Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Samuel Pufendorf and Religious Intolerance in the Early Enlightenment

View through CrossRef
This chapter examines the German jurist and philosopher Samuel Pufendorf as a theorist of religious intolerance. Usually, Pufendorf is associated with the defence of some degree of religious toleration. He was a strong critic of the revocation of the Edict of Nantes by Louis XIV, and it is often argued that Pufendorf intended to deconfessionalize politics by using his natural law theory to separate secular affairs of state from theological controversies over revealed religion. At the same time, however, Pufendorf has seemed a very inconsistent advocate of religious toleration, one who, on occasion, was willing to endorse religious intolerance. The chapter shows that Pufendorf's views are not as inconsistent as they might appear to be. He did not intend to deconfessionalize politics. He was not a principled defender of religious toleration. And the importance of his theory of natural law for his ideas on religious toleration is actually very limited.
Title: Samuel Pufendorf and Religious Intolerance in the Early Enlightenment
Description:
This chapter examines the German jurist and philosopher Samuel Pufendorf as a theorist of religious intolerance.
Usually, Pufendorf is associated with the defence of some degree of religious toleration.
He was a strong critic of the revocation of the Edict of Nantes by Louis XIV, and it is often argued that Pufendorf intended to deconfessionalize politics by using his natural law theory to separate secular affairs of state from theological controversies over revealed religion.
At the same time, however, Pufendorf has seemed a very inconsistent advocate of religious toleration, one who, on occasion, was willing to endorse religious intolerance.
The chapter shows that Pufendorf's views are not as inconsistent as they might appear to be.
He did not intend to deconfessionalize politics.
He was not a principled defender of religious toleration.
And the importance of his theory of natural law for his ideas on religious toleration is actually very limited.

Related Results

Die Hobbes’sche Gleichheit als Zusammenprall ,nicht existierender Rechte‘ nach der Kritik von Samuel Pufendorf
Die Hobbes’sche Gleichheit als Zusammenprall ,nicht existierender Rechte‘ nach der Kritik von Samuel Pufendorf
This contribution aims to analyse Samuel Pufendorf’s critique of the Hobbesian con- cept of equality as the equal exercise of natural rights.In the first section of this article, w...
The Political Writings of Samuel Pufendorf
The Political Writings of Samuel Pufendorf
Abstract The seventeenth-century philosopher Samuel Pufendorf was one of the most widely read natural lawyers of the pre-Kantian era. This volume presents the basic ...
The Pufendorf Lectures
The Pufendorf Lectures
This is an edition of two manuscripts with notes taken during Samuel Pufendorf's teaching at the University of Lund in the early 1670s. The shorter manuscript consists of annotatio...
Histamine Intolerance in Children: A Narrative Review
Histamine Intolerance in Children: A Narrative Review
Histamine intolerance is defined as a disequilibrium of accumulated histamine and the capacity for histamine degradation. This clinical term addresses a non-immunologically mediate...
Histamine Intolerance in Children
Histamine Intolerance in Children
Histamine intolerance is defined as disequilibrium of accumulated histamine and the capacity for histamine degradation. This clinical term addresses a non-immunologically mediated ...
Clinical characteristics and genetic predisposition of dyslipidemic patients with statin intolerance
Clinical characteristics and genetic predisposition of dyslipidemic patients with statin intolerance
Background: Statin therapy represents the gold standard in lipid lowering therapy, although it is associated with an increasing rate of therapeutic abandonment especially due to th...

Back to Top