Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Emergency Provisions: Article 356 of the Indian Constitution, its effect with special reference to Nagaland.

View through CrossRef
Emergency powers refers to an extraordinary circumstance because of which the state machinery is not able to be carried on accordance with ordinary constitutional setup. In such a circumstances, we adopt an altered constitutional setup where the normal functioning of the government and distribution of powers between Union Government and State Government undergo significant changes. Most of the times when emergency is declared, the individual’s rights are curtailed and most of the powers are vested on the union government. This is mainly done to give some extraordinary power to Government to take measures to come out of the crisis and to ensure integrity and stability of the nation. However, the concept of emergency in Indian Constitution has always been much contentious. Especially, state emergency under Article 356 which empowers the Union Government to exercise control over the state government when there is a breakdown of constitutional machinery has been widely criticized because of its tendency to be easily misused. While Article 356 was originally created to use it as last resort to restore constitutional order, it has historically been a source of political controversy, raising concerns about how it should be invoked, how long it should last, and how it affects federalism and democracy. This study aims to clarify the complex nature of Article 356’s emergency powers by examining its historical development, legal foundation, and political and constitutional implications. This paper tries to offer a fair and informative analysis of a provision that has important consequences for the Indian federal structure, democratic ideals, and the rule of law by looking at landmark cases, various recommendations by law commissions and actual instances of its invocation. This research article hopes to contribute to the ongoing discourse surrounding the applicability, effectiveness, and constraints of the Article 356 emergency powers in the changing context of Indian governance.
International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
Title: Emergency Provisions: Article 356 of the Indian Constitution, its effect with special reference to Nagaland.
Description:
Emergency powers refers to an extraordinary circumstance because of which the state machinery is not able to be carried on accordance with ordinary constitutional setup.
In such a circumstances, we adopt an altered constitutional setup where the normal functioning of the government and distribution of powers between Union Government and State Government undergo significant changes.
Most of the times when emergency is declared, the individual’s rights are curtailed and most of the powers are vested on the union government.
This is mainly done to give some extraordinary power to Government to take measures to come out of the crisis and to ensure integrity and stability of the nation.
However, the concept of emergency in Indian Constitution has always been much contentious.
Especially, state emergency under Article 356 which empowers the Union Government to exercise control over the state government when there is a breakdown of constitutional machinery has been widely criticized because of its tendency to be easily misused.
While Article 356 was originally created to use it as last resort to restore constitutional order, it has historically been a source of political controversy, raising concerns about how it should be invoked, how long it should last, and how it affects federalism and democracy.
This study aims to clarify the complex nature of Article 356’s emergency powers by examining its historical development, legal foundation, and political and constitutional implications.
This paper tries to offer a fair and informative analysis of a provision that has important consequences for the Indian federal structure, democratic ideals, and the rule of law by looking at landmark cases, various recommendations by law commissions and actual instances of its invocation.
This research article hopes to contribute to the ongoing discourse surrounding the applicability, effectiveness, and constraints of the Article 356 emergency powers in the changing context of Indian governance.

Related Results

Atypical business law provisions
Atypical business law provisions
The article is devoted to the vision of atypical business law provisions. It was found that the state of scientific opinion regarding atypical business law provisions is irrelevant...
Problems of Implementation of the Constitution of Ukraine: Analysis and Solutions
Problems of Implementation of the Constitution of Ukraine: Analysis and Solutions
The article analyses the main problems of the implementation of the Constitution of Ukraine and identifies the constitutional and legal means of their solution. As a methodologica...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
SHARIAH’S POSITION IN AFGHAN 2004 CONSTITUTION: A LEGAL ANALYSIS
SHARIAH’S POSITION IN AFGHAN 2004 CONSTITUTION: A LEGAL ANALYSIS
The legal position of Shariah in the 2004 Afghan constitution has been considerably debated due to the full involvement of the international community in the constitution-making pr...
Transforming Education through Technology: The Case of COVID 19 Digital Learning in Nagaland
Transforming Education through Technology: The Case of COVID 19 Digital Learning in Nagaland
Through the perspective of the COVID-19 pandemic and the disruption and opportunity it engendered, this chapter follows a transformative effect of EdTech and Digital education in I...
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com Abstract Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
„DOSTOJANSTVO“ USTAVA JUGOSLAVIJE IZ 1974. GODINE
„DOSTOJANSTVO“ USTAVA JUGOSLAVIJE IZ 1974. GODINE
Although the growth of constitutional matter is a general trend, the dignity of the constitution was grossly violated by the 1974 Constitution of the Socialist Federal Republic of ...
Indo-Anglian: Connotations and Denotations
Indo-Anglian: Connotations and Denotations
A different name than English literature, ‘Anglo-Indian Literature’, was given to the body of literature in English that emerged on account of the British interaction with India un...

Back to Top