Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Religious Centrality Across 22 Countries

View through CrossRef
Religious Centrality has been widely studied in Europe and North America and is generally associated with better psychological and social outcomes. Religious centrality is often assessed as a measure of intrinsic religiosity (IR)—religion as one’s guiding approach to life – and has been widely validated in societies around the world. However, most studies of religious centrality/IR are cross-sectional and use samples from ‘Western’ societies or samples from single non-European societies. Moreover, most samples are not nationally representative. Systematic comparisons are difficult because the samples, measures, and procedures vary between studies. This article examines religious centrality across 22 nationally representative samples from religiously diverse countries from the 1st wave of the Global Flourishing Study (GFS) using a single-item IR measure and identical demographic measures and methods in each country. The study will serve as the foundation for longitudinal studies designed to assess the causal impact of religious centrality on human flourishing. In the current study, we find societies range widely, with religious centrality lowest in Europe and East Asia, moderate in the Americas and Israel, and highest in Africa and the rest of Asia. We discuss the complexities of assessing religious centrality across religious traditions, how the demographic factors associated with religious centrality vary between countries, and provide implications for secularization theory as well as theories of human flourishing.
Title: Religious Centrality Across 22 Countries
Description:
Religious Centrality has been widely studied in Europe and North America and is generally associated with better psychological and social outcomes.
Religious centrality is often assessed as a measure of intrinsic religiosity (IR)—religion as one’s guiding approach to life – and has been widely validated in societies around the world.
However, most studies of religious centrality/IR are cross-sectional and use samples from ‘Western’ societies or samples from single non-European societies.
Moreover, most samples are not nationally representative.
Systematic comparisons are difficult because the samples, measures, and procedures vary between studies.
This article examines religious centrality across 22 nationally representative samples from religiously diverse countries from the 1st wave of the Global Flourishing Study (GFS) using a single-item IR measure and identical demographic measures and methods in each country.
The study will serve as the foundation for longitudinal studies designed to assess the causal impact of religious centrality on human flourishing.
In the current study, we find societies range widely, with religious centrality lowest in Europe and East Asia, moderate in the Americas and Israel, and highest in Africa and the rest of Asia.
We discuss the complexities of assessing religious centrality across religious traditions, how the demographic factors associated with religious centrality vary between countries, and provide implications for secularization theory as well as theories of human flourishing.

Related Results

Centrality in Complex Networks with Overlapping Community Structure
Centrality in Complex Networks with Overlapping Community Structure
AbstractIdentifying influential spreaders in networks is an essential issue in order to prevent epidemic spreading, or to accelerate information diffusion. Several centrality measu...
The independence of the centrality for community detection
The independence of the centrality for community detection
Community detection is significative in the complex network. This paper focuses on community detection based on clustering algorithms. We tend to find out the central nodes of the ...
Connectivity-based time centrality in time-varying graphs
Connectivity-based time centrality in time-varying graphs
Abstract Time-varying graphs (TVGs) enable the study and understanding of the dynamics of many real-world networked systems. The notion of centrality in TVG scenario...
Is ‘distinctiveness centrality’ actually distinctive? A comment on Fronzetti Colladon and Naldi (2020)
Is ‘distinctiveness centrality’ actually distinctive? A comment on Fronzetti Colladon and Naldi (2020)
Distinctiveness centrality, which was proposed in 2020 to identify nodes that are connected to poorly-connected neighbors, is simply a minor variation on two existing centrality me...
Triangle Centrality
Triangle Centrality
Triangle centrality is introduced for finding important vertices in a graph based on the concentration of triangles surrounding each vertex. It has the distinct feature of allowing...
Faith Tweets: Ambient Religious Communication and Microblogging Rituals
Faith Tweets: Ambient Religious Communication and Microblogging Rituals
There’s no reason to think that Jesus wouldn’t have Facebooked or twittered if he came into the world now. Can you imagine his killer status updates? Reverend Schenck, New York, Al...
PENERAPAN KONSEP SENTRALITAS PADA KERATON SURAKARTA HADININGRAT
PENERAPAN KONSEP SENTRALITAS PADA KERATON SURAKARTA HADININGRAT
Abstract - Keraton is a term to describe a place where Javanese ruler and his family lives. Keraton, which regarded as a historical building, holds an important role in development...
A Sociological Study on Abdi̇zade's History of Amasya: Religious Groups in Amasya
A Sociological Study on Abdi̇zade's History of Amasya: Religious Groups in Amasya
Since groups constitute one of the essential components of the social structure, they form a fundamental subject of sociological inquiry. A subcategory of social groups, religious ...

Back to Top