Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Satire and the “Deathles Soule”
View through CrossRef
Chapter 2 concerns early interpretations of Donne’s satiric poetry, specifically Metempsychosis. Investigating a copy of Donne’s strange poem in Folger, Manuscript V.a. 241, this study proposes that the compiler purposefully grouped it with the other contents—satiric dialogues by Lucian and a fable entitled “The Tale of the Fauorite”—because of a thematic link: the dangers of untrustworthy advisors. Donne had just cause to fear criticizing the court candidly, especially thanks to his Catholic family heritage. Surrounded by spies and censors, in 1601 Donne resorted to poetic subterfuge. Analysis of paratexts and thematic connections suggests that a contemporary reader interpreted Metempsychosis as topical satire on manipulative court counselors, thus reinforcing the modern critical contention that the poem satirizes Sir Robert Cecil. This study also reveals a reader who, while compiling the manuscript in approximately 1620, might have perceived that such criticisms maintained relevance for George Villiers, Duke of Buckingham.
Title: Satire and the “Deathles Soule”
Description:
Chapter 2 concerns early interpretations of Donne’s satiric poetry, specifically Metempsychosis.
Investigating a copy of Donne’s strange poem in Folger, Manuscript V.
a.
241, this study proposes that the compiler purposefully grouped it with the other contents—satiric dialogues by Lucian and a fable entitled “The Tale of the Fauorite”—because of a thematic link: the dangers of untrustworthy advisors.
Donne had just cause to fear criticizing the court candidly, especially thanks to his Catholic family heritage.
Surrounded by spies and censors, in 1601 Donne resorted to poetic subterfuge.
Analysis of paratexts and thematic connections suggests that a contemporary reader interpreted Metempsychosis as topical satire on manipulative court counselors, thus reinforcing the modern critical contention that the poem satirizes Sir Robert Cecil.
This study also reveals a reader who, while compiling the manuscript in approximately 1620, might have perceived that such criticisms maintained relevance for George Villiers, Duke of Buckingham.
Related Results
Radical Satire And Print Culture 1790-1822
Radical Satire And Print Culture 1790-1822
Abstract
Radical Satire and Print Culture 1790-1822 focuses on the work produced collaboratively between 1816 and 1822 by the poet and radical journalist William ...
Humour in Iran
Humour in Iran
Satire, irony and humour have long been features of Persian literature’s rich tradition, taking various forms from the coarse and obscene to the subtle and refined.
Humou...
Political Mel Brooks
Political Mel Brooks
The Political Mel Brooks analyzes both Mel Brooks’s more popular films and his lesser known work to explore how his use of parody and satire, his keen sense of the history of Jewis...
Cleophilus’ De coetu poetarum and Iustus Lipsius’ Somnium
Cleophilus’ De coetu poetarum and Iustus Lipsius’ Somnium
Providing the first edited text, translation and commentary of two Renaissance dream-narrative satires, this edition sheds light on the period's literary history and reception of c...
Figuring Genre in Roman Satire
Figuring Genre in Roman Satire
Abstract
Satirists are social critics, but they are also products of society. Horace, Persius, and Juvenal, the verse satirists of ancient Rome, exploit this double ...
Subversive Ceramics
Subversive Ceramics
A Choice Outstanding Academic Title 2016
Satire has been used in ceramic production for centuries. Historically, it occurred as a slogan or proverb written into the ceram...

