Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Upper mini‐sternotomy for aortic valve operations

View through CrossRef
Objective: To review our experience in using an upper mini‐sternotomy approach to aortic valve surgery. Materials and methods: Nineteen consecutive non‐selected patients (15 males, mean age 66 years) underwent isolated aortic valve replacement using an upper mini‐sternotomy approach. Twelve patients had isolated aortic valve stenosis, four patients had isolated aortic valve incompetence and three patients had mixed aortic valve disease. Results: In all cases, an excellent view of the aortic valve was obtained, aortic valve replacement was performed and no intra‐operative difficulties were encountered. Mean aortic cross‐clamp time was 83 min and mean cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion time was 97 min. All patients except two were extubated in the operating theatre and there were no major postoperative complications. Mean hospital stay was 4 days. There were no late complications. Conclusions: Aortic valve surgery can be performed, in the conventional manner and using standard surgical instruments, through an upper mini‐sternotomy with no alteration to cardiopulmonary bypass or myocardial protection routines.
Title: Upper mini‐sternotomy for aortic valve operations
Description:
Objective: To review our experience in using an upper mini‐sternotomy approach to aortic valve surgery.
Materials and methods: Nineteen consecutive non‐selected patients (15 males, mean age 66 years) underwent isolated aortic valve replacement using an upper mini‐sternotomy approach.
Twelve patients had isolated aortic valve stenosis, four patients had isolated aortic valve incompetence and three patients had mixed aortic valve disease.
Results: In all cases, an excellent view of the aortic valve was obtained, aortic valve replacement was performed and no intra‐operative difficulties were encountered.
Mean aortic cross‐clamp time was 83 min and mean cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion time was 97 min.
All patients except two were extubated in the operating theatre and there were no major postoperative complications.
Mean hospital stay was 4 days.
There were no late complications.
Conclusions: Aortic valve surgery can be performed, in the conventional manner and using standard surgical instruments, through an upper mini‐sternotomy with no alteration to cardiopulmonary bypass or myocardial protection routines.

Related Results

Comparative study between aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy versus mini-sternotomy
Comparative study between aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy versus mini-sternotomy
Background: The superiority of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) over the standard approach is the subject of ongoing research. The aim of this study was to compare...
Mini-sternotomy versuMini-sternotomy versuss conventional sternotomy in aortic valve replacement surgery; A comparative study
Mini-sternotomy versuMini-sternotomy versuss conventional sternotomy in aortic valve replacement surgery; A comparative study
Objectives: To assess safety; efficacy and efficiency of mini-sternotomy in aortic valve replacement in comparison to conventional sternotomy on short term follow up.Methods: This ...
Abstract 4369914: Successful Transfemoral TAVR in a Patient with Chronic Aortic Dissection and Severe Aortic Insufficiency
Abstract 4369914: Successful Transfemoral TAVR in a Patient with Chronic Aortic Dissection and Severe Aortic Insufficiency
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is a well-established treatment for high-surgical-risk patients with severe aortic disease, providing a less invasive alternative to traditio...
Partial versus Full Sternotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement
Partial versus Full Sternotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement
Background: Minimal invasive approaches are used more frequently for aortic valve replacement (AVR). This study aimed to compare the outcomes of both minimally invasive upper mini-...
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
Objectives To develop a relatively simple and effective and less risk operation, aortic root wrapped procedure, to treat with aortic root aneurysm or ectasia. ...
Aortic root wrapped procedure
Aortic root wrapped procedure
Objective To develop a relatively simple and effective and less risk operation, aortic root wrapped procedure, to treat with aortic root aneurysm or ectasia. ...
Blood pressure, hypertension, and the risk of aortic aneurysm in the UK Biobank
Blood pressure, hypertension, and the risk of aortic aneurysm in the UK Biobank
Abstract Background Although an association between elevated blood pressure and risk of aortic aneurysm is established, f...
Comparison of Heart Valve Circumference Examined Before and After 10% Formalin Fixation
Comparison of Heart Valve Circumference Examined Before and After 10% Formalin Fixation
Objective: To compare the heart valve circumference before and after 10% formalin fixation. Materials and Methods: The study analyzed 63 Thai human cadaveric hearts. Each heart val...

Back to Top