Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Empiricism and governance: Revisiting Hume's contributions to political philosophy and human nature
View through CrossRef
This study examines David Hume’s political philosophy, focusing on his empiricist approach to governance, human nature, and justice. It highlights how Hume’s ideas remain relevant to contemporary issues such as institutional trust, legitimacy, and governance challenges. A qualitative narrative literature review was conducted using primary sources (Hume’s A Treatise of Human Nature, Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary) and secondary literature. A thematic analysis identified key patterns in Hume’s political thought. Hume’s empiricism provides a pragmatic governance approach, emphasizing observation-based knowledge, skepticism of absolute authority, and adaptability. His conception of human nature, rooted in passions, customs, and social cooperation, offers insights into political legitimacy and social cohesion. His view of justice as a social construct remains applicable to modern governance and inequality debates. Hume’s empiricist framework supports evidence-based governance, emphasizing adaptive political institutions. His insights help address challenges in political legitimacy and public trust. This study underscores the relevance of Hume’s political philosophy in shaping contemporary governance, particularly in addressing institutional trust and justice.
Asian Economic and Social Society
Title: Empiricism and governance: Revisiting Hume's contributions to political philosophy and human nature
Description:
This study examines David Hume’s political philosophy, focusing on his empiricist approach to governance, human nature, and justice.
It highlights how Hume’s ideas remain relevant to contemporary issues such as institutional trust, legitimacy, and governance challenges.
A qualitative narrative literature review was conducted using primary sources (Hume’s A Treatise of Human Nature, Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary) and secondary literature.
A thematic analysis identified key patterns in Hume’s political thought.
Hume’s empiricism provides a pragmatic governance approach, emphasizing observation-based knowledge, skepticism of absolute authority, and adaptability.
His conception of human nature, rooted in passions, customs, and social cooperation, offers insights into political legitimacy and social cohesion.
His view of justice as a social construct remains applicable to modern governance and inequality debates.
Hume’s empiricist framework supports evidence-based governance, emphasizing adaptive political institutions.
His insights help address challenges in political legitimacy and public trust.
This study underscores the relevance of Hume’s political philosophy in shaping contemporary governance, particularly in addressing institutional trust and justice.
Related Results
What is Analytic Philosophy
What is Analytic Philosophy
Special Issue: What is Analytic PhilosophyReferencesHaaparantaG. P. Baker and P. M. S. Hacker. Frege: Logical Excavations. Oxford, Blackwell, 1984.M. Dummett. The Interpretation of...
Escaping the Shadow
Escaping the Shadow
Photo by Karl Raymund Catabas on Unsplash
The interests of patients at most levels of policymaking are represented by a disconnected patchwork of groups … “After Buddha was dead, ...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
Understanding Empiricism
Understanding Empiricism
Understanding Empiricism is an introduction to empiricism and the empiricist tradition in philosophy. The book examines the most important philosophical issues bearing on the subje...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
David Hume, Paternalist
David Hume, Paternalist
A standard worry about Hume’s account of justice is that it leaves those who are most vulnerable outside the circumstances of justice. An equally standard reply is that those who a...
Artificial Intelligence and Engineering: Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives in the New Era
Artificial Intelligence and Engineering: Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives in the New Era
In this work, a general definition, meaning, and importance of engineering are expressed generally, and the main branches of engineering are briefly discussed. The concept of techn...
Hume’s Critics: Kames and Reid
Hume’s Critics: Kames and Reid
Abstract
Hume’s view of justice was criticized by three other notable Scottish philosophers, all of whom nevertheless recognized his pre-eminence as a thinker. Lord ...

