Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Abstract 4365445: Scarcity of obesity specialists relative to obesity prevalence in US counties
View through CrossRef
Introduction:
Given the obesity epidemic, access to obesity specialists such as endocrinologists and obesity medicine physicians is paramount for adequate treatment to avoid long-term complications. However, geographic distribution of obesity specialists in United States (US) counties and its relationship with obesity prevalence is unclear.
Methods:
A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 3230 US counties categorized by metropolitan status (large central metropolitan, fringe central metropolitan, medium and small metropolitan, and nonmetropolitan). We merged data from the US Census, CDC Atlas, the NPI registry, American Community Survey, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the National Center of Health Statistics to form the dataset. 232 counties were excluded from our analysis due to incomplete data on the CDC Atlas (150 from continental US, 82 from US territories including Guam, the US Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico) to form a final study sample of 2998 counties. Predictors of obesity specialists per 100K adults with obesity by county was determined using regression analysis.
Results:
The median demographic composition of the 2,998 US counties is: 50.0% men, 82.3% White, with a median age of 41.6 years. The average percentage of adults with obesity per county was 28.3% (SD 6.5%) and the average number of obesity specialists per county was 5.0 (SD 14.8) per 100K adults with obesity per county. However, substantial variation exists by metropolitan status on the ratio of obesity specialists/100K adults with obesity per county, that ranged from 25.1 (SD 26.1) in large central metro, 8.4 (SD 20.1) in fringe metro, 9.5 (SD 20.8) in medium/small metro to 2.0 (SD 7.9) in non-metro counties, P<0.001 for trend. A total of 70.2% of US counties did not have obesity specialists (Figure 1). Regression modeling adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic status, and total number of physicians per county showed the independent predictors of obesity specialists in US counties to be education, household income, male sex, and nonmetropolitan status.
Conclusions:
Significant heterogeneity exists on access to obesity specialists across US counties, especially in nonmetropolitan counties, suggesting the need for more obesity specialists in our communities with inadequate access or the general upskilling of physicians who treat obesity.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Abstract 4365445: Scarcity of obesity specialists relative to obesity prevalence in US counties
Description:
Introduction:
Given the obesity epidemic, access to obesity specialists such as endocrinologists and obesity medicine physicians is paramount for adequate treatment to avoid long-term complications.
However, geographic distribution of obesity specialists in United States (US) counties and its relationship with obesity prevalence is unclear.
Methods:
A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 3230 US counties categorized by metropolitan status (large central metropolitan, fringe central metropolitan, medium and small metropolitan, and nonmetropolitan).
We merged data from the US Census, CDC Atlas, the NPI registry, American Community Survey, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the National Center of Health Statistics to form the dataset.
232 counties were excluded from our analysis due to incomplete data on the CDC Atlas (150 from continental US, 82 from US territories including Guam, the US Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico) to form a final study sample of 2998 counties.
Predictors of obesity specialists per 100K adults with obesity by county was determined using regression analysis.
Results:
The median demographic composition of the 2,998 US counties is: 50.
0% men, 82.
3% White, with a median age of 41.
6 years.
The average percentage of adults with obesity per county was 28.
3% (SD 6.
5%) and the average number of obesity specialists per county was 5.
0 (SD 14.
8) per 100K adults with obesity per county.
However, substantial variation exists by metropolitan status on the ratio of obesity specialists/100K adults with obesity per county, that ranged from 25.
1 (SD 26.
1) in large central metro, 8.
4 (SD 20.
1) in fringe metro, 9.
5 (SD 20.
8) in medium/small metro to 2.
0 (SD 7.
9) in non-metro counties, P<0.
001 for trend.
A total of 70.
2% of US counties did not have obesity specialists (Figure 1).
Regression modeling adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic status, and total number of physicians per county showed the independent predictors of obesity specialists in US counties to be education, household income, male sex, and nonmetropolitan status.
Conclusions:
Significant heterogeneity exists on access to obesity specialists across US counties, especially in nonmetropolitan counties, suggesting the need for more obesity specialists in our communities with inadequate access or the general upskilling of physicians who treat obesity.
Related Results
Spatial and temporal trends in social vulnerability and COVID-19 incidence and death rates in the United States
Spatial and temporal trends in social vulnerability and COVID-19 incidence and death rates in the United States
Abstract
Background
Emerging evidence suggests that socially vulnerable communities are at higher risk for coronavirus disease ...
Eating Habits Associated with Overweight and Obesity: Case - Control Study in 11-14 year old Adolescents in Hanoi in 2020
Eating Habits Associated with Overweight and Obesity: Case - Control Study in 11-14 year old Adolescents in Hanoi in 2020
Eating habits appears to be an important determinant of dietary intake and may consequently influence overweight and obesity. Understanding the relationship between the nutritional...
Is Rural Kansas Prepared? An Assessment of Resources Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic
Is Rural Kansas Prepared? An Assessment of Resources Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic
INTRODUCTION. This study investigated rural Kansas healthcare system capacity and critical care-related resources relevant to the care of COVID-19 patients in at the county level i...
Broadband Access and Health Outcomes in FCC Priority Counties: A Longitudinal Analysis
Broadband Access and Health Outcomes in FCC Priority Counties: A Longitudinal Analysis
Background: The relationship between broadband access and health outcomes is an emerging field of interest within public health research. In an increasingly digital world, it is im...
Modeling the Spatial Formation Mechanism of Poverty-Stricken Counties in China by Using Geographical Detector
Modeling the Spatial Formation Mechanism of Poverty-Stricken Counties in China by Using Geographical Detector
The poverty-stricken counties in China follow a spatial pattern of regional poverty. Examining the influential factors of this spatial pattern can provide an important reference th...
COVID-19 infections following outdoor mass gatherings in low incidence areas: retrospective cohort study
COVID-19 infections following outdoor mass gatherings in low incidence areas: retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Objective
Indoor mass gatherings in counties with high COVID-19 incidence have been linked to infections. We examined ...
Combining Clustering and Factor Analysis as Complementary Techniques
Combining Clustering and Factor Analysis as Complementary Techniques
The study of driver behavior and associated accidents has been of interest to researchers and insurance companies. From the perspective of insurance companies, identifying factors ...
Global overlooked multidimensional water scarcity
Global overlooked multidimensional water scarcity
Freshwater resources are fundamental to supporting humanity, and measures of water scarcity have been critical for identifying where water requirements and water availability are i...

