Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Event-Related Brain Potentials N140 and P300 during Somatosensory Go/NoGo Tasks Are Modulated by Movement Preparation
View through CrossRef
The Go/NoGo task requires attention and sensory processing to distinguish a motor action cue or ‘Go stimulus’ from a ‘NoGo stimulus’ requiring no action, as well as motor preparation for a rapid Go stimulus response. The neural activity mediating these response phases can be examined non-invasively by measuring specific event-related brain potentials (ERPs) using electroencephalography. However, it is critical to determine how different task conditions, such as the relationship between attention site and movement site, influence ERPs and task performance. In this study, we compared attention-associated ERP components N140 and P300, the performance metrics reaction time (RT) and accuracy (%Error) and movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) between Go/NoGo task trials in which attention target and movement site were the same (right index finger movement in response to right index finger stimulation) or different (right index finger movement in response to fifth finger stimulation). In other Count trials, participants kept a running count of target stimuli presented but did not initiate a motor response. The N140 amplitudes at electrode site Cz were significantly larger in Movement trials than in Count trials regardless of the stimulation site–movement site condition. In contrast, the P300 amplitude at Cz was significantly smaller in Movement trials than in Count trials. The temporal windows of N140 and P300 overlapped with the MRCP. This superposition may influence N140 and P300 through summation, possibly independent of changes in attentional allocation.
Title: Event-Related Brain Potentials N140 and P300 during Somatosensory Go/NoGo Tasks Are Modulated by Movement Preparation
Description:
The Go/NoGo task requires attention and sensory processing to distinguish a motor action cue or ‘Go stimulus’ from a ‘NoGo stimulus’ requiring no action, as well as motor preparation for a rapid Go stimulus response.
The neural activity mediating these response phases can be examined non-invasively by measuring specific event-related brain potentials (ERPs) using electroencephalography.
However, it is critical to determine how different task conditions, such as the relationship between attention site and movement site, influence ERPs and task performance.
In this study, we compared attention-associated ERP components N140 and P300, the performance metrics reaction time (RT) and accuracy (%Error) and movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) between Go/NoGo task trials in which attention target and movement site were the same (right index finger movement in response to right index finger stimulation) or different (right index finger movement in response to fifth finger stimulation).
In other Count trials, participants kept a running count of target stimuli presented but did not initiate a motor response.
The N140 amplitudes at electrode site Cz were significantly larger in Movement trials than in Count trials regardless of the stimulation site–movement site condition.
In contrast, the P300 amplitude at Cz was significantly smaller in Movement trials than in Count trials.
The temporal windows of N140 and P300 overlapped with the MRCP.
This superposition may influence N140 and P300 through summation, possibly independent of changes in attentional allocation.
Related Results
Brain Organoids, the Path Forward?
Brain Organoids, the Path Forward?
Photo by Maxim Berg on Unsplash
INTRODUCTION
The brain is one of the most foundational parts of being human, and we are still learning about what makes humans unique. Advancements ...
The contribution of stimulus frequency and attention to the N2 and P3 in Go/Nogo: A multilab replication and new analyses
The contribution of stimulus frequency and attention to the N2 and P3 in Go/Nogo: A multilab replication and new analyses
Numerous EEG studies have found that stimuli that require withholding a response (Nogo stimuli) elicit two scalp-recorded event-related potentials (ERPs), the frontal N2 and the fr...
[RETRACTED] Gro-X Brain Reviews - Is Gro-X Brain A Scam? v1
[RETRACTED] Gro-X Brain Reviews - Is Gro-X Brain A Scam? v1
[RETRACTED]➢Item Name - Gro-X Brain➢ Creation - Natural Organic Compound➢ Incidental Effects - NA➢ Accessibility - Online➢ Rating - ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐➢ Click Here To Visit - Official Website - ...
P300 Energy Loss in Aging and Alzheimer's Disease
P300 Energy Loss in Aging and Alzheimer's Disease
The amplitude of the event-related potential P300 component is sensitive to aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Using a standard 20-electrode configuration, the P300 was measured d...
Evaluating the effectiveness of anti-Nogo treatment in spinal cord injuries
Evaluating the effectiveness of anti-Nogo treatment in spinal cord injuries
AbstractAs humans, we cannot regenerate axons within the central nervous system (CNS), therefore, making any damage to it permanent. This leads to the loss of sensory and motor fun...
Towards a somatosensory theory of speech perception
Towards a somatosensory theory of speech perception
Speech perception is known to be a multimodal process, relying not only on auditory input but also on the visual system and possibly on the motor system as well. To date there has ...
A novel EEG-based spelling system using N100 and P300
A novel EEG-based spelling system using N100 and P300
P300-speller is one of the most popular EEG-based spelling systems proposed by Farwell and Donchin. P300-speller has a 6×6 character matrix and requires at least 12 flash...
VALUE OF P300 AS A SCREENING TOOL OF COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT IN EPILEPSY: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY FROM INDIA
VALUE OF P300 AS A SCREENING TOOL OF COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT IN EPILEPSY: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY FROM INDIA
Objective. Preservation of cognition is essential for good quality life. Epileptic pathological processes and pharmacotherapy are thought to be responsible for the cognitive dysfun...

