Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Abstract P5-16-11: Intraoperative central nipple biopsy in subcutaneous mastectomies - A retrospective analysis of 200 patients

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background: Subcutaneous nipple sparing mastectomies (NSM) are an important tool in modern oncoplastic surgery. Especially when an immediate implant-based reconstruction (IBR) is desired, clean margins are of the utmost importance. Central nipple biopsies during surgery serve two main purposes. Most importantly, it is hypothesized that a general recurrence risk reduction occurs due to elimination of glandular and ductal components within the nipple. In addition, intraoperative pathological evaluation of this biopsy may increase clean margin resection rates. This trial aimed to evaluate complication rates, local recurrence and clean margin resection rates in a head-to-head retrospective manner. Methods: Starting in 2015, intraoperative central nipple biopsy in NSM with IBR was introduced at the Municipal Breast Cancer Centre Cologne, Holweide, Germany. This trial evaluates global complication rates (necrosis, implant loss, seroma and hematoma), long term local recurrence and clean margin status for cohort 1 (n=100) SSM with nipple biopsy vs. cohort 2 (control, n = 100) without nipple biopsy. In case of an involved central nipple biopsy, the nipple areola complex was removed. This analysis is a single center, multi-surgeon, retrospective, head to head analysis. Median follow-up is three years. All IBR procedures used an epipectoral implant pocket. Results: Global complication rates did not differ significantly between both cohorts. There was no increased rate of implant loss and or revision surgery. Within the medium three-year follow-up there was no case of local recurrence within nipple areola complex for both cohorts. An Involved central nipple biopsy was however found in 2% (n=2 /100) of the performed SSM procedures leading to the immediate removal of the nipple areola complex. Surgical time did not increase with central biopsy. A significantly higher rate of re-surgery due to involved margins was shown in the control cohort. Conclusions: This analysis showed that intraoperative evaluation of the ductal components of the nipple is a safe procedure. At least 2% of the patients showed an immediate advantage of this procedure since clean margins were obtained by removing the nipple areola complex during the same surgery. The medium follow-up showed no significant difference in local recurrence. We therefore strongly, recommend a central nipple biopsy for all NSM procedures. Citation Format: Eichler C, Stephan S, Thangarajah F, Puppe J, Mathias W. Intraoperative central nipple biopsy in subcutaneous mastectomies - A retrospective analysis of 200 patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-16-11.
Title: Abstract P5-16-11: Intraoperative central nipple biopsy in subcutaneous mastectomies - A retrospective analysis of 200 patients
Description:
Abstract Background: Subcutaneous nipple sparing mastectomies (NSM) are an important tool in modern oncoplastic surgery.
Especially when an immediate implant-based reconstruction (IBR) is desired, clean margins are of the utmost importance.
Central nipple biopsies during surgery serve two main purposes.
Most importantly, it is hypothesized that a general recurrence risk reduction occurs due to elimination of glandular and ductal components within the nipple.
In addition, intraoperative pathological evaluation of this biopsy may increase clean margin resection rates.
This trial aimed to evaluate complication rates, local recurrence and clean margin resection rates in a head-to-head retrospective manner.
Methods: Starting in 2015, intraoperative central nipple biopsy in NSM with IBR was introduced at the Municipal Breast Cancer Centre Cologne, Holweide, Germany.
This trial evaluates global complication rates (necrosis, implant loss, seroma and hematoma), long term local recurrence and clean margin status for cohort 1 (n=100) SSM with nipple biopsy vs.
cohort 2 (control, n = 100) without nipple biopsy.
In case of an involved central nipple biopsy, the nipple areola complex was removed.
This analysis is a single center, multi-surgeon, retrospective, head to head analysis.
Median follow-up is three years.
All IBR procedures used an epipectoral implant pocket.
Results: Global complication rates did not differ significantly between both cohorts.
There was no increased rate of implant loss and or revision surgery.
Within the medium three-year follow-up there was no case of local recurrence within nipple areola complex for both cohorts.
An Involved central nipple biopsy was however found in 2% (n=2 /100) of the performed SSM procedures leading to the immediate removal of the nipple areola complex.
Surgical time did not increase with central biopsy.
A significantly higher rate of re-surgery due to involved margins was shown in the control cohort.
Conclusions: This analysis showed that intraoperative evaluation of the ductal components of the nipple is a safe procedure.
At least 2% of the patients showed an immediate advantage of this procedure since clean margins were obtained by removing the nipple areola complex during the same surgery.
The medium follow-up showed no significant difference in local recurrence.
We therefore strongly, recommend a central nipple biopsy for all NSM procedures.
Citation Format: Eichler C, Stephan S, Thangarajah F, Puppe J, Mathias W.
Intraoperative central nipple biopsy in subcutaneous mastectomies - A retrospective analysis of 200 patients [abstract].
In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX.
Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-16-11.

Related Results

Nipple Involvement in Breast Cancer: Retrospective Analysis of 2323 Consecutive Mastectomy Specimens
Nipple Involvement in Breast Cancer: Retrospective Analysis of 2323 Consecutive Mastectomy Specimens
Breast cancer surgical options now include nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), but there has been much controversy regarding the oncologic safety of the preserved nipple. This study e...
Corrective surgery for nipple depression in patients with plasmacytic mastitis – A single-center experience
Corrective surgery for nipple depression in patients with plasmacytic mastitis – A single-center experience
BackgroundPlasma cell mastitis (PCM) is a complex breast disease in the clinic. Currently, there are no unified diagnostic criteria for the disease and no standard treatment method...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Primary Thyroid Non-Hodgkin B-Cell Lymphoma: A Case Series
Primary Thyroid Non-Hodgkin B-Cell Lymphoma: A Case Series
Abstract Introduction Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) of the thyroid, a rare malignancy linked to autoimmune disorders, is poorly understood in terms of its pathogenesis and treatment o...
How to Preserve the Nipple Erogenous Sensation in Breast Lifting and Reduction Mammaplasties
How to Preserve the Nipple Erogenous Sensation in Breast Lifting and Reduction Mammaplasties
Preservation of nipple sensitivity after breast reduction is an important goal to achieve. However, most breast reduction techniques focus more on breast aesthetics and nipple areo...
The angel flap for nipple reconstruction
The angel flap for nipple reconstruction
Creation of an aesthetically pleasing nipple plays a significant role in breast reconstruction as a determining factor in patient satisfaction. The goals for nipple reconstruction ...

Back to Top