Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Effects of Floor Roughness on Shoe-Floor Friction Adhesion and Hysteresis

View through CrossRef
Slip and fall accidents are a major source of occupational accidents. The coefficient of friction (CoF) that is required for gait is approximately 0.2. Floor roughness has been demonstrated to affect the available CoF. Building on this knowledge, this research aims to investigate the effect of changing floor roughness on two components of friction: adhesion and hysteresis. The experiments were carried out using a custom developed pin-on-disk type tribometer. Two common types of rubber shoe material, with Shore A hardness 50 and 95, were slid over ceramic tiles that were prepared to different roughness levels. The tiles were abraded using aluminum oxide media (commonly called “sand blasting”). Three levels of roughness were achieved, measured using the average peak height (Rz) with a stylus profilometer: 16.6 μm, 24.3 μm, and 34.6 μm. The experiments were conducted at 0.01 m sec-1 at a contact pressure of 266.1 kPa under ambient conditions to specifically examine the role of adhesion and hysteresis in the absence of hydrodynamic effects. The coefficient of friction was recorded without lubricant (dry) and lubricated with: 2% detergent solution, canola oil, and SAE 75W140 gear oil. Hysteresis was measured with SAE 75W140 because the high lubricity of the gear oil minimizes adhesion. Adhesion in dry and wet conditions was measured by subtracting the hysteresis from the coefficient of friction. Hysteresis was found to increase from 0.101 to 0.358 for the hard rubber and from 0.269 to 0.611 for the soft rubber when floor roughness was increased from 16.6 μm and 34.6 μm. Higher roughness was also associated with a decrease in dry adhesion from 0.651 to 0.277 for the hard rubber and from 0.435 to 0.041 for the soft rubber. Wet adhesion decreased from 0.285 to 0.049 for soft rubber on detergent. Canola oil, for both hard and soft, and detergent combined with hard rubber did not make a significant difference in the adhesion available. Hysteresis, which is a more robust form of friction in the presence of fluids, was found to be positively correlated with floor roughness while adhesion was negatively correlated with roughness. This indicates that increased floor friction is associated with better floor slip-resistance in the presence of fluids. Abrasively blasting floor tiles to increase the roughness of the floor surface, may lead to improved boundary lubrication friction, particularly when accompanied by soft shoe materials.
Title: The Effects of Floor Roughness on Shoe-Floor Friction Adhesion and Hysteresis
Description:
Slip and fall accidents are a major source of occupational accidents.
The coefficient of friction (CoF) that is required for gait is approximately 0.
2.
Floor roughness has been demonstrated to affect the available CoF.
Building on this knowledge, this research aims to investigate the effect of changing floor roughness on two components of friction: adhesion and hysteresis.
The experiments were carried out using a custom developed pin-on-disk type tribometer.
Two common types of rubber shoe material, with Shore A hardness 50 and 95, were slid over ceramic tiles that were prepared to different roughness levels.
The tiles were abraded using aluminum oxide media (commonly called “sand blasting”).
Three levels of roughness were achieved, measured using the average peak height (Rz) with a stylus profilometer: 16.
6 μm, 24.
3 μm, and 34.
6 μm.
The experiments were conducted at 0.
01 m sec-1 at a contact pressure of 266.
1 kPa under ambient conditions to specifically examine the role of adhesion and hysteresis in the absence of hydrodynamic effects.
The coefficient of friction was recorded without lubricant (dry) and lubricated with: 2% detergent solution, canola oil, and SAE 75W140 gear oil.
Hysteresis was measured with SAE 75W140 because the high lubricity of the gear oil minimizes adhesion.
Adhesion in dry and wet conditions was measured by subtracting the hysteresis from the coefficient of friction.
Hysteresis was found to increase from 0.
101 to 0.
358 for the hard rubber and from 0.
269 to 0.
611 for the soft rubber when floor roughness was increased from 16.
6 μm and 34.
6 μm.
Higher roughness was also associated with a decrease in dry adhesion from 0.
651 to 0.
277 for the hard rubber and from 0.
435 to 0.
041 for the soft rubber.
Wet adhesion decreased from 0.
285 to 0.
049 for soft rubber on detergent.
Canola oil, for both hard and soft, and detergent combined with hard rubber did not make a significant difference in the adhesion available.
Hysteresis, which is a more robust form of friction in the presence of fluids, was found to be positively correlated with floor roughness while adhesion was negatively correlated with roughness.
This indicates that increased floor friction is associated with better floor slip-resistance in the presence of fluids.
Abrasively blasting floor tiles to increase the roughness of the floor surface, may lead to improved boundary lubrication friction, particularly when accompanied by soft shoe materials.

Related Results

Experimental and Modeling Studies for Understanding Shoe-Floor-Contaminant Friction and Designing for Slip-Resistance
Experimental and Modeling Studies for Understanding Shoe-Floor-Contaminant Friction and Designing for Slip-Resistance
Insufficient friction at the shoe-floor interface causes a large number of slip and falling accidents each year. Developing solutions for enhancing shoe-floor-contaminant friction ...
Influence of process variables on shoe polish viscosity
Influence of process variables on shoe polish viscosity
Valourisation of non-biodegradable wastes into value added products like shoe polish can indeed be an effective tool for waste management and climate change mitigation. However, ha...
Influence of initial braking velocity and braking frequency on tribological performance of non‐asbestos brake shoe
Influence of initial braking velocity and braking frequency on tribological performance of non‐asbestos brake shoe
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to find the influence of the initial braking velocity and braking frequency on the tribological performance of the non‐asbestos brake shoe used ...
Spatiotemporal organisation of protein nanoclusters in adhesion complexes
Spatiotemporal organisation of protein nanoclusters in adhesion complexes
The main goal of this thesis was to contribute to the understanding of the nanoscale lateral organisation of key proteins in adhesion complexes. For this, we exploited single molec...
Unveiling heterogeneity of hysteresis in perovskite thin films
Unveiling heterogeneity of hysteresis in perovskite thin films
AbstractThe phenomenon of current–voltage hysteresis observed in perovskite-based optoelectronic devices is a critical issue that complicates the accurate assessment of device para...
Relationship between Slip Resistance of Shoe Sole and Materials and Floor Conditions
Relationship between Slip Resistance of Shoe Sole and Materials and Floor Conditions
Relationship between slip resistance of shoe sole and materials and floor conditions was studied by Mark II slipmeter in order to improve the slip resistance of shoe sole. The resu...
Tuning the Friction of Silicon Surfaces Using Nanopatterns at the Nanoscale
Tuning the Friction of Silicon Surfaces Using Nanopatterns at the Nanoscale
Friction and wear become significant at small scale lengths, particularly in MEMS/NEMS. Nanopatterns are regarded as a potential approach to solve these problems. In this paper, we...
Strongly different adhesion reduction for 1D or 2D random fractal roughness
Strongly different adhesion reduction for 1D or 2D random fractal roughness
Abstract Afferrante Violano & Dini ("How does roughness kill adhesion?" J Mech Phys Solids 2023 105465) have recently studied by a finite element-based model how roughn...

Back to Top