Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Perspectival Anaphora
View through CrossRef
Abstract
A perspectival anaphor reflects the mental or spatial perspective of its antecedent and is often categorized as a ‘long-distance anaphor’ or ‘logophor’. This chapter presents an overview of perspectival anaphora in Dravidian, using the Tamil anaphor ta(a)n as a case study. Perspectival anaphora has been claimed in the literature to be a structurally recalcitrant phenomenon since the antecedent of a perspectival anaphor is typically non-local to it and need not c-command it. However, we will see evidence from Tamil ta(a)n in this chapter showing that this is just an illusion: anti-locality effects and evidence from verbal agreement and dialectal microvariation show that ta(a)n must be bound locally by a minimally c-commanding binder, in accordance with Binding Condition A. Based on these findings, I propose a two-stage model of perspectival anaphora, which systematically combines pronominal coreference within the discourse context with anaphoric binding in syntax and semantics.
Title: Perspectival Anaphora
Description:
Abstract
A perspectival anaphor reflects the mental or spatial perspective of its antecedent and is often categorized as a ‘long-distance anaphor’ or ‘logophor’.
This chapter presents an overview of perspectival anaphora in Dravidian, using the Tamil anaphor ta(a)n as a case study.
Perspectival anaphora has been claimed in the literature to be a structurally recalcitrant phenomenon since the antecedent of a perspectival anaphor is typically non-local to it and need not c-command it.
However, we will see evidence from Tamil ta(a)n in this chapter showing that this is just an illusion: anti-locality effects and evidence from verbal agreement and dialectal microvariation show that ta(a)n must be bound locally by a minimally c-commanding binder, in accordance with Binding Condition A.
Based on these findings, I propose a two-stage model of perspectival anaphora, which systematically combines pronominal coreference within the discourse context with anaphoric binding in syntax and semantics.
Related Results
Anaphora Resolution
Anaphora Resolution
This chapter provides a theoretical background of anaphora and introduces the varieties of this pervasive linguistic phenomenon. Next, it defines the task of anaphora resolution an...
Interperspectival Content
Interperspectival Content
Abstract
Peter Ludlow argues that perspectival content, or what some call indexical content, is ineliminable and ubiquitous, running through our accounts of human ac...
Communication Using Interperspectival Contents
Communication Using Interperspectival Contents
Abstract
The problem we encounter with any semantic theory that expresses perspectival content is that when we engage in communication we of necessity communicate wi...
Tense and Interperspectival Content
Tense and Interperspectival Content
Abstract
Is tense, as some contend, merely a feature of language (linguistic tense) or is it used to express some perspectival feature of the world? Many have argued...
Conclusion
Conclusion
Abstract
This concluding chapter summarizes the key ideas of the book—that perspectival contents are ubiquitous and run through our accounts of human action, emotion...
Perspectival Shapes are Viewpoint-Dependent Relational Properties: Comment on Burge and Burge (2022)
Perspectival Shapes are Viewpoint-Dependent Relational Properties: Comment on Burge and Burge (2022)
Recently, there is a renewed debate concerning the role of perspective in vision. Morales, Bax, and Firestone (2020) present evidence that, in the case of viewing a rotated coin, t...
Same: Structural sources of anaphora and relativization
Same: Structural sources of anaphora and relativization
This paper offers a unified structural analysis of anaphora and relative clauses licensed by same within definite descriptions. Taking as a point of departure the proposal that ind...

