Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Film Discourse in the Contemporary World: Semiotics and Analysis

View through CrossRef
The most complete characterization of film discourse as a sign system is given below:1. Film discourse refers simultaneously to optical (perceived by sight) and auditory (perceived by hearing) sign systems. 2. Film discourse is non-biological (cultural) natural semiotics, the occurrence of which is not planned or organized.3. Film discourse refers to complex multi-level semiotics. It has subsystems of signs that form a certain hierarchy. Signs in such semiotics are combined according to certain rules, and changing theorder of the location of one sign we change the meaning of the whole combination of signs. 4. Film discourse is an open semiotics that has the ability to interact with the environment.5. Depending on the approach to research, the units of cinema discourse can be considered the minimum non-discrete image units; large segments (frame, plan), which in addition to the visualcomponent include movement, sound, etc.; chain of frames. 6. Cinema discourse is a multi-code semiotics, which is based on several codes that operatewithin each generating system. There are also codes that control the combination of differentsemiotic systems in the movie and work at their junction, genre emotiveness (drama, comedy,tragedy, thriller, etc.), an artistic chronotope in the form of a temporal perspective of a retrospective(futurological film, historical drama) and localization of events - both fictional and real ones (alienlife and events of an abandoned God of Texas town). The cinema discourse also reflects the ethnocultural specific features of both the creators of the film itself and the habitat, coupled with the socioculturalenvironment of their artistic creations.
Title: Film Discourse in the Contemporary World: Semiotics and Analysis
Description:
The most complete characterization of film discourse as a sign system is given below:1.
Film discourse refers simultaneously to optical (perceived by sight) and auditory (perceived by hearing) sign systems.
2.
Film discourse is non-biological (cultural) natural semiotics, the occurrence of which is not planned or organized.
3.
Film discourse refers to complex multi-level semiotics.
It has subsystems of signs that form a certain hierarchy.
Signs in such semiotics are combined according to certain rules, and changing theorder of the location of one sign we change the meaning of the whole combination of signs.
4.
Film discourse is an open semiotics that has the ability to interact with the environment.
5.
Depending on the approach to research, the units of cinema discourse can be considered the minimum non-discrete image units; large segments (frame, plan), which in addition to the visualcomponent include movement, sound, etc.
; chain of frames.
6.
Cinema discourse is a multi-code semiotics, which is based on several codes that operatewithin each generating system.
There are also codes that control the combination of differentsemiotic systems in the movie and work at their junction, genre emotiveness (drama, comedy,tragedy, thriller, etc.
), an artistic chronotope in the form of a temporal perspective of a retrospective(futurological film, historical drama) and localization of events - both fictional and real ones (alienlife and events of an abandoned God of Texas town).
The cinema discourse also reflects the ethnocultural specific features of both the creators of the film itself and the habitat, coupled with the socioculturalenvironment of their artistic creations.

Related Results

Reclaiming the Wasteland: Samson and Delilah and the Historical Perception and Construction of Indigenous Knowledges in Australian Cinema
Reclaiming the Wasteland: Samson and Delilah and the Historical Perception and Construction of Indigenous Knowledges in Australian Cinema
It was always based on a teenage love story between the two kids. One is a sniffer and one is not. It was designed for Central Australia because we do write these kids off there. N...
The Application and Trends of semiotics in design
The Application and Trends of semiotics in design
Semiotics is the study of symbol systems, first proposed at the beginning of this century by the Swiss linguist Saussure, the American philosopher and founder of the philosophy of ...
Alternative Entrances: Phillip Noyce and Sydney’s Counterculture
Alternative Entrances: Phillip Noyce and Sydney’s Counterculture
Phillip Noyce is one of Australia’s most prominent film makers—a successful feature film director with both iconic Australian narratives and many a Hollywood blockbuster under his ...
The Historic Mission of Chinese Semiotic Scholars
The Historic Mission of Chinese Semiotic Scholars
Abstract Semiotics as a science of signs originated from Europe and America where France, the USA and Russia are acknowledged as the three epicenters for semiotics s...
Kritička analiza diskursa o fleksibilizaciji tržišta rada
Kritička analiza diskursa o fleksibilizaciji tržišta rada
The research is focused on the study of public discourse on labor market flexibilization in Croatia during the reform of the Croatian Labor Act which was undertaken by the Croatian...
Discourse Coherence in Chinese
Discourse Coherence in Chinese
Discourse coherence is motivated by the need of the speaker to be understood, which is a psychological phenomenon reflected in the organization of natural discourse. It can be real...
Harry Potter, Inc.
Harry Potter, Inc.
Engagement in any capacity with mainstream media since mid-2001 has meant immersion in the cross-platform, multimedia phenomenon of Harry Potter: Muggle outcast; boy wizard; corpor...
DISCOURSE AND DISCOURSE ANALYSIS IN THE CONCEPT OF SOCIOHUMANITARIAN KNOWLEDGE
DISCOURSE AND DISCOURSE ANALYSIS IN THE CONCEPT OF SOCIOHUMANITARIAN KNOWLEDGE
Purpose of the study: The aim of the scientific work is to develop a new theory of interdisciplinary discourse based on social and humanitarian knowledge. Today, there are many int...

Back to Top