Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Effect of substrate and adhesive system type on composite resin restorations
View through CrossRef
Although it is possible to obtain a reliable bond between enamel and composite resin, the ideal bonding method of composite resin to dentin still needs to be developed. Variables such as the type of adhesive system used and type of dentin substrate can influence on the adhesion. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of composite resin restorations to human and bovine dentin using three adhesive systems. Material and methods: Fifteen human third molars sectioned into two halves and 30 bovine incisors were cut into blocks (4x4mm), embedded in acrylic resin and ground flat to expose the dentin. The specimens were randomly divided into six groups (n = 10): group 1 – human dentin using Scotchbond Multi-Purpose; group 2 – human dentin using Adper Single Bond 2; group 3 – human dentin using Adper Prompt L-Pop; group 4 – bovine dentin using Scotchbond Multi-Purpose; group 5 – bovine dentin using Adper Single Bond 2; group 6 – bovine dentin using Adper Prompt L-Pop. After composite resin restoration procedure, the specimens were stored into distilled water for 24h at 37ºC and then submitted to the shear test using a universal testing machine. The failure patterns were examined microscopically and classified as adhesive, cohesive in resin, cohesive in dentin or both, and mixed. The ANOVA (two-way) and Tukey’s post hoc were used. Chi-square test for independence was used for analysis of failure mode. The significance level was set at 5%. Results: A significant difference in shear bond strength was observed among adhesive systems (p = 0.031), with higher values for one-bottle adhesive (8.87±2.72) and lower for self-etching (6.38±3.15), and between the two types of substrate (p = 0.018), with higher values for human dentin. However, there was no significant difference for the adhesive system/substrate interaction (p = 0.11). Adhesive failure was the predominant failure mode for all adhesive systems and for the two substrates. Conclusion: Shear bond strength was different between human and bovine substrates and for the adhesive system used.
Fundacao Educacional da Regiao de Joinville - Univille
Title: Effect of substrate and adhesive system type on composite resin restorations
Description:
Although it is possible to obtain a reliable bond between enamel and composite resin, the ideal bonding method of composite resin to dentin still needs to be developed.
Variables such as the type of adhesive system used and type of dentin substrate can influence on the adhesion.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of composite resin restorations to human and bovine dentin using three adhesive systems.
Material and methods: Fifteen human third molars sectioned into two halves and 30 bovine incisors were cut into blocks (4x4mm), embedded in acrylic resin and ground flat to expose the dentin.
The specimens were randomly divided into six groups (n = 10): group 1 – human dentin using Scotchbond Multi-Purpose; group 2 – human dentin using Adper Single Bond 2; group 3 – human dentin using Adper Prompt L-Pop; group 4 – bovine dentin using Scotchbond Multi-Purpose; group 5 – bovine dentin using Adper Single Bond 2; group 6 – bovine dentin using Adper Prompt L-Pop.
After composite resin restoration procedure, the specimens were stored into distilled water for 24h at 37ºC and then submitted to the shear test using a universal testing machine.
The failure patterns were examined microscopically and classified as adhesive, cohesive in resin, cohesive in dentin or both, and mixed.
The ANOVA (two-way) and Tukey’s post hoc were used.
Chi-square test for independence was used for analysis of failure mode.
The significance level was set at 5%.
Results: A significant difference in shear bond strength was observed among adhesive systems (p = 0.
031), with higher values for one-bottle adhesive (8.
87±2.
72) and lower for self-etching (6.
38±3.
15), and between the two types of substrate (p = 0.
018), with higher values for human dentin.
However, there was no significant difference for the adhesive system/substrate interaction (p = 0.
11).
Adhesive failure was the predominant failure mode for all adhesive systems and for the two substrates.
Conclusion: Shear bond strength was different between human and bovine substrates and for the adhesive system used.
.
Related Results
Six-year Clinical Evaluation of Packable Composite Restorations
Six-year Clinical Evaluation of Packable Composite Restorations
SUMMARY
Objective: For decades, resin composites have been used with increasing frequency as posterior restorative materials, because of the demand for aesthetic restoratio...
PENGARUH PERIODE PEMANENAN RESIN DAMAR TERHADAP PENDAPATAN PETANI REPONG DAMAR DI PEKON LABUHAN MANDI PESISIR BARAT
PENGARUH PERIODE PEMANENAN RESIN DAMAR TERHADAP PENDAPATAN PETANI REPONG DAMAR DI PEKON LABUHAN MANDI PESISIR BARAT
Repong Damar is a plot of land planted with various types of productive plants from various types of timber with economic value. The term repong damar is because the plant that is ...
Total Rehabilitation Using Adhesive Dental Restorations in Patients with Severe Tooth Wear: A 5-Year Retrospective Case Series Study
Total Rehabilitation Using Adhesive Dental Restorations in Patients with Severe Tooth Wear: A 5-Year Retrospective Case Series Study
Introduction: Currently, there is little clinical evidence to support the medium- and long-term survival and clinical performance of ultraconservative approaches using adhesive res...
Plastcementer
Plastcementer
English summary
Resin cements
532 – 7.
Tooth-coloured indirect restorations are becoming increasingly popular as alternatives to amalga...
Flexural strength of 3D printed posterior dental restorations: A Narrative review of the literature
Flexural strength of 3D printed posterior dental restorations: A Narrative review of the literature
The objective of this narrative review was to compare and analyze published articles on the mechanical properties of 3D printed fixed dental restorations compared to restorations f...
Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to deep dentin
Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to deep dentin
Introduction and objective: Self-adhesive resin cements are applied in only one clinical step whose technique is considered less sensitive and of easy handling. However, there is s...
Clinical Effectiveness of a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and a Mild One-step Self-etch Adhesive Applied Actively and Passively in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: An 18-Month Clinical Trial
Clinical Effectiveness of a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and a Mild One-step Self-etch Adhesive Applied Actively and Passively in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: An 18-Month Clinical Trial
SUMMARY
Objectives:
To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of two methods of application of a mild one-step self-etch adhesive a...
Bond strength of dentin submitted to bleaching and restored with different materials
Bond strength of dentin submitted to bleaching and restored with different materials
The use of adhesive composite resin with fluoride and with greater fluidity can be favorable to the restoration of the palatal/lingual face of teeth submitted to internal bleaching...

