Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Unraveling the impact of dog‐friendly spaces on urban–wildland pumas and other wildlife
View through CrossRef
As the most widespread large carnivore on the planet, domestic dogs Canis lupus familiaris can pose a major threat to wildlife, even within protected areas (PAs). Growing human presence in PAs, coupled with increasing pet dog ownership underscores the urgency to understand the influence of dogs on wildlife activity and health. This knowledge can mitigate the adverse repercussions of recreation, optimizing PA management. Drawing on five years (2017–2021) of data from 101 camera traps in the San Francisco Bay Area, California, United States, we measured the spatiotemporal responses of puma Puma concolor, bobcat Lynx rufus, coyote Canis latrans, and mule deer Odocoileus hemionus towards domestic dogs. Additionally, using six years (2017–2022) of community science data, we explored the impacts of PA dog policies on puma sightings outside park boundaries. Puma responses provide insights into broader ecological impacts, while analyses of bobcat, coyote, and mule deer offer a comprehensive understanding of species responses to dog‐friendly spaces. Because dogs can be perceived as predators or competitors by wildlife, we anticipated shifts in spatial and temporal activity patterns in response to dogs. Wildlife responses included avoidance (bobcat, puma) or spatial overlap (mule deer) for areas with more dogs, and no effect (coyote). Mule deer may benefit from a “human shield” provided by people with dogs, while pumas and bobcats appeared more sensitive, and coyotes more adaptable. Dog policies influenced puma and mule deer temporal activity, with increased nocturnal activity in dog‐friendly PAs. Bobcat temporal activity was less variable in dog‐friendly PAs and coyote activity was similar between treatments. Outside PAs, puma sightings increased with human disturbance. Our study underscores the trade‐offs between recreation and wildlife conservation, emphasizing the need to quantify the ecological impacts of dogs. This understanding is vital for informing conservation strategies and promoting coexistence between dogs, wildlife, and protected environments.
Title: Unraveling the impact of dog‐friendly spaces on urban–wildland pumas and other wildlife
Description:
As the most widespread large carnivore on the planet, domestic dogs Canis lupus familiaris can pose a major threat to wildlife, even within protected areas (PAs).
Growing human presence in PAs, coupled with increasing pet dog ownership underscores the urgency to understand the influence of dogs on wildlife activity and health.
This knowledge can mitigate the adverse repercussions of recreation, optimizing PA management.
Drawing on five years (2017–2021) of data from 101 camera traps in the San Francisco Bay Area, California, United States, we measured the spatiotemporal responses of puma Puma concolor, bobcat Lynx rufus, coyote Canis latrans, and mule deer Odocoileus hemionus towards domestic dogs.
Additionally, using six years (2017–2022) of community science data, we explored the impacts of PA dog policies on puma sightings outside park boundaries.
Puma responses provide insights into broader ecological impacts, while analyses of bobcat, coyote, and mule deer offer a comprehensive understanding of species responses to dog‐friendly spaces.
Because dogs can be perceived as predators or competitors by wildlife, we anticipated shifts in spatial and temporal activity patterns in response to dogs.
Wildlife responses included avoidance (bobcat, puma) or spatial overlap (mule deer) for areas with more dogs, and no effect (coyote).
Mule deer may benefit from a “human shield” provided by people with dogs, while pumas and bobcats appeared more sensitive, and coyotes more adaptable.
Dog policies influenced puma and mule deer temporal activity, with increased nocturnal activity in dog‐friendly PAs.
Bobcat temporal activity was less variable in dog‐friendly PAs and coyote activity was similar between treatments.
Outside PAs, puma sightings increased with human disturbance.
Our study underscores the trade‐offs between recreation and wildlife conservation, emphasizing the need to quantify the ecological impacts of dogs.
This understanding is vital for informing conservation strategies and promoting coexistence between dogs, wildlife, and protected environments.
Related Results
Puma spatial ecology in open habitats with aggregate prey
Puma spatial ecology in open habitats with aggregate prey
Solitary felids are commonly associated with structurally complex habitats, where their foraging success is attributed to stealth and remaining undetected by competitive scavengers...
Puma spatial ecology in open habitats with aggregate prey
Puma spatial ecology in open habitats with aggregate prey
Solitary felids are commonly associated with structurally complex habitats, where their foraging success is attributed to stealth and remaining undetected by competitive scavengers...
Dog owner mental health is associated with dog behavioural problems, dog care and dog-facilitated social interaction: a prospective cohort study
Dog owner mental health is associated with dog behavioural problems, dog care and dog-facilitated social interaction: a prospective cohort study
AbstractDespite numerous qualitative and cross-sectional studies investigating how dog-related factors may impact owners’ well-being, empirical studies to test these causal effects...
Global impacts of fire regimes on wildland bird diversity
Global impacts of fire regimes on wildland bird diversity
Abstract
Background
Fire is a natural disturbance that significantly impacts ecosystems and plays a crucial role in the distribution and preservatio...
Effects of human–wildlife conflict on local people's livelihoods and wildlife conservation in and around Alitash National Park, northwest Ethiopia
Effects of human–wildlife conflict on local people's livelihoods and wildlife conservation in and around Alitash National Park, northwest Ethiopia
Human–wildlife conflict has become one of the fundamental aspects of wildlife management. It threatens both wildlife and human welfare. People have injured, abused, and killed wild...
PASTORALIST-WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP IN THE AMBOSELI ECOSYSTEM SOUTHEASTERN KENYA: A CASE STUDY OF MAASAI COMMUNITY
PASTORALIST-WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP IN THE AMBOSELI ECOSYSTEM SOUTHEASTERN KENYA: A CASE STUDY OF MAASAI COMMUNITY
Purpose: To establish the pastoralist-wildlife relationship in the Amboseli Ecosystem South Eastern Kenya.Methodology: The study utilized a descriptive research design.Findings: Re...
Dog-Led Urbanism: An Investigation To Improve The Dog-Friendly Public Landscape In Wellington City Central.
Dog-Led Urbanism: An Investigation To Improve The Dog-Friendly Public Landscape In Wellington City Central.
<p><strong>As one of the earliest animals raised by humans, dogs were domesticated and raised in the Neolithic Age 10,000 years ago. The main purposes of keeping dogs a...
Wildlife law and policy
Wildlife law and policy
One of the crucial issues of our decades is how to stop the loss of biodiversity. Policy–makers need reliable data to base their decisions on. Managing wildlife p...


