Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Product Carbon Footprint of EU beet sugar (Part II)

View through CrossRef
With regard to farming operations, all N-fertilizer was assumed to be in the form of mineral fertilizer, as there is no publicly available figure known for the average use of organic fertilizer (e.g. manure) in sugar beet cultivation in Europe. All the basic inputs to sugar beet cultivation were included, that is, seed, fertilisers, pesticides and diesel consumption for field work. Nitrous oxide, soil emissions (N2O, commonly known as laughing gas) from farming were included according to Biograce (i.e. 2.7% of applied N is emitted as N2O). Transport of sugar beet and adherent soil was also accounted for, and it was assumed that all transports are by 40-t truck. The emissions related to the return of empty trucks delivering beet to the factories were also accounted for in the Biograce data. GHG emissions linked to LUC (land use change, direct or indirect) were estimated to be negligible because all land used to grow beet, at least in the EU, is already arable land. With regard to factories, very small inputs were excluded. Specifically, most process chemicals used in sugar production such as NaOH or HCl for pH correction or antifoaming agents were assumed not to be significant for the overall result because they were used only in small quantities. However, as limestone is a processing aid used in larger amounts (approx. 2% per tonne of beet processed), it therefore was included.7 For surplus steam, which some factories co-produce, substitutes were difficult to establish, because they depend on the local situation. Since the resulting GHG credit for surplus steam was expected to be small as an EU average, no GHG credit for surplus steam was calculated. Potential emissions from water treatment systems were, on the other hand, not taken into account because there is insufficient data available about the different types of water treatment systems in operation in EU beet sugar factories. The emission factors of the process inputs used in the calculations are listed in Table 9.
Title: The Product Carbon Footprint of EU beet sugar (Part II)
Description:
With regard to farming operations, all N-fertilizer was assumed to be in the form of mineral fertilizer, as there is no publicly available figure known for the average use of organic fertilizer (e.
g.
manure) in sugar beet cultivation in Europe.
All the basic inputs to sugar beet cultivation were included, that is, seed, fertilisers, pesticides and diesel consumption for field work.
Nitrous oxide, soil emissions (N2O, commonly known as laughing gas) from farming were included according to Biograce (i.
e.
2.
7% of applied N is emitted as N2O).
Transport of sugar beet and adherent soil was also accounted for, and it was assumed that all transports are by 40-t truck.
The emissions related to the return of empty trucks delivering beet to the factories were also accounted for in the Biograce data.
GHG emissions linked to LUC (land use change, direct or indirect) were estimated to be negligible because all land used to grow beet, at least in the EU, is already arable land.
With regard to factories, very small inputs were excluded.
Specifically, most process chemicals used in sugar production such as NaOH or HCl for pH correction or antifoaming agents were assumed not to be significant for the overall result because they were used only in small quantities.
However, as limestone is a processing aid used in larger amounts (approx.
2% per tonne of beet processed), it therefore was included.
7 For surplus steam, which some factories co-produce, substitutes were difficult to establish, because they depend on the local situation.
Since the resulting GHG credit for surplus steam was expected to be small as an EU average, no GHG credit for surplus steam was calculated.
Potential emissions from water treatment systems were, on the other hand, not taken into account because there is insufficient data available about the different types of water treatment systems in operation in EU beet sugar factories.
The emission factors of the process inputs used in the calculations are listed in Table 9.

Related Results

Biological protection of sugar beet sowings from beet nematode
Biological protection of sugar beet sowings from beet nematode
Goal. To identify the efficiency of the bionematicide Clariva 156, FS (spores of the bacterium Pasteuria nishizawae, strain Pn 1, 0.02 l/seed unit) against beet nematode in sugar b...
Distribution of some aphid-borne viruses infecting sugar beet in Turkey
Distribution of some aphid-borne viruses infecting sugar beet in Turkey
Surveys were conducted in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) growing areas, which cover 52% of Turkey’s sugar beet production. Sugar beet leaves showing virus-like symptoms such as chlo...
Sugar-sweetened beverages and household sugar consumption patterns among adults living in Southgate, Phoenix
Sugar-sweetened beverages and household sugar consumption patterns among adults living in Southgate, Phoenix
Background: The Health Promotion Levy (HPL) was implemented in South Africa in 2018 as an intervention to decrease sugar consumption. While the link between excessive sugar consump...
An Empirical Study of the Impact of Urbanization on Industry Water Footprint in China
An Empirical Study of the Impact of Urbanization on Industry Water Footprint in China
How to advance new urbanization initiatives and reduce the water footprint of industries is one urgent issue about urbanization that needs to be resolved. Based on spatial dynamic ...
OPTIMIZATION OF PARAMETERS OF WORKING BODIES OF MACHINES FOR SUGAR BEET PRODUCTION
OPTIMIZATION OF PARAMETERS OF WORKING BODIES OF MACHINES FOR SUGAR BEET PRODUCTION
Existing technologies and modern technical means do not always provide the required quality of technological processes for growing sugar beets. Increasing requirements necessitate ...
The Sugar Beet Production Forecast in the Republic of Moldova
The Sugar Beet Production Forecast in the Republic of Moldova
Abstract The production of the sugar beet in the Republic of Moldova (RM) in the last ten years decreased considerably. The world and Moldovan sugar consumption is increasing, ther...
The Possible Impact of Different Pack Sizes of Carbonated Soft Drinks on Sugar Intake in Nigeria
The Possible Impact of Different Pack Sizes of Carbonated Soft Drinks on Sugar Intake in Nigeria
Background : According to WHO, in 2022, 16% of adults and 8% of children and adolescents globally were living with obesity. In Nigeria, the adult obesity prevalence was around 15%....
Introducing a new national tool to monitor the carbon footprint of inhalers
Introducing a new national tool to monitor the carbon footprint of inhalers
Abstract Introduction The Welsh Government launched its National Health Service (NHS) Wales decarbonisation strategic delivery p...

Back to Top