Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Theory of structures and design codes
View through CrossRef
Building structures should correspond to the reliability requirements which are implemented with the help of design codes. The latter are based on the method of limit states. In order to simplify the verifications, the design codes often deliberately deviate from the scientifically based theoretical provisions of such fundamental disciplines as the theory of elasticity and the theory of plasticity, replacing them with the so-called working practices. The paper presents that there are inaccurately formulated recommendations in the design codes. The paper also specifies on some important problems that are not reflected in the design codes. This applies to the choice of failure probability values, the use of partial reliability factors, the calculation methodology in case of an emergency, the problems of using the results of nonlinear calculation, etc.
The paper presents some considerations on these issues, with the main attention being paid to the analysis of the existing design tradition and guidance to unresolved issues. The problems of recommended reliability parameters, clarification of the limit state concepts, analysis of accidental situations, the safety factors values and possible relationship between the safety factors for load and the safety factors for materials, loads and load effects, vulnerability assessment as well as reliability of protected systems have been considered.
The considerations presented by the paper give only a partial idea of the range of issues that arise when comparing working practices used in the design codes with the theoretical fundamentals they should correspond to. It should also be noted that the design codes do not provide any justifications for their recommendations. The presented paper can initiate a scientific discussion and be useful both for the developers of design codes and for the developers of software packages implemented the design codes.
Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture
Title: Theory of structures and design codes
Description:
Building structures should correspond to the reliability requirements which are implemented with the help of design codes.
The latter are based on the method of limit states.
In order to simplify the verifications, the design codes often deliberately deviate from the scientifically based theoretical provisions of such fundamental disciplines as the theory of elasticity and the theory of plasticity, replacing them with the so-called working practices.
The paper presents that there are inaccurately formulated recommendations in the design codes.
The paper also specifies on some important problems that are not reflected in the design codes.
This applies to the choice of failure probability values, the use of partial reliability factors, the calculation methodology in case of an emergency, the problems of using the results of nonlinear calculation, etc.
The paper presents some considerations on these issues, with the main attention being paid to the analysis of the existing design tradition and guidance to unresolved issues.
The problems of recommended reliability parameters, clarification of the limit state concepts, analysis of accidental situations, the safety factors values and possible relationship between the safety factors for load and the safety factors for materials, loads and load effects, vulnerability assessment as well as reliability of protected systems have been considered.
The considerations presented by the paper give only a partial idea of the range of issues that arise when comparing working practices used in the design codes with the theoretical fundamentals they should correspond to.
It should also be noted that the design codes do not provide any justifications for their recommendations.
The presented paper can initiate a scientific discussion and be useful both for the developers of design codes and for the developers of software packages implemented the design codes.
Related Results
Generalised array low‐density parity‐check codes
Generalised array low‐density parity‐check codes
In this study, using Group Permutation Low‐Density Parity‐Check (GP‐LDPC) codes, the authors generalise the concept of array Low‐Density Parity‐Check (LDPC) codes from fields of pr...
Quasi~λ-cyclic Codes Over a Class of Finite Commutative Semi-simple Rings
Quasi~λ-cyclic Codes Over a Class of Finite Commutative Semi-simple Rings
Abstract
In coding theory, quasi λ-cyclic codes form an important class of codes which have been extensively studied. In this paper, we investigate the algebraic structure ...
188-OR: Assessing the Validity of Diagnosis Codes for Gestational Diabetes Ascertainment
188-OR: Assessing the Validity of Diagnosis Codes for Gestational Diabetes Ascertainment
Background: Researchers often rely on diagnosis codes from billing/administrative data to ascertain diagnoses, including gestational diabetes (GDM). We assessed the validity of rel...
Livability of High-Rise Districts - Case Study of West Bay in Doha
Livability of High-Rise Districts - Case Study of West Bay in Doha
Doha, the capital of the state of Qatar, is a small Gulf city that grew as a port settlement on pearling and fishing activities. Since the mid-seventies, Doha has begun the process...
Use of Near-Real–Time Data to Inform Underage Drinking Surveillance in Nebraska
Use of Near-Real–Time Data to Inform Underage Drinking Surveillance in Nebraska
ObjectiveThe objective of this pilot study was to develop and evaluatesyndromic definitions for the monitoring of alcohol-related emergencydepartment (ED) visits in near-real–time ...
Twisted Hermitian Codes
Twisted Hermitian Codes
We define a family of codes called twisted Hermitian codes, which are based on Hermitian codes and inspired by the twisted Reed–Solomon codes described by Beelen, Puchinger, and Ni...
Game Theory in Business Ethics: Bad Ideology or Bad Press?
Game Theory in Business Ethics: Bad Ideology or Bad Press?
Solomon’s article and Binmore’s response exemplify a standard exchange between the game theorist and those critical of applying game theory to ethics. The critic of game theory lis...

