Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Towards Resilient Critical Infrastructures: An Archetype-Based Approach to Climate Risk and Adaptation
View through CrossRef
Archetype-based classifications are a well-established method to categorize certain environments, systems or elements, according to the characteristics that differentiate them and make them unique. Typically, the final aim of archetype-based classifications is to facilitate the design of adaptation strategies.In the context of critical infrastructures (CI), archetype-based classifications are particularly valuable for assessing climate risks across different time horizons and climate change scenarios. This proposal presents a comprehensive methodological framework to use archetypes to identify and define adaptation options in the context of the climate risk framework of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).The proposed framework adopts a multidimensional approach to characterize climate risks archetypes, incorporating physical, economic, and social dimensions. Through an indicator-based methodology, it identifies analogous infrastructures—those with similar climate risk patterns—and groups them into archetypes. The final objectives of this methodological framework are: first, to identify analogous infrastructures (i.e., infrastructures that present a similar climate risk pattern and, therefore, that are classified in the same archetype) and; secondly, to design adaptation trajectories for the CI based on their classification for the different climate change scenarios, optimizing the adaptation planning and management in the short, mid and long-term.To illustrate the applicability of this methodology, the framework has been applied as a case study to European airports. Using the proposed approach to characterize the risk components —hazard, exposure and vulnerability—, airports have been classified into climate risk archetypes, identifying risk patterns across the physical, economic, and social dimensions. This case study exemplifies the utility of the framework for identifying analogous infrastructures and informing about effective adaptation options and pathways, helping in decision-making processes.Beyond its analytical contributions, the framework enhances risk communication by offering a comprehensive overview of climate risks and their potential impacts. This facilitates engagement with stakeholders, including infrastructure owners and operators, fostering coordinated efforts to adapt to climate risks and build CI resilience. The scalability and adaptability of the framework make it a valuable tool for managing climate risks in diverse infrastructure systems and regions.
Title: Towards Resilient Critical Infrastructures: An Archetype-Based Approach to Climate Risk and Adaptation
Description:
Archetype-based classifications are a well-established method to categorize certain environments, systems or elements, according to the characteristics that differentiate them and make them unique.
Typically, the final aim of archetype-based classifications is to facilitate the design of adaptation strategies.
In the context of critical infrastructures (CI), archetype-based classifications are particularly valuable for assessing climate risks across different time horizons and climate change scenarios.
This proposal presents a comprehensive methodological framework to use archetypes to identify and define adaptation options in the context of the climate risk framework of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
The proposed framework adopts a multidimensional approach to characterize climate risks archetypes, incorporating physical, economic, and social dimensions.
Through an indicator-based methodology, it identifies analogous infrastructures—those with similar climate risk patterns—and groups them into archetypes.
The final objectives of this methodological framework are: first, to identify analogous infrastructures (i.
e.
, infrastructures that present a similar climate risk pattern and, therefore, that are classified in the same archetype) and; secondly, to design adaptation trajectories for the CI based on their classification for the different climate change scenarios, optimizing the adaptation planning and management in the short, mid and long-term.
To illustrate the applicability of this methodology, the framework has been applied as a case study to European airports.
Using the proposed approach to characterize the risk components —hazard, exposure and vulnerability—, airports have been classified into climate risk archetypes, identifying risk patterns across the physical, economic, and social dimensions.
This case study exemplifies the utility of the framework for identifying analogous infrastructures and informing about effective adaptation options and pathways, helping in decision-making processes.
Beyond its analytical contributions, the framework enhances risk communication by offering a comprehensive overview of climate risks and their potential impacts.
This facilitates engagement with stakeholders, including infrastructure owners and operators, fostering coordinated efforts to adapt to climate risks and build CI resilience.
The scalability and adaptability of the framework make it a valuable tool for managing climate risks in diverse infrastructure systems and regions.
Related Results
“The Earth Is Dying, Bro”
“The Earth Is Dying, Bro”
Climate Change and Children
Australian children are uniquely situated in a vast landscape that varies drastically across locations. Spanning multiple climatic zones—from cool tempe...
Adaptive Planning for Resilient Coastal Waterfronts
Adaptive Planning for Resilient Coastal Waterfronts
Many delta and coastal cities worldwide face increasing flood risk due to changing climate conditions and sea level rise. The question is how to develop measures and strategies for...
Successful coastal adaptation projects? The role of multi-lateral climate funding.
Successful coastal adaptation projects? The role of multi-lateral climate funding.
<p><strong>This thesis investigates the evaluation of climate change adaptation success of projects in coastal zones of developing countries, specifically focusing on t...
Climate and Culture
Climate and Culture
Climate is, presently, a heatedly discussed topic. Concerns about the environmental, economic, political and social consequences of climate change are of central interest in academ...
Ethics of climate change : a normative account
Ethics of climate change : a normative account
Consider, for instance, you and your family have lived around a place where you enjoyed the flora and fauna of the land as well as the natural environment. Fishing and farming were...
Architecture and adaptation
Architecture and adaptation
«The architectural work transcends the architect, goes beyond the moment in which its construction takes place, and therefore can be contemplated under the changing lights of histo...
Validity and validation in archetype analysis: practical assessment framework and guidelines
Validity and validation in archetype analysis: practical assessment framework and guidelines
Abstract
Archetype analysis is a promising approach in sustainability science to identify patterns and explain mechanisms shaping the sustainability of social-ecolog...
A Synergistic Imperative: An Integrated Policy and Education Framework for Navigating the Climate Nexus
A Synergistic Imperative: An Integrated Policy and Education Framework for Navigating the Climate Nexus
Climate change acts as a systemic multiplier of threats, exacerbating interconnected global crises that jeopardize food security, biodiversity, and environmental health. These chal...

