Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Critical ethnography: opportunities for social work research
View through CrossRef
Social work research is conducted using various approaches and methods. This article aims to characterize critical ethnography and its opportunities for critical social work aimed at overcoming structural inequalities.
Within the framework of the study, an analysis of 28 English-language full-text publications was carried out according to the following criteria: (1) the general purpose of critical ethnography as a research methodology in social work and its philosophy; (2) stages and procedures for using critical ethnography, the roles of researchers and other research participants; (3) cases of the use of critical ethnography in social work; (4) the advantages and limitations of critical ethnography.
Critical ethnography, like traditional ethnography, involves long-term observations of certain practices in the "field conditions." Observations can be supplemented by other methods that make it possible to assess the life experience of research participants from the perspective of the participants themselves.
Critical ethnography makes it possible to identify and describe structural inequality in society and to challenge existing practices, in particular, practices of providing social services. The main focus of research is the identification of hidden values and the use of power relations that reinforce the inequality of certain social groups and social injustice. Researchers are expected to have their own position and provide adequate theoretical justification for their actions, deep immersion in the context and social situation.
The use of critical ethnography involves a number of successive stages: the preparatory stage; the organizational and methodological stage; the field stage; the stage of research findings analysis; the presentation and dissemination of the results in order to promote social change.
Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University
Title: Critical ethnography: opportunities for social work research
Description:
Social work research is conducted using various approaches and methods.
This article aims to characterize critical ethnography and its opportunities for critical social work aimed at overcoming structural inequalities.
Within the framework of the study, an analysis of 28 English-language full-text publications was carried out according to the following criteria: (1) the general purpose of critical ethnography as a research methodology in social work and its philosophy; (2) stages and procedures for using critical ethnography, the roles of researchers and other research participants; (3) cases of the use of critical ethnography in social work; (4) the advantages and limitations of critical ethnography.
Critical ethnography, like traditional ethnography, involves long-term observations of certain practices in the "field conditions.
" Observations can be supplemented by other methods that make it possible to assess the life experience of research participants from the perspective of the participants themselves.
Critical ethnography makes it possible to identify and describe structural inequality in society and to challenge existing practices, in particular, practices of providing social services.
The main focus of research is the identification of hidden values and the use of power relations that reinforce the inequality of certain social groups and social injustice.
Researchers are expected to have their own position and provide adequate theoretical justification for their actions, deep immersion in the context and social situation.
The use of critical ethnography involves a number of successive stages: the preparatory stage; the organizational and methodological stage; the field stage; the stage of research findings analysis; the presentation and dissemination of the results in order to promote social change.
Related Results
Online ethnography: a study of software developers and software development
Online ethnography: a study of software developers and software development
Purpose– Qualitative research has made important contributions to social science by enabling researchers to engage with people and get an in-depth understanding of their views, bel...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
Rural Social Work in China
Rural Social Work in China
In this article, “China” refers to “mainland China.” Social work as academic discipline was first introduced to China’s most important universities, such as Yenching University, in...
Institutional ethnography
Institutional ethnography
The term “institutional ethnography” has been used since 1987 to refer to an approach to social inquiry pioneered by Canadian sociologist Dorothy E. Smith (Campbell & DeVault 2...
Transnational Perspectives in Social Work
Transnational Perspectives in Social Work
The transnational perspective contributes to the development of theoretical and practical knowledge of social work as this is conditioned and framed in contemporary dynamics of glo...
Christianity and Social Work
Christianity and Social Work
This bibliographic treatment of Christianity and social work is necessarily incomplete, reflecting the fragmented and somewhat contested nature of the topic itself. On one level, t...
Social Work Theory
Social Work Theory
Theory offers generalized, organized sets of ideas that describe and explain knowledge of the world. The boundary and compass of social work theory is contested, reflecting cultura...
Charting new territory for organizational ethnography
Charting new territory for organizational ethnography
Purpose– Increasing complexity, fragmentation, mobility, pace, and technological intermediation of organizational life make “being there” increasingly difficult. Where do ethnograp...

