Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Cost and Outcome Analysis of Home Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

View through CrossRef
Background: Previous estimates of the cost of home parenteral and enteral nutrition (HPEN) have excluded hospitalization costs or were conducted abroad and have limited applicability in the United States. Few studies have used validated measures to determine the effect of home nutrition support on quality of life. Method: A cost and clinical outcome analysis was performed by retrospective review of charts of patients receiving HPEN from 1991 to 1996. Questionnaires to determine the influence of therapy on lifestyle (n = 41) and a general health status questionnaire, the short form 36‐item survey (n = 39), were mailed to patients. Results: The annual cost per patient for parenteral solutions was $55,193 ± 30,596 (mean ± SD) based on Medicare charges and for enteral tube feedings was $9605 ± 9327. The annual cost of hospitalization ranged from zero to $140,220 in the parenteral nutrition group and from zero to $39,204 in the enteral nutrition group. The annual number of hospitalizations per patient for patients receiving parenteral nutrition ranged from 0.52 to 1.10, compared with 0 to 0.50 in the enteral nutrition population. The health status of HPEN patients was significantly lower (p <.05) in five of the eight short‐form 36 health domains compared with the general population. The areas of lifestyle most frequently affected were travel, sleep, exercise and leisure. Conclusions: The majority of the cost of therapy was associated with the direct provision of nutrition, although in some patients the hospitalization expenditure exceeded this cost. Home nutrition support had a significant negative impact on a patient's quality of life and lifestyle. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 22:302–310, 1998)
Title: Cost and Outcome Analysis of Home Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Description:
Background: Previous estimates of the cost of home parenteral and enteral nutrition (HPEN) have excluded hospitalization costs or were conducted abroad and have limited applicability in the United States.
Few studies have used validated measures to determine the effect of home nutrition support on quality of life.
Method: A cost and clinical outcome analysis was performed by retrospective review of charts of patients receiving HPEN from 1991 to 1996.
Questionnaires to determine the influence of therapy on lifestyle (n = 41) and a general health status questionnaire, the short form 36‐item survey (n = 39), were mailed to patients.
Results: The annual cost per patient for parenteral solutions was $55,193 ± 30,596 (mean ± SD) based on Medicare charges and for enteral tube feedings was $9605 ± 9327.
The annual cost of hospitalization ranged from zero to $140,220 in the parenteral nutrition group and from zero to $39,204 in the enteral nutrition group.
The annual number of hospitalizations per patient for patients receiving parenteral nutrition ranged from 0.
52 to 1.
10, compared with 0 to 0.
50 in the enteral nutrition population.
The health status of HPEN patients was significantly lower (p <.
05) in five of the eight short‐form 36 health domains compared with the general population.
The areas of lifestyle most frequently affected were travel, sleep, exercise and leisure.
Conclusions: The majority of the cost of therapy was associated with the direct provision of nutrition, although in some patients the hospitalization expenditure exceeded this cost.
Home nutrition support had a significant negative impact on a patient's quality of life and lifestyle.
(Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 22:302–310, 1998).

Related Results

Grains or Veins: Is Enteral Nutrition Really Better Than Parenteral Nutrition? A Look at the Evidence
Grains or Veins: Is Enteral Nutrition Really Better Than Parenteral Nutrition? A Look at the Evidence
Background: Enteral nutrition is said to be better than parenteral nutrition for providing nutrition support to humans. Purpose: To assess the literature documenting the assertions...
FORMULASI FORMULA ENTERAL BLENDERIZED NON MILK BASED
FORMULASI FORMULA ENTERAL BLENDERIZED NON MILK BASED
ABSTRACTBackground: Hospital enteral formula with lactose-free content is still rare, meanwhile lactose-free enteral food is needed, especially with patients who have lactose intol...
Parenteral Versus Enteral Nutrition on Perioperative Cognitive Function in Anesthesia Patients
Parenteral Versus Enteral Nutrition on Perioperative Cognitive Function in Anesthesia Patients
This study evaluated the impact of enteral nutrition versus parenteral nutrition on perioperative cognitive function and related outcomes in patients undergoing different surgeries...
American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Presidential Address: Food for Thought: It's More Than Nutrition
American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Presidential Address: Food for Thought: It's More Than Nutrition
Three issues were highlighted in the 30th Presidential Address to the society: (1) A.S.P.E.N.'s unique interdisciplinary structure; (2) support of the A.S.P.E.N. Rhoads Research Fo...
Electronic Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Electronic Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Background: With reports of deleterious effects of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in adults in addition to our surveys, which indicated that ¼, and as many as 1/2, of US academic...
Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition
Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition
Alternative routes of nutrient administration are available for patients who are unable to eat or digest sufficient food to prevent malnutrition. These routes include enteral (admi...
Nutritional Support after Open Liver Resection: A Systematic Review
Nutritional Support after Open Liver Resection: A Systematic Review
<i>Background:</i> Perioperative nutrition in patients with limited liver function after partial hepatic resection is still controversial. In particular, the significan...

Back to Top