Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Again on the 989 Voden Inscription of Tsar Samuel
View through CrossRef
The Voden inscription of Tsar Samuel from 989 was declared by Bozhidar Dimitrov (1997) a Revival forgery. For Ivan Dobrev (2007), it is an authentic monument, while according to Kazimir Popkonstantinov (2014), its text was created in the ruling quarters of Tarnovo’s tsars. Thanks to the need for an unusual title of Samuel (tsar of Bulgarians and Romans) in the inscription, its text dates back to the time of the correspondence between Tsar Kaloyan and Pope Innocent (in the second half of 1203). It can also be found on a portable marble tablet that was carved by a stonecutter in Bosnia or on the east coast of the Adriatic Sea. The dating is supported by the indisputable parallels of formulas and style established by Ivan Dobrev, but in a different chronological order – the Voden inscription “borrowed” from the Bitola inscription (1016) and “gave” to the Tarnovo inscription (1230). In Voden, it was formalized as the founding inscription of Tsar Samuel for the Assumption Church and was important for determining the leading role of the bishop of Maglen in the opposition of the Bulgarian bishops to the conquering policy of the Epirus emperor Theodore Comnenus at the 1217–1220 Council in Ohrid.
"St. Cyril and St. Methodius" University of Veliko Tarnovo
Title: Again on the 989 Voden Inscription of Tsar Samuel
Description:
The Voden inscription of Tsar Samuel from 989 was declared by Bozhidar Dimitrov (1997) a Revival forgery.
For Ivan Dobrev (2007), it is an authentic monument, while according to Kazimir Popkonstantinov (2014), its text was created in the ruling quarters of Tarnovo’s tsars.
Thanks to the need for an unusual title of Samuel (tsar of Bulgarians and Romans) in the inscription, its text dates back to the time of the correspondence between Tsar Kaloyan and Pope Innocent (in the second half of 1203).
It can also be found on a portable marble tablet that was carved by a stonecutter in Bosnia or on the east coast of the Adriatic Sea.
The dating is supported by the indisputable parallels of formulas and style established by Ivan Dobrev, but in a different chronological order – the Voden inscription “borrowed” from the Bitola inscription (1016) and “gave” to the Tarnovo inscription (1230).
In Voden, it was formalized as the founding inscription of Tsar Samuel for the Assumption Church and was important for determining the leading role of the bishop of Maglen in the opposition of the Bulgarian bishops to the conquering policy of the Epirus emperor Theodore Comnenus at the 1217–1220 Council in Ohrid.
Related Results
Tsar Mikhail Romanov: His Entry into Power
Tsar Mikhail Romanov: His Entry into Power
Introduction. As historical literature shows, the election of Tsar Mikhail Romanov at the Zemsky Sobor of 1613 occurred without broad support of boyars and nobles. The Cossacks pla...
Who Was Tsar Dmitrii?
Who Was Tsar Dmitrii?
In this article, Dunning challenges traditional scholarship concerning the identity and character of Tsar Dmitrii (reigned 1605-06), better known as the “False Dmitrii“—the only ts...
Two epigraphic-historical notes
Two epigraphic-historical notes
Recently a monograph appeared dealing with Roman epigraphical monuments from the West-Serbian town of Cacak and its neighbourhood (S. Ferjancic / G. Jeremic / A. Gojgic, Roman Epig...
Political Economy for Workers: A. N. Bakh’s Tsar-Golod
Political Economy for Workers: A. N. Bakh’s Tsar-Golod
“There’s a tsar in the world, a merciless tsar; / His name is—hunger!” These lines, taken from Nikolai A. Nekrasov’s poem “Zheleznaia doroga” (1864), serve as the epigraph for one ...
Campanian biostratigraphy and paleoenvironments, a case study from the Central Srednogorie Zone, Central Bulgaria
Campanian biostratigraphy and paleoenvironments, a case study from the Central Srednogorie Zone, Central Bulgaria
<p>The Central Srednogorie Zone of Bulgaria represents a chain of strike-slip and pull-apart basins, part of the of the peri-Tethyan arc/back-arc basin system. The Up...
Darius and the Bisotun Inscription: A New Interpretation of the Last Paragraph of Column IV
Darius and the Bisotun Inscription: A New Interpretation of the Last Paragraph of Column IV
AbstractThe last paragraph (lines 88-92) of Col. IV of the Old Persian version of the Bisotun inscription is one of the most difficult passages in this great inscription. In it, Da...
Roman Soldiers and Imperial Properties in the Galatian-Phrygian Borderland: A New Inscription from the Eskişehir Museum
Roman Soldiers and Imperial Properties in the Galatian-Phrygian Borderland: A New Inscription from the Eskişehir Museum
In this paper I introduce a new inscription from the Eskişehir Archaeological Museum which houses a numerous collection of inscribed material from the main civic centres such as Pe...
Freemasonry and the Occult at the Court of Peter the Great
Freemasonry and the Occult at the Court of Peter the Great
AbstractThe reign of Peter the Great is regarded as one of the most significant and contentious epochs in Russian history. It has been customary to view the reforms of the period a...

