Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Avionics System Architecture for the NASA Orion Vehicle

View through CrossRef
<div class="htmlview paragraph">It has been 30 years since the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) last developed a crewed spacecraft capable of launch, on-orbit operations, and landing. During that time, aerospace avionics technologies have greatly advanced in capability, and these technologies have enabled integrated avionics architectures for aerospace applications. The inception of NASA's Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) spacecraft offers the opportunity to leverage the latest integrated avionics technologies into crewed space vehicle architecture. The outstanding question is to what extent to implement these advances in avionics while still meeting the unique crewed spaceflight requirements for safety, reliability and maintainability.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">Historically, aircraft and spacecraft have very similar avionics requirements. Both aircraft and spacecraft must have high reliability. They also must have as much computing power as possible and provide low latency between user control and effecter response while minimizing weight, volume, and power. However, there are several key differences between aircraft and spacecraft avionics. Typically, the overall spacecraft operational time is much shorter than aircraft operation time, but the typical mission time (and hence, the time between preventive maintenance) is longer for a spacecraft than an aircraft. Also, the radiation environment is typically more severe for spacecraft than aircraft. A “loss of mission” scenario (i.e. - the mission is not a success, but there are no casualties) arguably has a greater impact on a multi-million dollar spaceflight mission than a typical commercial flight. Such differences need to be weighted when determining if an aircraft-like integrated modular avionics (IMA) system is suitable for a crewed spacecraft.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">This paper will explore the preliminary design process of the Orion vehicle avionics system by first identifying the Orion driving requirements and the difference between Orion requirements and those of other previous crewed spacecraft avionics systems. Common systems engineering methods will be used to evaluate the value propositions, or the factors that weight most heavily in design consideration, of Orion and other aerospace systems. Then, the current Orion avionics architecture will be presented and evaluated.</div>
Title: Avionics System Architecture for the NASA Orion Vehicle
Description:
<div class="htmlview paragraph">It has been 30 years since the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) last developed a crewed spacecraft capable of launch, on-orbit operations, and landing.
During that time, aerospace avionics technologies have greatly advanced in capability, and these technologies have enabled integrated avionics architectures for aerospace applications.
The inception of NASA's Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) spacecraft offers the opportunity to leverage the latest integrated avionics technologies into crewed space vehicle architecture.
The outstanding question is to what extent to implement these advances in avionics while still meeting the unique crewed spaceflight requirements for safety, reliability and maintainability.
</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">Historically, aircraft and spacecraft have very similar avionics requirements.
Both aircraft and spacecraft must have high reliability.
They also must have as much computing power as possible and provide low latency between user control and effecter response while minimizing weight, volume, and power.
However, there are several key differences between aircraft and spacecraft avionics.
Typically, the overall spacecraft operational time is much shorter than aircraft operation time, but the typical mission time (and hence, the time between preventive maintenance) is longer for a spacecraft than an aircraft.
Also, the radiation environment is typically more severe for spacecraft than aircraft.
A “loss of mission” scenario (i.
e.
- the mission is not a success, but there are no casualties) arguably has a greater impact on a multi-million dollar spaceflight mission than a typical commercial flight.
Such differences need to be weighted when determining if an aircraft-like integrated modular avionics (IMA) system is suitable for a crewed spacecraft.
</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">This paper will explore the preliminary design process of the Orion vehicle avionics system by first identifying the Orion driving requirements and the difference between Orion requirements and those of other previous crewed spacecraft avionics systems.
Common systems engineering methods will be used to evaluate the value propositions, or the factors that weight most heavily in design consideration, of Orion and other aerospace systems.
Then, the current Orion avionics architecture will be presented and evaluated.
</div>.

Related Results

FUNCTIONAL DAMAGE OF RADIO ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS
FUNCTIONAL DAMAGE OF RADIO ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS
Purpose: The most important problem of any state is protection of the control and management systems used for the country, national armed forces, high-risk facilities (nuclear powe...
Mathematical Programming for Optimization of Integrated Modular Avionics
Mathematical Programming for Optimization of Integrated Modular Avionics
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Every state-of-art aircraft has a complex distributed systems of avionics Line Replaceable Units/Modules (...
A 3D View of Orion: I. Barnard’s Loop
A 3D View of Orion: I. Barnard’s Loop
Barnard’s Loop is a famous arc of H\alpha emission located in the Orion star-forming region. Here, we provide evidence of a possible formation mechanism for Barnard’s Loop and comp...
The architecture of differences
The architecture of differences
Following in the footsteps of the protagonists of the Italian architectural debate is a mark of culture and proactivity. The synthesis deriving from the artistic-humanistic factors...
Defensive Avionics for Fighter Aircraft - Design Considerations With Emphasis on System Installation
Defensive Avionics for Fighter Aircraft - Design Considerations With Emphasis on System Installation
A fighter aircraft is vulnerable to precision radar guided weapons of the adversary Air Defences. The aircraft survivability can be enhanced only by equipping it with modern Defens...
NASA Planetary Science and European Partnerships and Participations
NASA Planetary Science and European Partnerships and Participations
&lt;p&gt;NASA&amp;#8217;s Planetary Science Division (PSD) and space agencies around the world are collaborating on an extensive array of missions exploring our Solar S...
Aerospace Avionics Systems
Aerospace Avionics Systems
AbstractAvionics systems have become the information backbone of modern Aerospace systems ranging from micro‐air vehicle and nano‐satellite to jumbo jet and advanced spacecraft. Wi...

Back to Top