Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Unraveling the impact of dog‐friendly spaces on urban–wildland pumas and other wildlife

View through CrossRef
As the most widespread large carnivore on the planet, domestic dogs Canis lupus familiaris can pose a major threat to wildlife, even within protected areas (PAs). Growing human presence in PAs, coupled with increasing pet dog ownership underscores the urgency to understand the influence of dogs on wildlife activity and health. This knowledge can mitigate the adverse repercussions of recreation, optimizing PA management. Drawing on five years (2017–2021) of data from 101 camera traps in the San Francisco Bay Area, California, United States, we measured the spatiotemporal responses of puma Puma concolor , bobcat Lynx rufus , coyote Canis latrans , and mule deer Odocoileus hemionus towards domestic dogs. Additionally, using six years (2017–2022) of community science data, we explored the impacts of PA dog policies on puma sightings outside park boundaries. Puma responses provide insights into broader ecological impacts, while analyses of bobcat, coyote, and mule deer offer a comprehensive understanding of species responses to dog‐friendly spaces. Because dogs can be perceived as predators or competitors by wildlife, we anticipated shifts in spatial and temporal activity patterns in response to dogs. Wildlife responses included avoidance (bobcat, puma) or spatial overlap (mule deer) for areas with more dogs, and no effect (coyote). Mule deer may benefit from a “human shield” provided by people with dogs, while pumas and bobcats appeared more sensitive, and coyotes more adaptable. Dog policies influenced puma and mule deer temporal activity, with increased nocturnal activity in dog‐friendly PAs. Bobcat temporal activity was less variable in dog‐friendly PAs and coyote activity was similar between treatments. Outside PAs, puma sightings increased with human disturbance. Our study underscores the trade‐offs between recreation and wildlife conservation, emphasizing the need to quantify the ecological impacts of dogs. This understanding is vital for informing conservation strategies and promoting coexistence between dogs, wildlife, and protected environments.
Title: Unraveling the impact of dog‐friendly spaces on urban–wildland pumas and other wildlife
Description:
As the most widespread large carnivore on the planet, domestic dogs Canis lupus familiaris can pose a major threat to wildlife, even within protected areas (PAs).
Growing human presence in PAs, coupled with increasing pet dog ownership underscores the urgency to understand the influence of dogs on wildlife activity and health.
This knowledge can mitigate the adverse repercussions of recreation, optimizing PA management.
Drawing on five years (2017–2021) of data from 101 camera traps in the San Francisco Bay Area, California, United States, we measured the spatiotemporal responses of puma Puma concolor , bobcat Lynx rufus , coyote Canis latrans , and mule deer Odocoileus hemionus towards domestic dogs.
Additionally, using six years (2017–2022) of community science data, we explored the impacts of PA dog policies on puma sightings outside park boundaries.
Puma responses provide insights into broader ecological impacts, while analyses of bobcat, coyote, and mule deer offer a comprehensive understanding of species responses to dog‐friendly spaces.
Because dogs can be perceived as predators or competitors by wildlife, we anticipated shifts in spatial and temporal activity patterns in response to dogs.
Wildlife responses included avoidance (bobcat, puma) or spatial overlap (mule deer) for areas with more dogs, and no effect (coyote).
Mule deer may benefit from a “human shield” provided by people with dogs, while pumas and bobcats appeared more sensitive, and coyotes more adaptable.
Dog policies influenced puma and mule deer temporal activity, with increased nocturnal activity in dog‐friendly PAs.
Bobcat temporal activity was less variable in dog‐friendly PAs and coyote activity was similar between treatments.
Outside PAs, puma sightings increased with human disturbance.
Our study underscores the trade‐offs between recreation and wildlife conservation, emphasizing the need to quantify the ecological impacts of dogs.
This understanding is vital for informing conservation strategies and promoting coexistence between dogs, wildlife, and protected environments.

Related Results

Are pumas subordinate carnivores, and does it matter?
Are pumas subordinate carnivores, and does it matter?
BackgroundInterspecific competition affects species fitness, community assemblages and structure, and the geographic distributions of species. Established dominance hierarchies amo...
A Touch of Space Weather - Outreach project for visually impaired students
A Touch of Space Weather - Outreach project for visually impaired students
<p><em><span data-preserver-spaces="true">'A Touch of Space Weather' is a project that brings space weather science into...
Habitat selection when killing primary versus alternative prey species supports prey specialization in an apex predator
Habitat selection when killing primary versus alternative prey species supports prey specialization in an apex predator
© 2019 The Zoological Society of London Many predators specialize on one or several prey species that they select from the range of potential prey. Predator specialization on prima...
Territories -in- between
Territories -in- between
There is an increasing body of literature suggesting that the conventional idea of a gradual transition in spatial structure from urban to rural does not properly reflect contempor...
Puma spatial ecology in open habitats with aggregate prey
Puma spatial ecology in open habitats with aggregate prey
Solitary felids are commonly associated with structurally complex habitats, where their foraging success is attributed to stealth and remaining undetected by competitive scavengers...
Puma spatial ecology in open habitats with aggregate prey
Puma spatial ecology in open habitats with aggregate prey
Solitary felids are commonly associated with structurally complex habitats, where their foraging success is attributed to stealth and remaining undetected by competitive scavengers...
Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Crop Loss Caused by Wildlife
Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Crop Loss Caused by Wildlife
The scope of wildlife has expanded with the implementation of ecological restoration projects. Therefore, the number of conflicts between humans and wildlife in agricultural produc...

Back to Top