Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Other Republicanisms

View through CrossRef
This chapter examines two non-classical strands of the republican tradition—one Calvinist, the other Conciliarist: both significantly different from the Roman model, as well as from each other, and both equally pervasive in the ecclesio-political discourses of Shakespeare’s era. The Huguenot Cornelius Bertram’sDe politica Judaica(1574) proved massively influential. Although this work portrayed the early Hebrew state as a mixed polity governed by representative institutions, he regarded those institutions as judicial rather than legislative bodies, since the Jews were strictly governed by God’s law. Bertram’s Calvinist republicanism has no place for an independent secular sphere. By contrast the conciliarist Jacque Almain’sExpositio circa decisions Magistri Guillielmi Occam, super potestate summi pontificus(1512) regarded reason as the ultimate source of political authority, making the collective judgments of rational men superior to the decrees of popes and kings. Neither view conforms to the classical republicanism described by modern scholarship.
Oxford University Press
Title: Other Republicanisms
Description:
This chapter examines two non-classical strands of the republican tradition—one Calvinist, the other Conciliarist: both significantly different from the Roman model, as well as from each other, and both equally pervasive in the ecclesio-political discourses of Shakespeare’s era.
The Huguenot Cornelius Bertram’sDe politica Judaica(1574) proved massively influential.
Although this work portrayed the early Hebrew state as a mixed polity governed by representative institutions, he regarded those institutions as judicial rather than legislative bodies, since the Jews were strictly governed by God’s law.
Bertram’s Calvinist republicanism has no place for an independent secular sphere.
By contrast the conciliarist Jacque Almain’sExpositio circa decisions Magistri Guillielmi Occam, super potestate summi pontificus(1512) regarded reason as the ultimate source of political authority, making the collective judgments of rational men superior to the decrees of popes and kings.
Neither view conforms to the classical republicanism described by modern scholarship.

Related Results

Nationalism: Past as Prologue
Nationalism: Past as Prologue
Nationalism: Past as Prologue began as a single volume being compiled by Ad Akande, a scholar from South Africa, who proposed it to me as co-author about two years ago. The origina...
Emmanuel Levinas: Um estudo sobre a ética da alteridade
Emmanuel Levinas: Um estudo sobre a ética da alteridade
The general objective of this study is to analyze the postulate of the ethics of otherness as the first philosophy, presented by Emmanuel Levinas. It is a proposal that runs throug...
Breaking Point
Breaking Point
The post-Cold War order established by the United States of America is currently at a crossroads. No longer is the liberal order and United States hegemonic power a given. Moscow a...
Conclusion
Conclusion
THERE ARE BROAD areas in which churches and, more generally, religious organizations enjoy tax exemption. On the other hand, churches and other religious entities pay more taxes th...
Praeger International Collection on Addictions
Praeger International Collection on Addictions
Only the very rare among us are completely unscathed by the effects of addiction - our own, that of a family member, friend, or coworker. Even the addictions of strangers - from th...
On Animals
On Animals
This book presents an authoritative and comprehensive survey of human practice in relation to other animals, together with a Christian ethical analysis building on the theological ...
1872 to 1875
1872 to 1875
Tensions on the plains increased as Americans, including Quaker reservation officials, put more pressures and restrictions on Kiowas and other Native peoples. Indians experienced h...

Back to Top