Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Gα s -specific structural elements attenuate interactions with RGS proteins
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Heterotrimeric (αβγ) G proteins are molecular switches that are activated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and regulate numerous intracellular signaling cascades. Most active Gα subunits are inactivated by Regulators of G protein Signaling (RGS) proteins, which determine the duration of G protein-mediated signaling by accelerating the catalytic turn-off of the Gα subunit. However, the G protein Gα
s
does not interact with known RGS proteins. To understand the molecular basis for this divergent phenomenon, we combined a comparative structural analysis of experimental and modelled structures with functional biochemical assays. This analysis showed that Gα
s
contains unique structural elements in both the helical and the GTPase domains. Modeling identified helical domain insertions, missing in experimental structures, that project towards the interface with RGS proteins, and residues in the GTPase domain that might interfere with RGS binding. Mutagenesis of Gα
s
and measurements of RGS GAP activity showed that three residues in the Gα
s
GTPase domain are both necessary and sufficient to prevent Gα
s
inactivation by RGSs. Indeed, substitution of all three Gα
s
residues with the corresponding residues from Gα
i1
enabled efficient inactivation by RGS proteins. These results shed new light on the mechanistic bases for G protein specificity towards RGS proteins.
Title: Gα
s
-specific structural elements attenuate interactions with RGS proteins
Description:
Abstract
Heterotrimeric (αβγ) G proteins are molecular switches that are activated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and regulate numerous intracellular signaling cascades.
Most active Gα subunits are inactivated by Regulators of G protein Signaling (RGS) proteins, which determine the duration of G protein-mediated signaling by accelerating the catalytic turn-off of the Gα subunit.
However, the G protein Gα
s
does not interact with known RGS proteins.
To understand the molecular basis for this divergent phenomenon, we combined a comparative structural analysis of experimental and modelled structures with functional biochemical assays.
This analysis showed that Gα
s
contains unique structural elements in both the helical and the GTPase domains.
Modeling identified helical domain insertions, missing in experimental structures, that project towards the interface with RGS proteins, and residues in the GTPase domain that might interfere with RGS binding.
Mutagenesis of Gα
s
and measurements of RGS GAP activity showed that three residues in the Gα
s
GTPase domain are both necessary and sufficient to prevent Gα
s
inactivation by RGSs.
Indeed, substitution of all three Gα
s
residues with the corresponding residues from Gα
i1
enabled efficient inactivation by RGS proteins.
These results shed new light on the mechanistic bases for G protein specificity towards RGS proteins.
Related Results
To Lay (Eggs) or Not to Lay
To Lay (Eggs) or Not to Lay
The genetic model of the nematode
Caenorhabditis elegans
once again proves its usefulness in determining functions for individual members of large protein f...
YIA5 RGS-1 Regulates Leukocyte Trafficking in Atherosclerosis and Aortic Aneurysm Formation through Chemokine Receptor Desensitisation
YIA5 RGS-1 Regulates Leukocyte Trafficking in Atherosclerosis and Aortic Aneurysm Formation through Chemokine Receptor Desensitisation
The regulation of macrophage recruitment and retention into the vascular wall is critical in the progression of atherosclerosis and aortic aneurysm formation. This can be mediated ...
Restless Genital Syndrome Induced by Milnacipran
Restless Genital Syndrome Induced by Milnacipran
Objectives
Restless genital syndrome (RGS) includes discomfort, pain, numbness, vibration, restlessness, or a burning sensation involving the vagina, perineum, pelvis, ...
RGS proteins maintain robustness of GPCR‐GIRK coupling
RGS proteins maintain robustness of GPCR‐GIRK coupling
Objective
To elucidate the mechanism underlying sustained GPCR‐GIRK coupling under RGS actions.
Result...
Form Follows Force: A theoretical framework for Structural Morphology, and Form-Finding research on shell structures
Form Follows Force: A theoretical framework for Structural Morphology, and Form-Finding research on shell structures
The springing up of freeform architecture and structures introduces many challenges to structural engineers. The main challenge is to generate structural forms with high structural...
Analysis of Nutritional Components in Brown Sugar and Its Effects on Anti-fatigue, Alleviation of Qi Deficiency and Blood Stasis, and Antioxidant Effects
Analysis of Nutritional Components in Brown Sugar and Its Effects on Anti-fatigue, Alleviation of Qi Deficiency and Blood Stasis, and Antioxidant Effects
Abstract
Brown sugar (BS), Red granulated sugar (RGS) and White sugar(WS) are three key sweeteners and food additives in China. Notably, BS possesses significant nu...
Synthesis of graphene-oxadiazole-2-thiol (RGS) / PVA composite and studying Its electric properties
Synthesis of graphene-oxadiazole-2-thiol (RGS) / PVA composite and studying Its electric properties
In this work focused on preparing novel nanocompound Reduce graphene-oxadiazole-2-thiol (RGS), is a derivative of graphene, Which was obtained through a series of reactions on grap...
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TOPICAL METHOTREXATE WITH TRETINOIN VERSUS BETAMETHASONE WITH TRETINOIN IN PATIENTS OF ALOPECIA AREATA: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TOPICAL METHOTREXATE WITH TRETINOIN VERSUS BETAMETHASONE WITH TRETINOIN IN PATIENTS OF ALOPECIA AREATA: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY
Objectives: Alopecia areata (AA) is a reiterative and non-scarring type of hair loss that can affect any hairy area of the body, particularly the scalp. The present study is aimed ...

