Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Evaluating the Potential for Citizen Science Divers to Monitor Fish Biodiversity Through Passive eDNA Collection
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT
Environmental DNA (eDNA) marker gene sequencing, or metabarcoding, can be a powerful tool for monitoring marine biodiversity. Traditional eDNA sampling methods involve manual water collection and active filtration to collect DNA. This process can be laborious and require expensive filtration equipment. To explore the possibility of making eDNA a more accessible tool, we investigated the efficacy of passive eDNA capture during citizen science SCUBA diving in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Rather than actively collecting and filtering water samples, filters that passively collected eDNA from seawater were attached to citizen scientist divers as they carried out visual surveys on fish species. eDNA metabarcoding from these filters was amplified using MiFish primers (12S rRNA gene) and sequenced to assess fish community composition and compare to visual surveys. We also investigated marine mammal detection with mitochondrial D‐loop metabarcoding primers on some of the samples. Sequencing results initially yielded 64 fish species, compared to 183 fish species observed by the divers, and shared similar biogeographic assemblage patterns. However, 95 visually observed species lacked publicly available reference sequences. To address this, we generated reference sequences for 64 fish species vouchers obtained from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography Marine Vertebrate Collection. Dedicated barcoding efforts yielded eDNA detections of 15 additional species. We discuss the relative advantages and disadvantages of this passive eDNA collection method for marine fish detection. Marine mammal sequencing results only yielded 3 species; however, one was the Guadalupe fur seal, a threatened species, which highlights the potential of eDNA for rare or threatened marine mammal detection. Our results suggest that passive capture of eDNA can be used as a tool for citizen scientists to supplement visual surveys for marine species detection and is particularly useful for species that are rare or visually inaccessible to divers.
Title: Evaluating the Potential for Citizen Science Divers to Monitor Fish Biodiversity Through Passive
eDNA
Collection
Description:
ABSTRACT
Environmental DNA (eDNA) marker gene sequencing, or metabarcoding, can be a powerful tool for monitoring marine biodiversity.
Traditional eDNA sampling methods involve manual water collection and active filtration to collect DNA.
This process can be laborious and require expensive filtration equipment.
To explore the possibility of making eDNA a more accessible tool, we investigated the efficacy of passive eDNA capture during citizen science SCUBA diving in the Gulf of California, Mexico.
Rather than actively collecting and filtering water samples, filters that passively collected eDNA from seawater were attached to citizen scientist divers as they carried out visual surveys on fish species.
eDNA metabarcoding from these filters was amplified using MiFish primers (12S rRNA gene) and sequenced to assess fish community composition and compare to visual surveys.
We also investigated marine mammal detection with mitochondrial D‐loop metabarcoding primers on some of the samples.
Sequencing results initially yielded 64 fish species, compared to 183 fish species observed by the divers, and shared similar biogeographic assemblage patterns.
However, 95 visually observed species lacked publicly available reference sequences.
To address this, we generated reference sequences for 64 fish species vouchers obtained from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography Marine Vertebrate Collection.
Dedicated barcoding efforts yielded eDNA detections of 15 additional species.
We discuss the relative advantages and disadvantages of this passive eDNA collection method for marine fish detection.
Marine mammal sequencing results only yielded 3 species; however, one was the Guadalupe fur seal, a threatened species, which highlights the potential of eDNA for rare or threatened marine mammal detection.
Our results suggest that passive capture of eDNA can be used as a tool for citizen scientists to supplement visual surveys for marine species detection and is particularly useful for species that are rare or visually inaccessible to divers.
Related Results
Complex interactions between environmental DNA (eDNA) state and water chemistries on eDNA persistence suggested by meta-analyses
Complex interactions between environmental DNA (eDNA) state and water chemistries on eDNA persistence suggested by meta-analyses
Understanding the processes of environmental DNA (eDNA) persistence and
degradation is essential to determine the spatiotemporal scale of eDNA
signals and accurately estimate speci...
Social Economic Determinants of Adoption of Fish Farming in Gem Sub-County, Siaya County, Kenya
Social Economic Determinants of Adoption of Fish Farming in Gem Sub-County, Siaya County, Kenya
The demand for fish in Kenya has been steadily increasing, prompting the exploration of alternative methods such as fish farming to address this rising demand. However, the adoptio...
Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling strategies influence estimates of freshwater fish eDNA concentrations
Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling strategies influence estimates of freshwater fish eDNA concentrations
ABSTRACT
Quantifying
in-situ
environmental DNA (eDNA) concentrations is increasingly used to infer fish abund...
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of pond water as a tool to survey conservation and management priority mammals
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of pond water as a tool to survey conservation and management priority mammals
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is largely used to survey aquatic communities, but ca...
Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Detects Predators at Higher Rates Than Electrofishing
Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Detects Predators at Higher Rates Than Electrofishing
ABSTRACTThere are numerous downsides and risks associated with electrofishing; hence, environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is becoming increasingly common in aquatic ecological s...
Long-read nanopore shotgun eDNA sequencing for river biodiversity, pollution and environmental health monitoring
Long-read nanopore shotgun eDNA sequencing for river biodiversity, pollution and environmental health monitoring
Abstract
As global temperatures rise, species populations and biodiversity decline, and infectious diseases emerge all at unprecedented rates, it is more vital than...
Environmental DNA (eDNA) as a tool for assessing fish biomass: A review of approaches and future considerations for resource surveys
Environmental DNA (eDNA) as a tool for assessing fish biomass: A review of approaches and future considerations for resource surveys
AbstractEnvironmental DNA (eDNA) has revolutionized our ability to identify the presence and distributions of terrestrial and aquatic organisms. Recent evidence suggests the concen...
Passive eDNA collection enhances aquatic biodiversity analysis
Passive eDNA collection enhances aquatic biodiversity analysis
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a sensitive and widely used approach for species detection and biodiversity assessment. The most common eDNA co...

