Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Svetozar Marković and the main trends of European socialism (1840-1890)

View through CrossRef
Different intellectual traditions and periods have interpreted Svetozar Marković's work in completely different ways. According to the majority of authors, Marković ranks among social utopians whose thought was crucially influenced by Russian populism. Certain theoreticians look at him as a founder of particular Balkan socialism, while others consider his work close to Marxism or even anarchism. Furthermore, in the intellectual public there is no consensus about whether Marković's thought is rational and progressive, or irrational and anti-modernist. While most authors believe that Marković was a progressive thinker, some of them, particularly those from the circle of modern Serbian liberals, believe that his thought is anti-modernist. The main goal of this paper is to establish what type of Socialism was "preached" by Svetozar Marković and whether he can be ranked among progressive intellectual forces. That is why Marković's worldview has been compared with the theoretical postulates of Marx, Chernyshevsky, Bakunin and Proudhon, the most significant socialists in the period 1840-1890. The main conclusion of this paper is that Svetozar Marković was a progressive thinker and that he should be considered a libertarian multilinear Marxist with revisionist tendencies or a syntheticist of Marxism and Russian populism.
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Title: Svetozar Marković and the main trends of European socialism (1840-1890)
Description:
Different intellectual traditions and periods have interpreted Svetozar Marković's work in completely different ways.
According to the majority of authors, Marković ranks among social utopians whose thought was crucially influenced by Russian populism.
Certain theoreticians look at him as a founder of particular Balkan socialism, while others consider his work close to Marxism or even anarchism.
Furthermore, in the intellectual public there is no consensus about whether Marković's thought is rational and progressive, or irrational and anti-modernist.
While most authors believe that Marković was a progressive thinker, some of them, particularly those from the circle of modern Serbian liberals, believe that his thought is anti-modernist.
The main goal of this paper is to establish what type of Socialism was "preached" by Svetozar Marković and whether he can be ranked among progressive intellectual forces.
That is why Marković's worldview has been compared with the theoretical postulates of Marx, Chernyshevsky, Bakunin and Proudhon, the most significant socialists in the period 1840-1890.
The main conclusion of this paper is that Svetozar Marković was a progressive thinker and that he should be considered a libertarian multilinear Marxist with revisionist tendencies or a syntheticist of Marxism and Russian populism.

Related Results

Svetozar Marković (1846-1875) in the culture of remembrance among the Serbs
Svetozar Marković (1846-1875) in the culture of remembrance among the Serbs
The author of the paper explores Svetozar Marković’s place in the culture of remembrance among the Serbs, with a special overview of institutional and monumental forms preserving a...
Svetozar Marković and Swiss democracy
Svetozar Marković and Swiss democracy
Svetozar Marković (1846-1875) lived in Switzerland in 1869-1870 and during that time he became acquainted with the Swiss system of direct democracy, especially in the canton of Zur...
SOCIJALISTIČKA MISAO I „ŽENSKO PITANjE“ – SVETOZAR MARKOVIĆ I DIMITRIJE TUCOVIĆ
SOCIJALISTIČKA MISAO I „ŽENSKO PITANjE“ – SVETOZAR MARKOVIĆ I DIMITRIJE TUCOVIĆ
To understand the discourse that the socialists had towards the Woman Question, the texts of Svetozar Markovic, Oslobođenje ženskinja and Pevanje i mišljenje were analyzed, as well...
The Sociology of Socialism: A Review and Prospectus
The Sociology of Socialism: A Review and Prospectus
Is socialism still relevant for sociology? Sociology and socialism are entwined logically and historically. But today, American sociology seems mostly silent about socialism. This ...
Gandhi and Socialism
Gandhi and Socialism
Gandhi, along with other leaders in India’s Freedom Movement, clearly identifies himself as a socialist. We now live in an India and world dominated by finance capital and big corp...
Introduction: Socialism and History
Introduction: Socialism and History
This introductory chapter provides an overview of the book's main themes. This book traces ways in which people collectively made various socialist projects in a complex world of m...
Mazzinianesimo, fascismo, comunismo: l'itinerario politico di Delio Cantimori (1919-1943)
Mazzinianesimo, fascismo, comunismo: l'itinerario politico di Delio Cantimori (1919-1943)
Delio Cantimori (1904-1966) was one of the most important Italian historians of the twentieth century. His studies on sixteenth-century religious history, on Italian 'Jacobinism' a...
LANDASAN ONTOLOGIS SOSIALISME
LANDASAN ONTOLOGIS SOSIALISME
Socialism is an ideology assumed that shared ownership is the best way of life. Socialism did not proposed any private property because it makes people selfish and destroy the comm...

Back to Top