Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of hemodynamic change following spinal anesthesia in preeclamptic and non-preeclamptic parturients undergoing cesarean section at University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Spinal anesthesia-induced maternal hypotension is the most frequent complication associated with maternal morbidity and mortality during cesarean section. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence and magnitude of hemodynamic changes in preeclamptic and non-preeclamptic parturients undergone cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Method A prospective cohort study was conducted from February to May 2019 in University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital. A total of 122 ASA II and ASA III parturients were recruited consecutively and assigned to two groups (81non-preeclamptics, and 41 preeclamptics). The data analysis was done by SPSS version 22 statistical software. The data were tested for normality with Shapiro Wilk U-test and normally distributed data were compared by using the independent student’s t-test. Whereas non-normally distributed data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U- test. Fisher’s exact test was used for intergroup comparison of proportion. All P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Result The incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension was higher in non-preeclamptic parturients than preeclamptic parturients (55.6% vs. 34.1%, respectively) and the degree of blood pressure drop was significantly greater in the non-preeclamptic parturients compared to those with preeclampsia; As well intraoperative fluid consumption was significantly greater in the non-preeclamptics parturients compared to those with preeclamptics. Conclusion The incidence and magnitude of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in parturients undergone cesarean section were less in preeclamptic parturients than in non-preeclamptic parturients. Therefore, don’t deny spinal anesthesia for preeclamptic parturients due to fear of profound hypotension, unless there is a contraindication for spinal anesthesia.
Title: Comparison of hemodynamic change following spinal anesthesia in preeclamptic and non-preeclamptic parturients undergoing cesarean section at University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.
Description:
Abstract Background Spinal anesthesia-induced maternal hypotension is the most frequent complication associated with maternal morbidity and mortality during cesarean section.
The aim of this study was to compare the incidence and magnitude of hemodynamic changes in preeclamptic and non-preeclamptic parturients undergone cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
Method A prospective cohort study was conducted from February to May 2019 in University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital.
A total of 122 ASA II and ASA III parturients were recruited consecutively and assigned to two groups (81non-preeclamptics, and 41 preeclamptics).
The data analysis was done by SPSS version 22 statistical software.
The data were tested for normality with Shapiro Wilk U-test and normally distributed data were compared by using the independent student’s t-test.
Whereas non-normally distributed data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U- test.
Fisher’s exact test was used for intergroup comparison of proportion.
All P values <0.
05 were considered statistically significant.
Result The incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension was higher in non-preeclamptic parturients than preeclamptic parturients (55.
6% vs.
34.
1%, respectively) and the degree of blood pressure drop was significantly greater in the non-preeclamptic parturients compared to those with preeclampsia; As well intraoperative fluid consumption was significantly greater in the non-preeclamptics parturients compared to those with preeclamptics.
Conclusion The incidence and magnitude of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in parturients undergone cesarean section were less in preeclamptic parturients than in non-preeclamptic parturients.
Therefore, don’t deny spinal anesthesia for preeclamptic parturients due to fear of profound hypotension, unless there is a contraindication for spinal anesthesia.

Related Results

Comparative Study of Inguinal Hernia Repair under Local Anesthesia versus Spinal Anesthesia in Reducing Hospital Stay of Patient
Comparative Study of Inguinal Hernia Repair under Local Anesthesia versus Spinal Anesthesia in Reducing Hospital Stay of Patient
Background: Inguinal hernia is a very common problem in men. Mostly end in hernia repair. As inguinal hernia present in lower abdomen, below umbilicus, repair can be done under spi...
Spinal induced hypotension in pre-eclamptic and healthy parturients
Spinal induced hypotension in pre-eclamptic and healthy parturients
Background: Preeclampsia/eclampsia is the third leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and severity of spinal-induced hypoten...

Back to Top