Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Samuel Pufendorf and Religious Intolerance in the Early Enlightenment

View through CrossRef
This chapter examines the German jurist and philosopher Samuel Pufendorf as a theorist of religious intolerance. Usually, Pufendorf is associated with the defence of some degree of religious toleration. He was a strong critic of the revocation of the Edict of Nantes by Louis XIV, and it is often argued that Pufendorf intended to deconfessionalize politics by using his natural law theory to separate secular affairs of state from theological controversies over revealed religion. At the same time, however, Pufendorf has seemed a very inconsistent advocate of religious toleration, one who, on occasion, was willing to endorse religious intolerance. The chapter shows that Pufendorf's views are not as inconsistent as they might appear to be. He did not intend to deconfessionalize politics. He was not a principled defender of religious toleration. And the importance of his theory of natural law for his ideas on religious toleration is actually very limited.
Title: Samuel Pufendorf and Religious Intolerance in the Early Enlightenment
Description:
This chapter examines the German jurist and philosopher Samuel Pufendorf as a theorist of religious intolerance.
Usually, Pufendorf is associated with the defence of some degree of religious toleration.
He was a strong critic of the revocation of the Edict of Nantes by Louis XIV, and it is often argued that Pufendorf intended to deconfessionalize politics by using his natural law theory to separate secular affairs of state from theological controversies over revealed religion.
At the same time, however, Pufendorf has seemed a very inconsistent advocate of religious toleration, one who, on occasion, was willing to endorse religious intolerance.
The chapter shows that Pufendorf's views are not as inconsistent as they might appear to be.
He did not intend to deconfessionalize politics.
He was not a principled defender of religious toleration.
And the importance of his theory of natural law for his ideas on religious toleration is actually very limited.

Related Results

Differences in Distress Intolerance Among Daily and Intermittent Smokers
Differences in Distress Intolerance Among Daily and Intermittent Smokers
Abstract Introduction Distress intolerance is an important risk factor for smokers. Smokers have greater problems tolerating dis...
The Reception of Pufendorf’s ‘International Thought’ in Eighteenth-Century Germany
The Reception of Pufendorf’s ‘International Thought’ in Eighteenth-Century Germany
Abstract This chapter explores the reception of Pufendorf’s international thought in eighteenth-century German debates. First, it studies the reception and critique ...
Pufendorf on Confessional Strife and Interstate Relations
Pufendorf on Confessional Strife and Interstate Relations
Abstract The present chapter analyses Samuel Pufendorf’s understanding of the international legal order and how it was shaped by his reflections on topics that are c...
De Systematibus Civitatum
De Systematibus Civitatum
Abstract This chapter investigates Pufendorf’s concept of systema civitatum or ‘system of states’. The chapter illuminates the concept by excavating it in several co...
Pufendorf’s Enduring Legacy for International Law
Pufendorf’s Enduring Legacy for International Law
Abstract Pufendorf is often purported as an early modern exemplar of legal positivism. Law was conceptualized as command: it had to have an author (i.e. the ‘binding...
Die Hobbes’sche Gleichheit als Zusammenprall ,nicht existierender Rechte‘ nach der Kritik von Samuel Pufendorf
Die Hobbes’sche Gleichheit als Zusammenprall ,nicht existierender Rechte‘ nach der Kritik von Samuel Pufendorf
This contribution aims to analyse Samuel Pufendorf’s critique of the Hobbesian con- cept of equality as the equal exercise of natural rights.In the first section of this article, w...

Back to Top