The translational role of SOS1 in colorectal cancer

Abstract Background It has been challenging to develop agents directly targeting KRAS driver mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC). Recent efforts have focused on developing inhibitors targeting SOS1 as an attractive approach for KRAS -mutant cancers. Here, we aimed to study the translational role of SOS1 in CRC using patient-derived organoids (PDOs). Method In this study, we used CRC PDOs as preclinical models to evaluate their sensitivity to SOS1 inhibitor BI3406 and its cellular effects. We utilized large CRC datasets including GENIE cohort, TCGA PanCancer Atlas, and CPTAC-2 cohort to study the significance of molecular alterations of SOS1 in CRC. To identify potential predictive markers, we performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) on CRC tissue for SOS1/2 protein expression and RNA sequencing to identify discriminative gene sets for sensitivity to SOS1 inhibition. The findings were validated by DepMap data for SOS1 dependency. Result CRC PDOs instead of cell lines had differential sensitivities to BI3406. There was a significant correlation between SOS1 and SOS2 mRNA expressions (Spearman’s ρ 0.56, p<0.001). SOS1/2 protein expression by IHC were universal with heterogeneous patterns in cancer cells but only minimal to none in surrounding non-malignant cells. SOS1 protein expression was associated with worse overall survival in patients with RAS/RAF mutant CRC ( p =0.04). We also found that SOS1/SOS2 protein expression ratio > 1 by IHC ( p =0.03) instead of KRAS mutation ( p =1) was a better predictive marker to BI3406 sensitivity of CRC PDOs. This was concordant with the significant correlation between SOS1/SOS2 protein expression ratio by mass spectrometry and SOS1 dependency score. RNA-seq and gene set enrichment analysis revealed differentially expressed genes and 7 enriched gene sets involving cholesterol homeostasis, epithelial mesenchymal transition, and TNFα/NFκB signaling in BI3406-resistant CRC PDOs. We further discovered that GTP-bound RAS level underwent rebound at 48 hours upon treatment with BI3406 even in BI3406-sensitive PDOs with no change of KRAS effector genes downstream. Cellular adaptation mechanisms to SOS1 inhibition may involve upregulation of SOS1/2 mRNA and SOS1 protein expressions, which may be overcome by SOS1 knockdown/degradation or synergistic effect of BI3406 with trametinib. Conclusion In summary, CRC PDOs could serve as better models for translational study of SOS1 in CRC. High SOS1 protein expression was a worse prognostic factor in CRC. High SOS1/SOS2 protein expression ratio predicted sensitivity to SOS1 inhibition and dependency. Our preclinical findings supported further clinical development of SOS1-targeting agents in CRC.