Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Gurdjieff
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This is the first analysis of all of Gurdjieff’s published internal exercises, together with those taught by his students, George and Helen Adie. It includes a fresh biographical study of Gurdjieff, with groundbreaking observations on his relationships with P. D. Ouspensky and A. R. Orage (especially why he wanted to collaborate with them, and why that broke down). It shows that Gurdjieff was, fundamentally, a mystic and that his contemplation-like methods were probably drawn from Mount Athos and its hesychast tradition. It shows the continuity in Gurdjieff’s teaching, but also development and change. His original contribution to Western Esotericism lay in his use of tasks, disciplines, and contemplation-like exercises to bring his pupils to a sense of their own presence, which could, to some extent, be maintained in daily life in the social domain, and not only in the secluded conditions typical of meditation. It contends that he had initially intended not to use contemplation-like exercises, as he perceived dangers to be associated with these monastic methods, and the religious tradition to be in tension with the secular guise in which he first couched his teaching. As Gurdjieff adapted the teaching he had found in Eastern monasteries to Western urban and post-religious culture, he found it necessary to introduce contemplation. His development of the methods is demonstrated, and the importance of the three exercises in the Third Series, Life Is Real Only Then, When “I Am,” is shown, together with their almost certain borrowing from the exercises of the Philokalia.
Title: Gurdjieff
Description:
Abstract
This is the first analysis of all of Gurdjieff’s published internal exercises, together with those taught by his students, George and Helen Adie.
It includes a fresh biographical study of Gurdjieff, with groundbreaking observations on his relationships with P.
D.
Ouspensky and A.
R.
Orage (especially why he wanted to collaborate with them, and why that broke down).
It shows that Gurdjieff was, fundamentally, a mystic and that his contemplation-like methods were probably drawn from Mount Athos and its hesychast tradition.
It shows the continuity in Gurdjieff’s teaching, but also development and change.
His original contribution to Western Esotericism lay in his use of tasks, disciplines, and contemplation-like exercises to bring his pupils to a sense of their own presence, which could, to some extent, be maintained in daily life in the social domain, and not only in the secluded conditions typical of meditation.
It contends that he had initially intended not to use contemplation-like exercises, as he perceived dangers to be associated with these monastic methods, and the religious tradition to be in tension with the secular guise in which he first couched his teaching.
As Gurdjieff adapted the teaching he had found in Eastern monasteries to Western urban and post-religious culture, he found it necessary to introduce contemplation.
His development of the methods is demonstrated, and the importance of the three exercises in the Third Series, Life Is Real Only Then, When “I Am,” is shown, together with their almost certain borrowing from the exercises of the Philokalia.
Related Results
Self-remembering: Georges Ivanovitch Gurdjieff (1870-1949) & his legacy
Self-remembering: Georges Ivanovitch Gurdjieff (1870-1949) & his legacy
<p>The subject of this thesis is the spiritual practices taught by Gurdjieff (1870-1949) and the legacy of these teachings in the major spiritual groups that have aspired to ...
Batılı Bir Düşünür, Doğulu Bir Sufi: George Ivanovich Gurdjieff
Batılı Bir Düşünür, Doğulu Bir Sufi: George Ivanovich Gurdjieff
Araştırma, Avrupa’da düşünür ve Doğu ülkelerinde ise bir sufi olarak tanınan George Ivanovich Gurdjieff'in hayatını, felsefesini ve mistik öğretilerini incelemektedir. Gurdjieff'in...
Gurdjieff’s Last Exercises
Gurdjieff’s Last Exercises
Abstract
The chapter takes two exercises given by Gurdjieff to various people as their last exercise from him. The first, from Solange Claustres, is a discipline for...
Did Gurdjieff Write Scripture?
Did Gurdjieff Write Scripture?
Did Gurdjieff write scripture? Can we understand Gurdjieff’s writings in terms of a category he did not use? Conversely, can Gurdjieff’s ideas and practices be used to understand s...
Gurdjieff in the Late 1930s
Gurdjieff in the Late 1930s
Abstract
The more reliable and datable exercises for Gurdjieff’s activities in the 1930s is examined in this chapter: these comprise an “Exercise concerning Aim and ...
The Buddhist Trace in the Mysticism and Philosophy of G. I. Gurdjieff and P. D. Ouspensky
The Buddhist Trace in the Mysticism and Philosophy of G. I. Gurdjieff and P. D. Ouspensky
Introduction. This article analyzes the anthropological aspects of the teachings of the G. I. Gurdjieff and the Russian philosopher P. D. Ouspensky. Specifically, it examines the f...
Gurdjieff Theologos
Gurdjieff Theologos
G. I. Gurdjieff (1877[?]–1949) left a system of integrated ideas and practices which can provide promising fresh perspectives on stubborn theological conundrums, including teaching...
‘The Work’: The Teachings of G. I. Gurdjieff and P. D. Ouspensky in Russia and Beyond
‘The Work’: The Teachings of G. I. Gurdjieff and P. D. Ouspensky in Russia and Beyond
This chapter sets out the lives and careers of the independent teachers G. I. Gurdjieff (1866?–1949) and P. D. Ouspensky (1878–1947) in the context of their early careers within th...

