Coronary access after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Abstract Introduction Over the past two decades, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has transformed the management of aortic stenosis, initially for high-risk surgical candidates and subsequently for low-risk patients. However, with the expanding indications for TAVR to younger, lower-risk patients, it is crucial to assess not only the short-term clinical outcomes but also the long-term considerations for future interventions. The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in TAVR patients is relevant, and the optimal timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains a question, given the technical challenges associated with coronary access in TAVR patients. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis according to Cochrane Collaborations and PRISMA guidelines. We included 19 eligible trials involving 1533 patients who underwent coronary angiography after TAVR. The primary endpoint was the incidence of successful selective coronary re-access. Secondary endpoints included semi-selective and non-selective access rates. The analysis was stratified by balloon-expandable (BEVs) and self-expandable valve (SEVs) types. Results Successful coronary access after TAVR was feasible in the majority of patients, with a higher success rate observed for the left main coronary artery (LM) compared to the right coronary artery (RCA). Balloon-expandable valves demonstrated the highest success rates in coronary ostia cannulation, achieving nearly 100% success for both LM and RCA. Among self-expandable valves, the Evolut R/PRO showed superior success rates in selective coronary access (76,85% (95%CI 53,34-100%) for LM and 57,27% (95%CI 32,8-81,74%) for RCA) compared to the CoreValve (45,62% (95%CI 0-92,78%) for LM and 49,19% (95%CI 0-100%) for RCA). Notably, the majority of coronary angiograms were performed due to acute coronary syndrome, primarily non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA), 26,5% for NSTEMI and 23,4% for UA, respectively. Conclusions Selective coronary engagement after TAVR is generally achievable, with BEVs demonstrating superior success rates compared to SEVs. Among self-expandable valves, the Evolut R/PRO showed better outcomes than the CoreValve. These findings provide valuable insights into post-TAVR coronary access feasibility, reducing concerns about valve selection based on this criterion