Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Beyond CPRA: Identifying Sensitized Kidney Candidates with Markedly Low Access to Deceased Donor Transplantation by Granular CPRA and Blood Type

View through CrossRef
Prioritization in the US Kidney Allocation System (KAS) has led to an improvement in the rates of transplantation in highly sensitized (HS) patients. However, there is a subset of HS patients who are at a disadvantage, despite prioritization under KAS. The purpose of this study was to describe the transplant rate (TR) by calculated panel reactive antibody (CPRA) of HS candidates before and five years post-KAS to characterize their access to deceased donor transplants and quantify the number of HS candidates who are at a marked disadvantage in accessing kidneys. Using de-identified OPTN data, the number of solitary deceased donor kidney transplants performed (by month) from June 2013 through December 2019 was analyzed for four CPRA groups (95–97%, 98%, 99%, and 100%), with the CPRA 100% group further stratified into two subgroups (99.5–99.9% and >99.9%). The impact of the recipient blood group was assessed as an additional factor in TR. Immediately after KAS, TR rose 7-fold from 0.26% to 1.7% for the CPRA 99–100% group as a whole, and 12-fold and 8-fold for the CPRA 99.5–99.9% and CPRA 99.9%+ groups, respectively. However, the post-KAS mean TR of 0.63% for CPRA 99.9%+ candidates remained markedly lower than the mean TR of the other sensitized groups: 1.5% for CPRA 95–97%, 1.4% for CPRA 98%, 2.0% for CPRA 99%, and 3.5% for CPRA 99.5–99.9%; a statistically significant 6-fold advantage of the CPRA 99.5–99.9% group over CPRA 99.9%+ candidates was observed, despite both groups receiving national priority under KAS. Patients with a CPRA of 99.9%+ and blood group B were 2.16, 1.98, and 1.75 times less likely to receive a transplant compared to the same CPRA group with blood groups A, AB, and O, respectively, despite changes to KAS allocating blood type A2 and A2B to recipients with blood group B. Although the TR increased sharply for the CPRA 99.9%+ group with KAS, it remained markedly lower than the average despite national priority.
Title: Beyond CPRA: Identifying Sensitized Kidney Candidates with Markedly Low Access to Deceased Donor Transplantation by Granular CPRA and Blood Type
Description:
Prioritization in the US Kidney Allocation System (KAS) has led to an improvement in the rates of transplantation in highly sensitized (HS) patients.
However, there is a subset of HS patients who are at a disadvantage, despite prioritization under KAS.
The purpose of this study was to describe the transplant rate (TR) by calculated panel reactive antibody (CPRA) of HS candidates before and five years post-KAS to characterize their access to deceased donor transplants and quantify the number of HS candidates who are at a marked disadvantage in accessing kidneys.
Using de-identified OPTN data, the number of solitary deceased donor kidney transplants performed (by month) from June 2013 through December 2019 was analyzed for four CPRA groups (95–97%, 98%, 99%, and 100%), with the CPRA 100% group further stratified into two subgroups (99.
5–99.
9% and >99.
9%).
The impact of the recipient blood group was assessed as an additional factor in TR.
Immediately after KAS, TR rose 7-fold from 0.
26% to 1.
7% for the CPRA 99–100% group as a whole, and 12-fold and 8-fold for the CPRA 99.
5–99.
9% and CPRA 99.
9%+ groups, respectively.
However, the post-KAS mean TR of 0.
63% for CPRA 99.
9%+ candidates remained markedly lower than the mean TR of the other sensitized groups: 1.
5% for CPRA 95–97%, 1.
4% for CPRA 98%, 2.
0% for CPRA 99%, and 3.
5% for CPRA 99.
5–99.
9%; a statistically significant 6-fold advantage of the CPRA 99.
5–99.
9% group over CPRA 99.
9%+ candidates was observed, despite both groups receiving national priority under KAS.
Patients with a CPRA of 99.
9%+ and blood group B were 2.
16, 1.
98, and 1.
75 times less likely to receive a transplant compared to the same CPRA group with blood groups A, AB, and O, respectively, despite changes to KAS allocating blood type A2 and A2B to recipients with blood group B.
Although the TR increased sharply for the CPRA 99.
9%+ group with KAS, it remained markedly lower than the average despite national priority.

Related Results

[RETRACTED] Guardian Blood Balance –Feel the difference Guardian Blood Balance makes! v1
[RETRACTED] Guardian Blood Balance –Feel the difference Guardian Blood Balance makes! v1
[RETRACTED]Guardian Blood Balance Reviews (Works Or Hoax) Does Guardian Botanicals Blood Balance AU Really Works? Read Updated Report! Diabetes and Hypertension is such a health p...
Finding people like me: contact among young adults who share an open-identity sperm donor
Finding people like me: contact among young adults who share an open-identity sperm donor
Abstract STUDY QUESTION What interests and experiences do donor-conceived adults have with respect to same-donor peers/siblings,...
MO927IMPACT OF DONOR AGE ON LIVING DONOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
MO927IMPACT OF DONOR AGE ON LIVING DONOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
Abstract Background and Aims Although elderly living donors are recognized as a marginal donor for kidney transplantation, the n...
Deceased Donor Characteristics and Kidney Transplant Outcomes
Deceased Donor Characteristics and Kidney Transplant Outcomes
Kidney transplantation is the therapy of choice for people living with kidney failure who are suitable for surgery. However, the disparity between supply versus demand for organs m...
Live donor liver transplantation
Live donor liver transplantation
With ever-increasing demand for liver replacement, supply of organs is the limiting factor and a significant number of patients die while waiting. Live donor liver transplantation ...
Blood Cross Matching Without Anti-Human Globulin (AHG) and Bovine Serum: A New Interest for an Old Idea
Blood Cross Matching Without Anti-Human Globulin (AHG) and Bovine Serum: A New Interest for an Old Idea
Abstract  Introduction Transfusion medicine promotes the safety of blood transfusions by rigorously testing to eliminate risks of infection and hemolytic. The efficacy (to correct ...
Survival Advantage Comparing Older Living Donor Versus Standard Criteria Donor Kidney Transplants
Survival Advantage Comparing Older Living Donor Versus Standard Criteria Donor Kidney Transplants
The aim of this analysis was to explore mortality outcomes for kidney transplant candidates receiving older living donor kidneys (age ≥60 years) versus younger deceased donors or r...

Back to Top