Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Modeling Of Turbulent Transport Equations
View through CrossRef
The high-Reynolds-number turbulent flows of technological importance contain such a wide range of excited length and time scales that the application of direct or large-eddy simulations is all but impossible for the foreseeable future. Reynolds stress models remain the only viable means for the solution of these complex turbulent flows. It is widely believed that Reynolds stress models are completely ad hoc, having no formal connection with solutions of the full Navier-Stokes equations for turbulent flows. While this belief is largely warranted for the older eddy viscosity models of turbulence, it constitutes a far too pessimistic assessment of the current generation of Reynolds stress closures. It will be shown how secondorder closure models and two-equation models with an anisotropic eddy viscosity can be systematically derived from the Navier-Stokes equations when one overriding assumption is made: the turbulence is locally homogeneous and in equilibrium. A brief review of zero equation models and one equation models based on the Boussinesq eddy viscosity hypothesis will first be provided in order to gain a perspective on the earlier approaches to Reynolds stress modeling. It will, however, be argued that since turbulent flows contain length and time scales that change dramatically from one flow configuration to the next, two-equation models constitute the minimum level of closure that is physically acceptable. Typically, modeled transport equations are solved for the turbulent kinetic energy and dissipation rate from which the turbulent length and time scales are built up; this obviates the need to specify these scales in an ad hoc fashion. While two-equation models represent the minimum acceptable closure, second-order closure models constitute the most complex level of closure that is currently feasible from a computational standpoint. It will be shown how the former models follow from the latter in the equilibrium limit of homogeneous turbulence. However, the two-equation models that are formally consistent with second-order closures have an anisotropic eddy viscosity with strain-dependent coefficients - a feature that most of the commonly used models do not possess.
Title: Modeling Of Turbulent Transport Equations
Description:
The high-Reynolds-number turbulent flows of technological importance contain such a wide range of excited length and time scales that the application of direct or large-eddy simulations is all but impossible for the foreseeable future.
Reynolds stress models remain the only viable means for the solution of these complex turbulent flows.
It is widely believed that Reynolds stress models are completely ad hoc, having no formal connection with solutions of the full Navier-Stokes equations for turbulent flows.
While this belief is largely warranted for the older eddy viscosity models of turbulence, it constitutes a far too pessimistic assessment of the current generation of Reynolds stress closures.
It will be shown how secondorder closure models and two-equation models with an anisotropic eddy viscosity can be systematically derived from the Navier-Stokes equations when one overriding assumption is made: the turbulence is locally homogeneous and in equilibrium.
A brief review of zero equation models and one equation models based on the Boussinesq eddy viscosity hypothesis will first be provided in order to gain a perspective on the earlier approaches to Reynolds stress modeling.
It will, however, be argued that since turbulent flows contain length and time scales that change dramatically from one flow configuration to the next, two-equation models constitute the minimum level of closure that is physically acceptable.
Typically, modeled transport equations are solved for the turbulent kinetic energy and dissipation rate from which the turbulent length and time scales are built up; this obviates the need to specify these scales in an ad hoc fashion.
While two-equation models represent the minimum acceptable closure, second-order closure models constitute the most complex level of closure that is currently feasible from a computational standpoint.
It will be shown how the former models follow from the latter in the equilibrium limit of homogeneous turbulence.
However, the two-equation models that are formally consistent with second-order closures have an anisotropic eddy viscosity with strain-dependent coefficients - a feature that most of the commonly used models do not possess.
Related Results
Turbulent models of shallow-water equations-based smoothed particle hydrodynamics
Turbulent models of shallow-water equations-based smoothed particle hydrodynamics
The depth-averaged models such as those based on the shallow water equations (SWEs) are commonly used to simulate the large-scale flows with engineering importance. The smoothed pa...
Large-eddy simulations of the mountain boundary layer : daytime exchange processes and nocturnal fog formation
Large-eddy simulations of the mountain boundary layer : daytime exchange processes and nocturnal fog formation
In this dissertation, different aspects of turbulent transport and thermally driven flows over complex terrain are investigated. Two publications concentrate on the vertical heat a...
Research on Approval of Domestic and International Transport Container Application of Radioactive Material
Research on Approval of Domestic and International Transport Container Application of Radioactive Material
Due to the potentially dangerous properties of radioactive material, it is during the transport that the process of nuclear energy and technology uses are prone to nuclear and radi...
Multirate mass transfer and biofilm growth modeling in porous media
Multirate mass transfer and biofilm growth modeling in porous media
Reactive transport modeling is a methodological tool to study the coupled physical, chemical and biological processes in Earth system. It is complex not only because of the nature ...
SYSTEMATIZATION OF THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK OF ENSURING THE WATER TRANSPORT COMPETITIVENESS IN UKRAINE
SYSTEMATIZATION OF THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK OF ENSURING THE WATER TRANSPORT COMPETITIVENESS IN UKRAINE
Topicality. Business entities in the field of water transport can gain competitive advantages and ensure their competitiveness through the introduction of innovations into the proc...
On the numerical simulation of compressible flows
On the numerical simulation of compressible flows
In this thesis, numerical tools to simulate compressible flows in a wide range of situations are presented. It is intended to represent a step forward in the scientific research of...
GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF PRIORITIZING TASKS FOR DEVELOPING UKRAINE'S WATER TRANSPORT
GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF PRIORITIZING TASKS FOR DEVELOPING UKRAINE'S WATER TRANSPORT
Topicality. Water transport is of crucial importance for the economic prosperity and national security of Ukraine. Most sectors of the economy depend on water transport and its inf...
Modeling of pressure spectra in a turbulent shear flow
Modeling of pressure spectra in a turbulent shear flow
Models of turbulent-turbulent and turbulent-shear contributions to pressure spectra in a turbulent shear flow are developed. The spectral model for the turbulent-shear contribution...

