Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Cross‐sectional study of propofol dose during intravenous sedation for dental surgery in patients with long‐term oral benzodiazepine therapy: A secondary publication

View through CrossRef
AbstractObjectivesThe amount of propofol required for intravenous sedation (IVS) in patients on long‐term oral benzodiazepine (BZD) therapy may be affected by drug interactions and central changes in sensitivity. However, there is no research on the effect of long‐term oral BZD use on the amount of propofol required for IVS. We aimed to clarify the difference between the total propofol dose required for IVS in patients with or without long‐term oral BZD therapy.Material and methodsAmong patients treated for 4 years, the total administered dose required for IVS with propofol alone and local anesthesia for the extraction of bilateral impacted mandibular wisdom teeth, was retrospectively compared between patients with continuous oral BZD use for ≥6 months (BZD group; n = 24) and those without such use (control group; n = 307). The aimed sedation level was the Ramsay sedation scale 3–4.ResultsThe amount of propofol required for IVS was significantly lower in the BZD group compared to the control group (4.83 ± 1.30 vs. 5.91 ± 1.25 mg/kg/h, p < .001; 95% confidence interval, −1.22 to −0.94 mg/kg/h; Cohen's d, 0.84). The required propofol dose was not influenced by preoperative oral BZD administration on the day of extraction (presence [n = 13] vs. absence [n = 11]: 4.9 ± 1.3 vs. 4.8 ± 1.7 mg/kg/h, p = .83). Long‐term oral BZD therapy remained a significant factor for a lower required propofol dose after adjusting for age with multiple linear regression analysis. The underlying mechanism cannot be an additive action process but might pertain to competitive inhibition via an enzyme involved in glucuronate conjugation or competitive albumin binding.ConclusionsClinicians should understand that patients on long‐term oral BZDs therapy might require less propofol for IVS than those not on BZDs, irrespective of whether BZDs were taken preoperatively on the day of surgery.
Title: Cross‐sectional study of propofol dose during intravenous sedation for dental surgery in patients with long‐term oral benzodiazepine therapy: A secondary publication
Description:
AbstractObjectivesThe amount of propofol required for intravenous sedation (IVS) in patients on long‐term oral benzodiazepine (BZD) therapy may be affected by drug interactions and central changes in sensitivity.
However, there is no research on the effect of long‐term oral BZD use on the amount of propofol required for IVS.
We aimed to clarify the difference between the total propofol dose required for IVS in patients with or without long‐term oral BZD therapy.
Material and methodsAmong patients treated for 4 years, the total administered dose required for IVS with propofol alone and local anesthesia for the extraction of bilateral impacted mandibular wisdom teeth, was retrospectively compared between patients with continuous oral BZD use for ≥6 months (BZD group; n = 24) and those without such use (control group; n = 307).
The aimed sedation level was the Ramsay sedation scale 3–4.
ResultsThe amount of propofol required for IVS was significantly lower in the BZD group compared to the control group (4.
83 ± 1.
30 vs.
5.
91 ± 1.
25 mg/kg/h, p < .
001; 95% confidence interval, −1.
22 to −0.
94 mg/kg/h; Cohen's d, 0.
84).
The required propofol dose was not influenced by preoperative oral BZD administration on the day of extraction (presence [n = 13] vs.
absence [n = 11]: 4.
9 ± 1.
3 vs.
4.
8 ± 1.
7 mg/kg/h, p = .
83).
Long‐term oral BZD therapy remained a significant factor for a lower required propofol dose after adjusting for age with multiple linear regression analysis.
The underlying mechanism cannot be an additive action process but might pertain to competitive inhibition via an enzyme involved in glucuronate conjugation or competitive albumin binding.
ConclusionsClinicians should understand that patients on long‐term oral BZDs therapy might require less propofol for IVS than those not on BZDs, irrespective of whether BZDs were taken preoperatively on the day of surgery.

Related Results

Awareness of Dental Personnel towards Occupational Injury- A Cross Sectional Study
Awareness of Dental Personnel towards Occupational Injury- A Cross Sectional Study
TITLE: Awareness of dental personnel towards occupational injury- a cross sectional study ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the awareness of dental personnel towards dental occup...
Safety of endoscopist-guided sedation in a low-risk collective
Safety of endoscopist-guided sedation in a low-risk collective
Abstract Introduction Worldwide, gastrointestinal endoscopies are predominantly performed under sedation. National and international guidelines and recommendations contai...
Guest Editorial
Guest Editorial
Dental caries is one of the major health problems in Indonesia. Data from Indonesian Basic Health Research in 2013, 2015 and 2018 showed a consistent increase in the prevalence of ...
Management of Oblique Root Fracture Using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A Case Report
Management of Oblique Root Fracture Using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A Case Report
Root fractures are relatively uncommon compared to other types of dental traumas. It is sometimes extremely difficult for practitioners to decide what should be done and which appr...
Additive Effects of Clonidine Used in Propofol Sedation in Colonoscopy
Additive Effects of Clonidine Used in Propofol Sedation in Colonoscopy
Background: Propofol is commonly used for sedation during colonoscopy but often requires high doses. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of propofol alone versus p...

Back to Top