures of ...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Hot and Easy in Florida: The Case of Economics Professors
Hot and Easy in Florida: The Case of Economics Professors
The objective of this study is threefold. First, we seek to investigate whether overall quality ratings recorded by students on RateMyProfessors.com (henceforth RMP) are positively...
Machine Learning using Graph Neural Networks for Star Identification in Celestial Navigation
Machine Learning using Graph Neural Networks for Star Identification in Celestial Navigation
Contemporary maritime, aviation and space operations depend heavily on Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) such that deliberate spoofing or jamming, natural phenomena, and ev...
Early Effects of Home Health Value-Based Purchasing on Quality Star Ratings
Early Effects of Home Health Value-Based Purchasing on Quality Star Ratings
The Home Health Value-Based Purchasing Model (HHVBP) is a new Medicare model wherein home health agencies compete to achieve higher reimbursements by demonstrating improved value a...
Consistency of perceiving odors: Inter- and Intra- Individual Differences in Odor Similarity Ratings
Consistency of perceiving odors: Inter- and Intra- Individual Differences in Odor Similarity Ratings
This study conducted odor pair similarity ratings twice and used the replicability of the ratings, as indicated by the correlation coefficients between the two sets of ratings, to ...

Back to Top