Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Kropotkin

View through CrossRef
This book is designed to remove Peter Kropotkin from the framework of classical anarchism. By focusing attention on his theory of mutual aid, it argues that the classical framing distorts Kropotkin's political theory by associating it with a narrowly positivistic conception of science, a naively optimistic idea of human nature and a millenarian idea of revolution. Kropotkin's abiding concern with Russian revolutionary politics is the lens for this analysis. The argument is that his engagement with nihilism shaped his conception of science and that his expeditions in Siberia underpinned an approach to social analysis that was rooted in geography. Looking at Kropotkin's relationship with Elisée Reclus and Erico Malatesta and examining his critical appreciation of P-J. Proudhon, Michael Bakunin and Max Stirner, the study shows how he understood anarchist traditions and reveals the special character of his anarchist communism. His idea of the state as a colonising process and his contention that exploitation and oppression operate in global contexts is a key feature of this. Kropotkin's views about the role of theory in revolutionary practice show how he developed this critique of the state and capitalism to advance an idea of political change that combined the building of non-state alternatives through direct action and wilful disobedience. Against critics who argue that Kropotkin betrayed these principles in 1914, the book suggests that this controversial decision was consistent with his anarchism and that it reflected his judgment about the prospects of anarchistic revolution in Russia.
Edinburgh University Press
Title: Kropotkin
Description:
This book is designed to remove Peter Kropotkin from the framework of classical anarchism.
By focusing attention on his theory of mutual aid, it argues that the classical framing distorts Kropotkin's political theory by associating it with a narrowly positivistic conception of science, a naively optimistic idea of human nature and a millenarian idea of revolution.
Kropotkin's abiding concern with Russian revolutionary politics is the lens for this analysis.
The argument is that his engagement with nihilism shaped his conception of science and that his expeditions in Siberia underpinned an approach to social analysis that was rooted in geography.
Looking at Kropotkin's relationship with Elisée Reclus and Erico Malatesta and examining his critical appreciation of P-J.
Proudhon, Michael Bakunin and Max Stirner, the study shows how he understood anarchist traditions and reveals the special character of his anarchist communism.
His idea of the state as a colonising process and his contention that exploitation and oppression operate in global contexts is a key feature of this.
Kropotkin's views about the role of theory in revolutionary practice show how he developed this critique of the state and capitalism to advance an idea of political change that combined the building of non-state alternatives through direct action and wilful disobedience.
Against critics who argue that Kropotkin betrayed these principles in 1914, the book suggests that this controversial decision was consistent with his anarchism and that it reflected his judgment about the prospects of anarchistic revolution in Russia.

Related Results

Estratégias da luta epistemológica de P. Kropotkin
Estratégias da luta epistemológica de P. Kropotkin
Objetiva-se, nesse artigo, compreender o contexto cultural, a trajetória e as estratégias que resultam no estabelecimento de P. Kropotkin como renomado cientista e militante anarqu...
Conclusion to Part 3
Conclusion to Part 3
In his critical, melancholy reminiscence of Kropotkin, Malatesta made a number of significant claims about his anarchism. First, it traced a progressive evolution, leading to emanc...
From New Anarchism to Post-anarchism
From New Anarchism to Post-anarchism
This chapter examines contemporary anarchist critiques of Kropotkin, especially post-anarchist analysis. It argues that science has become a byword to describe Kropotkin's politica...
Pyotr Kropotkin: Foundations of Anarchist Prison Abolition
Pyotr Kropotkin: Foundations of Anarchist Prison Abolition
This chapter examines the fascinating life and thought of Pyotr Kropotkin, arguably the most important figure in the anarchist tradition of prison abolition. Starting with his chil...
Formulating an Anarchist Sociology: Peter Kropotkin’s Reading of Herbert Spencer
Formulating an Anarchist Sociology: Peter Kropotkin’s Reading of Herbert Spencer
The work of Herbert Spencer was a crucial influence on the development of Peter Kropotkin’s historical sociology. However, scholars have underestimated this relationship; either ov...
Nihilism
Nihilism
This chapter examines Kropotkin's understanding of nihilism and uses his sympathetic account of the Russian movement to re-consider his approach to science. It shows how Kropotkin ...
Mapping the State
Mapping the State
This chapter outlines three parallel accounts of the state that Kropotkin developed in the 1870s and 1880s as an anarchist critic of Tsarism. The first was an explanatory account f...
Introduction
Introduction
Peter Kropotkin has an unenviable reputation for being one of the foremost anarchist thinkers of the nineteenth century. Keeping company with Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, famous for ado...

Back to Top