Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A system approach for waterhemp ( Amaranthus tuberculatus ) management in soybean–sugar beet rotation
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Effective waterhemp management in crop rotations that include sugar beet requires a proactive approach, starting with robust weed management in the preceding crop. Sugar beet is vulnerable to weeds due to its poor competitiveness during its early growth stages and a limited availability of effective herbicide options within this rotation. This research aimed to evaluate multi-tactic weed management strategies, including planting soybean in narrow rows with low- and high-input treatments, and a high-input treatment plus harvest-time weed seed control (HWSC) simulation, on waterhemp control and seed production in soybean, and their effects on waterhemp density in the following sugar beet crop. Field experiments were conducted from 2021 to 2023 in Franklin, Moorhead, and Rosemount, Minnesota. Soybean planted in narrow rows closed the canopy earlier at Franklin in 2021 and at Moorhead in 2022. Soybean row spacing did not affect waterhemp control, density, biomass, or seed production at any site-year. A high-input treatment consisting of flumioxazin applied preemergence followed by (fb) an early postemergence application of lactofen + acetochlor fb a late-postemergence application of 2,4-D + glyphosate provided ≥95% waterhemp control at harvest at all site-years and seed production was reduced to 0 seeds m
−2
at Franklin and Rosemount. At those locations, waterhemp control at harvest was comparable among all high-input herbicide treatments. Soybean planted in narrow rows yielded 9.4% and 18.5% more than soybean planted in wide rows at Franklin and Rosemount, respectively, while no yield difference was observed at Moorhead. Waterhemp emergence in the subsequent season’s sugar beet crop fell by 72% to 92% at the Franklin site in 2022, Moorhead in 2023, and Rosemount in 2023 after high-input herbicide treatments. However, adding HWSC to a high-input treatment did not result in a further reduction of waterhemp density. In this research, 1 yr of effective waterhemp control with high-input herbicide treatments in soybean reduced waterhemp emergence in the following season’s sugar beet crop.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: A system approach for waterhemp (
Amaranthus tuberculatus
) management in soybean–sugar beet rotation
Description:
Abstract
Effective waterhemp management in crop rotations that include sugar beet requires a proactive approach, starting with robust weed management in the preceding crop.
Sugar beet is vulnerable to weeds due to its poor competitiveness during its early growth stages and a limited availability of effective herbicide options within this rotation.
This research aimed to evaluate multi-tactic weed management strategies, including planting soybean in narrow rows with low- and high-input treatments, and a high-input treatment plus harvest-time weed seed control (HWSC) simulation, on waterhemp control and seed production in soybean, and their effects on waterhemp density in the following sugar beet crop.
Field experiments were conducted from 2021 to 2023 in Franklin, Moorhead, and Rosemount, Minnesota.
Soybean planted in narrow rows closed the canopy earlier at Franklin in 2021 and at Moorhead in 2022.
Soybean row spacing did not affect waterhemp control, density, biomass, or seed production at any site-year.
A high-input treatment consisting of flumioxazin applied preemergence followed by (fb) an early postemergence application of lactofen + acetochlor fb a late-postemergence application of 2,4-D + glyphosate provided ≥95% waterhemp control at harvest at all site-years and seed production was reduced to 0 seeds m
−2
at Franklin and Rosemount.
At those locations, waterhemp control at harvest was comparable among all high-input herbicide treatments.
Soybean planted in narrow rows yielded 9.
4% and 18.
5% more than soybean planted in wide rows at Franklin and Rosemount, respectively, while no yield difference was observed at Moorhead.
Waterhemp emergence in the subsequent season’s sugar beet crop fell by 72% to 92% at the Franklin site in 2022, Moorhead in 2023, and Rosemount in 2023 after high-input herbicide treatments.
However, adding HWSC to a high-input treatment did not result in a further reduction of waterhemp density.
In this research, 1 yr of effective waterhemp control with high-input herbicide treatments in soybean reduced waterhemp emergence in the following season’s sugar beet crop.
Related Results
Microrna Regulation of Nodule Zone-Specific Gene Expression In Soybean
Microrna Regulation of Nodule Zone-Specific Gene Expression In Soybean
Nitrogen is a paramount important essential element for all living organisms. It has been found to bea crucial structural component of proteins, nucleic acids, enzymes and other ce...
A New Method for Calculating Sugars Content and Determining Appropriate Sugars Levels in Foods
A New Method for Calculating Sugars Content and Determining Appropriate Sugars Levels in Foods
Calculating the sugars content per 100 g or 100 mL or the reference amount customarily consumed (RACC) of food shows the sugars content of some foods inappropriately. So, making so...
Row Orientation and Planting Pattern of Relay Intercropped Soybean and Wheat
Row Orientation and Planting Pattern of Relay Intercropped Soybean and Wheat
Relay intercropping soybean [Glycine max(L.) Merr.] into winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) may increase soybean yields compared with doublecropping. Once the soybean crop is esta...
Biological protection of sugar beet sowings from beet nematode
Biological protection of sugar beet sowings from beet nematode
Goal. To identify the efficiency of the bionematicide Clariva 156, FS (spores of the bacterium Pasteuria nishizawae, strain Pn 1, 0.02 l/seed unit) against beet nematode in sugar b...
Evaluating long-term and alternative control strategies for waterhemp (amaranthus tuberculatus) management
Evaluating long-term and alternative control strategies for waterhemp (amaranthus tuberculatus) management
Waterhemp is a difficult to control weed in the Midwestern United States due to its prevalence in many cropping systems, its high fecundity, rapid growth rate, and evolution of her...
Physico-chemical Characterization of Granulated Sugar from Coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) Inflorescence Sap Cultivars and Sugar Cane in Côte d'Ivoire
Physico-chemical Characterization of Granulated Sugar from Coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) Inflorescence Sap Cultivars and Sugar Cane in Côte d'Ivoire
Aims: To evaluate and compare some physico-chemical characteristics of powdered sugar from the inflorescences of three of the most widespread coconut cultivars in Côte d'Ivoire com...
Investigation of resistance against Ditylenchus dipsaci on sugar beet
Investigation of resistance against Ditylenchus dipsaci on sugar beet
The stem and bulb nematode Ditylenchus dipsaci (Kuhn 1857) Filipjev 1936 is a migratory endoparasite ranked in the top ten plant-parasitic nematodes worldwide. Ditylenchus dipsaci ...
Distribution of some aphid-borne viruses infecting sugar beet in Turkey
Distribution of some aphid-borne viruses infecting sugar beet in Turkey
Surveys were conducted in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) growing areas, which cover 52% of Turkey’s sugar beet production. Sugar beet leaves showing virus-like symptoms such as chlo...

