Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Organisational autoethnography
View through CrossRef
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to review and organise the autoethnography literature: to explore the obstacles of and opportunities for autoethnography in organisation research; to support PhD students and supervisors who have chosen this methodological route to more clearly define their autoethnographic positions and choices; and to propose new research directions for organisational autoethnography.Design/methodology/approachThe authors critically summarise autoethnography as a contemporary approach to organisational ethnography by looking back, looking at the present, and looking to the future. The authors briefly consider the historical and disciplinary development – and vehement critique – of autoethnography, trace its shifting epistemological positions and introduce three emergent “possibilities” of organisation autoethnography.FindingsThe authors highlight how autoethnography can tell stories otherwise silenced; exploring the mundane, ignored and distorted in current academic life, past and other work experiences, working with others through collaborative or co‐produced autoethnography in exciting new organisational contexts.Originality/valueThis paper is one of the first attempts to review autoethnography as a contemporary approach to organisation autoethnography.
Title: Organisational autoethnography
Description:
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to review and organise the autoethnography literature: to explore the obstacles of and opportunities for autoethnography in organisation research; to support PhD students and supervisors who have chosen this methodological route to more clearly define their autoethnographic positions and choices; and to propose new research directions for organisational autoethnography.
Design/methodology/approachThe authors critically summarise autoethnography as a contemporary approach to organisational ethnography by looking back, looking at the present, and looking to the future.
The authors briefly consider the historical and disciplinary development – and vehement critique – of autoethnography, trace its shifting epistemological positions and introduce three emergent “possibilities” of organisation autoethnography.
FindingsThe authors highlight how autoethnography can tell stories otherwise silenced; exploring the mundane, ignored and distorted in current academic life, past and other work experiences, working with others through collaborative or co‐produced autoethnography in exciting new organisational contexts.
Originality/valueThis paper is one of the first attempts to review autoethnography as a contemporary approach to organisation autoethnography.
Related Results
Contemporary Autoethnography Is Digital Autoethnography
Contemporary Autoethnography Is Digital Autoethnography
Autoethnography has become legitimized through its ability to connect culture to personal experiences. This legitimization has occurred alongside a titanic shift in communication m...
Thank You, Tony E. Adams, Stacy Holman Jones, and Carolyn Ellis, for Offering the Handbook of Autoethnography
Thank You, Tony E. Adams, Stacy Holman Jones, and Carolyn Ellis, for Offering the Handbook of Autoethnography
I offer this review on autoethnography for various social science disciplines for readers, writers, and novice and experienced researchers. The second edition of the Handbook of Au...
Bringing Autoethnography to Undergraduates
Bringing Autoethnography to Undergraduates
The label “autoethnography” has been applied to a wide range of knowledge-producing practices, from what might be considered “normal” science to narrative-driven writing to perform...
Cybersecurity and Organisational Performance – the Interplay
Cybersecurity and Organisational Performance – the Interplay
The interplay between cybersecurity and organisational performance is multifaceted in nature, as it is related to how cybersecurity impacts and is impacted by various organisationa...
Ethical behaviour, organisational support and employee outcomes in driving public sector organisational performance
Ethical behaviour, organisational support and employee outcomes in driving public sector organisational performance
Purpose
This study aims to investigate the relationships between ethical behaviour, perceived organisational support (POS) and organisational performance within...
Leaning Into Autoethnography: A Review of Heewon Chang’s Autoethnography As Method
Leaning Into Autoethnography: A Review of Heewon Chang’s Autoethnography As Method
To lean in means to press forward or to move toward something. Leaning in is a deliberate way to approach something whether it is a strong wind or a new skill. Leaning in describes...
Autoethnography of “My Autoethnography”
Autoethnography of “My Autoethnography”
The purpose of this paper is to reflect on “My Autoethnography” that I performedduring writing dissertation for M.Phil. in Education at a university in Nepal. F...
The Influence of Work Discipline, Organisational Culture, and Organizational Commitment on Employee Performance
The Influence of Work Discipline, Organisational Culture, and Organizational Commitment on Employee Performance
This study aims to analyze the influence of work discipline, organisational culture, and organisational commitment on the performance of employees at the Surabaya Health Department...

